Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Robyn Larsen, Frances Taylor, Paddy C Dempsey, Melitta McNarry, Kym Rickards, Parneet Sethi, Ashleigh Homer, Neale Cohen, Neville Owen, Kavita Kumareswaran, Richard MacIsaac, Sybil A McAuley, David O'Neal, David W Dunstan
{"title":"Effect of Interrupting Prolonged Sitting with Frequent Activity Breaks on Postprandial Glycemia and Insulin Sensitivity in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes on Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy: A Randomized Crossover Pilot Trial.","authors":"Robyn Larsen, Frances Taylor, Paddy C Dempsey, Melitta McNarry, Kym Rickards, Parneet Sethi, Ashleigh Homer, Neale Cohen, Neville Owen, Kavita Kumareswaran, Richard MacIsaac, Sybil A McAuley, David O'Neal, David W Dunstan","doi":"10.1089/dia.2024.0146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> This study examined acute effects of interrupting prolonged sitting with short activity breaks on postprandial glucose/insulin responses and estimations of insulin sensitivity in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). <b><i>Method:</i></b> In a randomized crossover trial, eight adults (age = 46 ± 14 years [mean ± SD], body mass index [BMI] = 27.2 ± 3.8 kg/m<sup>2</sup>) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy completed two 6-h conditions as follows: uninterrupted sitting (SIT) and sitting interrupted with 3-min bouts of simple resistance activities (SRAs) every 30 min. Basal and bolus insulin were standardized across conditions except in cases of hypoglycemia. Postprandial responses were assessed using incremental area-under-the-curve (iAUC) and total AUC (tAUC) from half-hourly venous sampling. Meal-based insulin sensitivity determined from glucose sensor and insulin pump (S<i><sub>i</sub></i><sup>SP</sup>) was assessed from flash continuous glucose monitor and insulin pump data. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed models adjusted for sex, BMI, treatment order, and preprandial values. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Glucose iAUC did not differ by condition (SIT: 19.8 ± 3.0 [estimated marginal means ± standard error] vs. SRA: 14.4 ± 3.0 mmol.6 h.L<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.086). Despite CSII being standardized between conditions, insulin iAUC was higher in SRA compared to SIT (137.1 ± 22.7 vs. 170.9 ± 22.7 mU.6 h.L<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> < 0.001). This resulted in a lower glucose response relative to the change in plasma insulin in SRA (tAUCglu/tAUCins: 0.32 ± 0.02 vs. 0.40 ± 0.02 mmol.mU<sup>-1</sup>; <i>P</i> = 0.03). Si<sup>SP</sup> was also higher at dinner following the SRA condition, with no between-condition differences at breakfast or lunch. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Regularly interrupting prolonged sitting in T1D may increase plasma insulin and improve insulin sensitivity when meals and CSII are standardized. Future studies should explore underlying mechanistic determinants and the applicability of findings to those on multiple daily injections. <b><i>Trial Registration:</i></b> Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Identifier-ACTRN12618000126213 (www.anzctr.org.au).</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/dia.2024.0146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study examined acute effects of interrupting prolonged sitting with short activity breaks on postprandial glucose/insulin responses and estimations of insulin sensitivity in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Method: In a randomized crossover trial, eight adults (age = 46 ± 14 years [mean ± SD], body mass index [BMI] = 27.2 ± 3.8 kg/m2) receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy completed two 6-h conditions as follows: uninterrupted sitting (SIT) and sitting interrupted with 3-min bouts of simple resistance activities (SRAs) every 30 min. Basal and bolus insulin were standardized across conditions except in cases of hypoglycemia. Postprandial responses were assessed using incremental area-under-the-curve (iAUC) and total AUC (tAUC) from half-hourly venous sampling. Meal-based insulin sensitivity determined from glucose sensor and insulin pump (SiSP) was assessed from flash continuous glucose monitor and insulin pump data. Outcomes were analyzed using mixed models adjusted for sex, BMI, treatment order, and preprandial values. Results: Glucose iAUC did not differ by condition (SIT: 19.8 ± 3.0 [estimated marginal means ± standard error] vs. SRA: 14.4 ± 3.0 mmol.6 h.L-1; P = 0.086). Despite CSII being standardized between conditions, insulin iAUC was higher in SRA compared to SIT (137.1 ± 22.7 vs. 170.9 ± 22.7 mU.6 h.L-1; P < 0.001). This resulted in a lower glucose response relative to the change in plasma insulin in SRA (tAUCglu/tAUCins: 0.32 ± 0.02 vs. 0.40 ± 0.02 mmol.mU-1; P = 0.03). SiSP was also higher at dinner following the SRA condition, with no between-condition differences at breakfast or lunch. Conclusion: Regularly interrupting prolonged sitting in T1D may increase plasma insulin and improve insulin sensitivity when meals and CSII are standardized. Future studies should explore underlying mechanistic determinants and the applicability of findings to those on multiple daily injections. Trial Registration: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Identifier-ACTRN12618000126213 (www.anzctr.org.au).

频繁活动中断久坐对持续皮下注射胰岛素的 1 型糖尿病成人餐后血糖和胰岛素敏感性的影响:一项随机交叉试验。
研究目的本研究探讨了用短暂的活动间歇打断久坐对 1 型糖尿病(T1D)成人餐后血糖/胰岛素反应和胰岛素敏感性评估的急性影响。研究方法在一项随机交叉试验中,8 名接受连续皮下注射胰岛素(CSII)治疗的成人(年龄 = 46 ± 14 岁 [平均 ± SD],体重指数 [BMI] = 27.2 ± 3.8 kg/m2)完成了以下两种 6 小时的治疗:不间断坐姿(SIT)和每 30 分钟坐姿中断 3 分钟的简单抵抗活动(SRA)。除低血糖情况外,不同条件下的基础胰岛素和胰岛素栓都是标准化的。餐后反应采用每半小时静脉采样的增量曲线下面积(iAUC)和总AUC(tAUC)进行评估。根据闪存连续血糖监测仪和胰岛素泵数据评估了由葡萄糖传感器和胰岛素泵(SiSP)确定的餐后胰岛素敏感性。结果采用混合模型进行分析,并对性别、体重指数、治疗顺序和餐前值进行了调整。结果葡萄糖 iAUC 在不同条件下没有差异(SIT:19.8 ± 3.0 [估计边际平均值 ± 标准误差] vs. SRA:14.4 ± 3.0 mmol.6 h.L-1;P = 0.086)。尽管 CSII 在不同条件下是标准化的,但与 SIT 相比,SRA 的胰岛素 iAUC 更高(137.1 ± 22.7 vs. 170.9 ± 22.7 mU.6 h.L-1; P < 0.001)。这导致相对于血浆胰岛素的变化,SRA 的葡萄糖反应较低(tAUCglu/tAUCins:0.32 ± 0.02 vs. 0.40 ± 0.02 mmol.mU-1;P = 0.03)。在 SRA 条件下,晚餐时的 SiSP 也更高,早餐或午餐时则没有条件间差异。结论当进餐和 CSII 标准化时,定期中断 T1D 患者的久坐可能会增加血浆胰岛素并改善胰岛素敏感性。未来的研究应探索潜在的机理决定因素以及研究结果对每日多次注射者的适用性。试验注册:澳大利亚和新西兰临床试验注册标识符-ACTRN12618000126213 (www.anzctr.org.au)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信