Mapping of the health of the Nation Outcomes Scale (HoNOS) and Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) to the EQ-5D-3L in psychosis patients using the PHAMOUS study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anne Kleijburg, Ben Wijnen, Wouter den Hollander, Silvia Evers, Hans Kroon, Joran Lokkerbol
{"title":"Mapping of the health of the Nation Outcomes Scale (HoNOS) and Positive and Negative Symptom Scale (PANSS) to the EQ-5D-3L in psychosis patients using the PHAMOUS study.","authors":"Anne Kleijburg, Ben Wijnen, Wouter den Hollander, Silvia Evers, Hans Kroon, Joran Lokkerbol","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2024.2422456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>When health outcomes relevant for economic evaluations are unavailable, algorithms can be developed to map utilities using available clinical outcome measures. This study aims to develop two mapping algorithms estimating EuroQol-5 dimension-3 level (EQ-5D-3 L) utilities using the clinician-rated Health of the Nation Outcome Scores (HoNOS) and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANNS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A dataset with 2,029 observations of patients with psychotic disorders included EQ-5D-3 L, HoNOS, PANSS item scores, and demographics. Correlations between instruments were evaluated. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and random forest (RF) algorithms with various predictor variable sets were applied. Model performance was cross-validated using R-squared and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High ceiling effects were observed for EQ-5D-3 L, with weak to moderate negative correlations between EQ-5D and HoNOS (<i>r</i> = -0.34) and PANSS (<i>r</i> = -0.27). Overall, LASSO models outperformed RF models, with individual item models performing best for the HoNOS and PANSS, with the best observed RMSEs of 0.241 and 0.231, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The HoNOS and PANSS could be mapped onto EQ-5D-3 L utilities but lack accuracy for individual patient predictions. However, in the absence of alternatives, they could adequately predict population-based utility score differences for health economic evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12244,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737167.2024.2422456","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: When health outcomes relevant for economic evaluations are unavailable, algorithms can be developed to map utilities using available clinical outcome measures. This study aims to develop two mapping algorithms estimating EuroQol-5 dimension-3 level (EQ-5D-3 L) utilities using the clinician-rated Health of the Nation Outcome Scores (HoNOS) and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANNS).

Methods: A dataset with 2,029 observations of patients with psychotic disorders included EQ-5D-3 L, HoNOS, PANSS item scores, and demographics. Correlations between instruments were evaluated. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and random forest (RF) algorithms with various predictor variable sets were applied. Model performance was cross-validated using R-squared and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE).

Results: High ceiling effects were observed for EQ-5D-3 L, with weak to moderate negative correlations between EQ-5D and HoNOS (r = -0.34) and PANSS (r = -0.27). Overall, LASSO models outperformed RF models, with individual item models performing best for the HoNOS and PANSS, with the best observed RMSEs of 0.241 and 0.231, respectively.

Conclusions: The HoNOS and PANSS could be mapped onto EQ-5D-3 L utilities but lack accuracy for individual patient predictions. However, in the absence of alternatives, they could adequately predict population-based utility score differences for health economic evaluations.

利用 PHAMOUS 研究,将民族健康结果量表 (HoNOS) 和积极与消极症状量表 (PANSS) 与精神病患者的 EQ-5D-3L 进行映射。
目标:当无法获得与经济评估相关的健康结果时,可以开发算法,利用现有的临床结果测量来映射效用。本研究旨在开发两种映射算法,利用临床医生评定的国民健康结果评分(HoNOS)和阳性与阴性综合征量表(PANNS)估算EQol-5 dimension-3 level(EQ-5D-3 L)效用:方法:对 2029 名精神病患者的观察数据集包括 EQ-5D-3L、HoNOS、PANSS 项目得分和人口统计学数据。评估了工具之间的相关性。应用了最小绝对收缩和选择操作器(LASSO)回归和随机森林(RF)算法,并使用了不同的预测变量集。使用R平方和均方根误差(RMSE)对模型性能进行交叉验证:在 EQ-5D-3 L 中观察到了较高的上限效应,EQ-5D 与 HoNOS(r = -0.34)和 PANSS(r = -0.27)之间存在弱到中等程度的负相关。总体而言,LASSO 模型优于 RF 模型,单个项目模型在 HoNOS 和 PANSS 中表现最佳,观察到的最佳均方根误差分别为 0.241 和 0.231:HoNOS和PANSS可以映射到EQ-5D-3 L效用上,但对单个患者的预测缺乏准确性。但是,在没有其他替代方法的情况下,它们可以充分预测基于人群的效用评分差异,用于健康经济评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research (ISSN 1473-7167) provides expert reviews on cost-benefit and pharmacoeconomic issues relating to the clinical use of drugs and therapeutic approaches. Coverage includes pharmacoeconomics and quality-of-life research, therapeutic outcomes, evidence-based medicine and cost-benefit research. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review. The journal adopts the unique Expert Review article format, offering a complete overview of current thinking in a key technology area, research or clinical practice, augmented by the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信