Reassessing the role of aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Udaya S Tantry, Richard C Becker, Sahib Singh, Lekshminarayan Raghavakurup, Eliano Navarese, Kevin P Bliden, Paul A Gurbel
{"title":"Reassessing the role of aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease.","authors":"Udaya S Tantry, Richard C Becker, Sahib Singh, Lekshminarayan Raghavakurup, Eliano Navarese, Kevin P Bliden, Paul A Gurbel","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2024.2427338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Recent data question the use of aspirin as a bedrock of antiplatelet therapy in patients with arterial diseases. There are controversies regarding the efficacy of aspirin therapy with respect to specific demographic characteristics, dose and formulations, benefit in primary prevention, and duration in secondary prevention. Importantly, to balance the ischemic benefits and the risk of excessive bleeding following a coronary event, recent studies have investigated strategies to discontinue aspirin therapy and continue with P2Y<sub>12</sub> receptor inhibitor monotherapy. But the precise time when to discontinue aspirin is still unresolved.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Evidence from recent studies evaluating the role of aspirin in primary and secondary prevention studies were collected from a selective literature search. In this review, the authors discuss current recommendations, large scale studies of aspirin therapy, controversies, and potential future opportunities for aspirin therapy.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>With the new evidence showing lower bleeding risk with aspirin free strategies in both primary and secondary prevention studies, the role of aspirin is being revaluated with P2Y<sub>12</sub> receptor inhibitor monotherapy. The potential benefit of novel aspirin formulations and alternative delivery methods, such as inhaled aspirin, are undergoing much needed investigation with the goal of optimizing care for a wide range of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2024.2427338","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Recent data question the use of aspirin as a bedrock of antiplatelet therapy in patients with arterial diseases. There are controversies regarding the efficacy of aspirin therapy with respect to specific demographic characteristics, dose and formulations, benefit in primary prevention, and duration in secondary prevention. Importantly, to balance the ischemic benefits and the risk of excessive bleeding following a coronary event, recent studies have investigated strategies to discontinue aspirin therapy and continue with P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy. But the precise time when to discontinue aspirin is still unresolved.

Areas covered: Evidence from recent studies evaluating the role of aspirin in primary and secondary prevention studies were collected from a selective literature search. In this review, the authors discuss current recommendations, large scale studies of aspirin therapy, controversies, and potential future opportunities for aspirin therapy.

Expert opinion: With the new evidence showing lower bleeding risk with aspirin free strategies in both primary and secondary prevention studies, the role of aspirin is being revaluated with P2Y12 receptor inhibitor monotherapy. The potential benefit of novel aspirin formulations and alternative delivery methods, such as inhaled aspirin, are undergoing much needed investigation with the goal of optimizing care for a wide range of patients.

重新评估阿司匹林在冠心病患者中的作用。
导言:最近的数据对阿司匹林作为动脉疾病患者抗血小板疗法的基础提出了质疑。关于阿司匹林治疗在特定人群特征、剂量和配方、一级预防中的益处以及二级预防中的持续时间等方面的疗效存在争议。重要的是,为了平衡冠状动脉事件后的缺血性获益和过度出血风险,最近的研究探讨了停止阿司匹林治疗并继续使用 P2Y12 受体抑制剂单药治疗的策略。但何时停用阿司匹林的确切时间仍悬而未决:通过选择性文献检索,收集了近期评估阿司匹林在一级和二级预防研究中作用的研究证据。在这篇综述中,作者讨论了当前的建议、阿司匹林治疗的大规模研究、争议以及阿司匹林治疗未来的潜在机会:专家观点:有新证据显示,在一级和二级预防研究中,不使用阿司匹林的策略可降低出血风险,因此阿司匹林与 P2Y12 受体抑制剂单药治疗的作用正在被重新评估。目前正在对新型阿司匹林制剂和替代给药方法(如吸入式阿司匹林)的潜在益处进行亟需的研究,以优化对各类患者的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信