Assessment of the position and quantity of shear walls their correlation with building height on the seismic nonlinear performance

Q2 Engineering
Akram Khelaifia, Ali Zine, Salah Guettala, Rachid Chebili
{"title":"Assessment of the position and quantity of shear walls their correlation with building height on the seismic nonlinear performance","authors":"Akram Khelaifia,&nbsp;Ali Zine,&nbsp;Salah Guettala,&nbsp;Rachid Chebili","doi":"10.1007/s42107-024-01154-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study addresses a crucial research gap by investigating the optimal position of shear walls, the ideal shear wall-floor area ratio in building design, and their correlation with building height using non-linear analysis (Static and Dynamic). The results, including capacity curves, inter-story drift, and performance levels from both nonlinear static analysis and nonlinear dynamic analysis, are explored. Adopting principles of performance-based seismic design, the study reflects a comprehensive approach to seismic analysis and mitigation. The findings underscore that elevating the shear wall ratio not only enhances structural rigidity but also improves reliability in terms of inter-story drift, playing a crucial role in achieving the desired performance level during the design process. For a 7-story structure, a 1.00% shear wall–floor ratio is crucial, while a 1.5% ratio is essential for a 14-story structure to meet design conditions. The study highlights the intricate interplay among shear wall–floor ratios, optimal shear wall positions, and their correlation with building height as pivotal factors or main criteria influencing performance and structural integrity. Additionally, the presence of shear walls adopting compound forms (Box, U, and L) enhances reliability, while incomplete shear walls within the frame degrade half-filled frame stiffness, impacting short beam integrity. Furthermore, the study confirms the reliability of both nonlinear dynamic analysis and nonlinear static analysis, providing valuable insights into optimizing building designs for enhanced structural performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"25 8","pages":"5925 - 5937"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-024-01154-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study addresses a crucial research gap by investigating the optimal position of shear walls, the ideal shear wall-floor area ratio in building design, and their correlation with building height using non-linear analysis (Static and Dynamic). The results, including capacity curves, inter-story drift, and performance levels from both nonlinear static analysis and nonlinear dynamic analysis, are explored. Adopting principles of performance-based seismic design, the study reflects a comprehensive approach to seismic analysis and mitigation. The findings underscore that elevating the shear wall ratio not only enhances structural rigidity but also improves reliability in terms of inter-story drift, playing a crucial role in achieving the desired performance level during the design process. For a 7-story structure, a 1.00% shear wall–floor ratio is crucial, while a 1.5% ratio is essential for a 14-story structure to meet design conditions. The study highlights the intricate interplay among shear wall–floor ratios, optimal shear wall positions, and their correlation with building height as pivotal factors or main criteria influencing performance and structural integrity. Additionally, the presence of shear walls adopting compound forms (Box, U, and L) enhances reliability, while incomplete shear walls within the frame degrade half-filled frame stiffness, impacting short beam integrity. Furthermore, the study confirms the reliability of both nonlinear dynamic analysis and nonlinear static analysis, providing valuable insights into optimizing building designs for enhanced structural performance.

评估剪力墙的位置和数量及其与建筑高度的相关性对抗震非线性性能的影响
本研究利用非线性分析(静态分析和动态分析)研究了建筑设计中剪力墙的最佳位置、理想的剪力墙与楼板面积之比,以及它们与建筑高度的相关性,从而填补了一项重要的研究空白。我们探讨了非线性静态分析和非线性动态分析的结果,包括承载力曲线、层间漂移和性能水平。这项研究采用了基于性能的抗震设计原则,反映了一种全面的抗震分析和减灾方法。研究结果强调,提高剪力墙比不仅能增强结构刚度,还能提高层间漂移的可靠性,在设计过程中对达到预期性能水平起着至关重要的作用。对于 7 层结构而言,1.00% 的剪力墙-楼板比至关重要,而对于 14 层结构而言,1.5% 的剪力墙-楼板比则是满足设计条件的必要条件。研究强调了剪力墙-楼板比、最佳剪力墙位置之间错综复杂的相互作用,以及它们与建筑高度之间的相关性,这些都是影响性能和结构完整性的关键因素或主要标准。此外,采用复合形式(盒形、U 形和 L 形)的剪力墙可提高可靠性,而框架内不完整的剪力墙会降低半填充框架的刚度,影响短梁的完整性。此外,研究还证实了非线性动态分析和非线性静态分析的可靠性,为优化建筑设计以提高结构性能提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信