The evaluation of secondary pneumomediastinum in children: the experience of a pediatric surgery clinic.

Mehmet Emin Boleken, Osman Hakan Kocaman, Abit Demir, Tansel Günendi, Mehmet Çakmak, Osman Dere, Mustafa Erman Dörterler
{"title":"The evaluation of secondary pneumomediastinum in children: the experience of a pediatric surgery clinic.","authors":"Mehmet Emin Boleken, Osman Hakan Kocaman, Abit Demir, Tansel Günendi, Mehmet Çakmak, Osman Dere, Mustafa Erman Dörterler","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.82686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pneumomediastinum, defined as mediastinal emphysema, is the term coined for the presence of air in the mediastinum. It is a rare condition that can occur in children due to various etiologies, especially trauma, and may appear without any underlying injury. We investigated the causes of secondary pneumomediastinum and the treatment approaches in children treated at our clinic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively assessed 26 patients under the age of 18 diagnosed with pneumomediastinum at our clinic between 2011 and 2023. We reviewed patient files, evaluating clinical data including patient history, physical characteristics, symptoms, examination findings, imaging studies, hospital stay duration, treatment methods, and complications. The necessity for advanced imaging methods, bronchoscopy, and surgical interventions was determined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Causes of pneumomediastinum included multiple body trauma in three patients, blunt thoracic trauma in four patients, blunt trauma to the cervical region in two, crush syndrome in three, penetrating trauma to the thorax and cervical region in three, hanging from the neck in one, drowning in water in one, birth trauma in one, foreign body aspiration in six, a tracheal polyp in one, and iatrogenic causes in one. Excluding those with foreign body aspiration, computed tomography was performed on all patients. Bronchoscopy was performed in six patients, detecting tracheal lacerations in two. Of these, tracheal lacerations during bronchoscopy were identified in two patients with foreign body aspiration. Twenty-three patients received conservative management, and six patients died. Patients were categorized into two groups: complicated and uncomplicated. It was observed that stays in intensive care and wards were longer in complicated patients (p<0.05). However, no difference was detected in the resolution time of pneumomediastinum between complicated and uncomplicated patients (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although pneumomediastinum is a self-limiting pathology, ventilation difficulties alongside pneumomediastinum should raise suspicion of esophageal and tracheal injuries, necessitating further investigations. Since the etiologies are very different, each patient should be evaluated separately. In most patients, pneumomediastinum regresses on its own. However, patients with complications should be carefully evaluated for accompanying diseases and injuries.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.82686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pneumomediastinum, defined as mediastinal emphysema, is the term coined for the presence of air in the mediastinum. It is a rare condition that can occur in children due to various etiologies, especially trauma, and may appear without any underlying injury. We investigated the causes of secondary pneumomediastinum and the treatment approaches in children treated at our clinic.

Methods: We retrospectively assessed 26 patients under the age of 18 diagnosed with pneumomediastinum at our clinic between 2011 and 2023. We reviewed patient files, evaluating clinical data including patient history, physical characteristics, symptoms, examination findings, imaging studies, hospital stay duration, treatment methods, and complications. The necessity for advanced imaging methods, bronchoscopy, and surgical interventions was determined.

Results: Causes of pneumomediastinum included multiple body trauma in three patients, blunt thoracic trauma in four patients, blunt trauma to the cervical region in two, crush syndrome in three, penetrating trauma to the thorax and cervical region in three, hanging from the neck in one, drowning in water in one, birth trauma in one, foreign body aspiration in six, a tracheal polyp in one, and iatrogenic causes in one. Excluding those with foreign body aspiration, computed tomography was performed on all patients. Bronchoscopy was performed in six patients, detecting tracheal lacerations in two. Of these, tracheal lacerations during bronchoscopy were identified in two patients with foreign body aspiration. Twenty-three patients received conservative management, and six patients died. Patients were categorized into two groups: complicated and uncomplicated. It was observed that stays in intensive care and wards were longer in complicated patients (p<0.05). However, no difference was detected in the resolution time of pneumomediastinum between complicated and uncomplicated patients (p>0.05).

Conclusion: Although pneumomediastinum is a self-limiting pathology, ventilation difficulties alongside pneumomediastinum should raise suspicion of esophageal and tracheal injuries, necessitating further investigations. Since the etiologies are very different, each patient should be evaluated separately. In most patients, pneumomediastinum regresses on its own. However, patients with complications should be carefully evaluated for accompanying diseases and injuries.

儿童继发性气胸的评估:儿科外科诊所的经验。
背景:纵隔气肿是指纵隔内存在空气。这是一种罕见的疾病,可因各种病因(尤其是外伤)在儿童中发生,也可能在没有任何潜在损伤的情况下出现。我们调查了继发性纵隔气胸的病因以及在本诊所接受治疗的儿童的治疗方法:我们回顾性评估了 2011 年至 2023 年期间在本诊所确诊为气胸的 26 名 18 岁以下患者。我们查阅了患者档案,评估了包括病史、体格特征、症状、检查结果、影像学检查、住院时间、治疗方法和并发症在内的临床数据。我们还确定了是否有必要采用先进的成像方法、支气管镜检查和手术干预:导致气胸的原因包括:3 名患者全身多处外伤、4 名患者胸部钝性外伤、2 名患者颈部钝性外伤、3 名患者挤压综合征、3 名患者胸部和颈部穿透性外伤、1 名患者颈部悬吊、1 名患者溺水、1 名患者产伤、6 名患者异物吸入、1 名患者气管息肉、1 名患者先天性原因。除异物吸入外,所有患者都进行了计算机断层扫描。对六名患者进行了支气管镜检查,发现两名患者有气管撕裂伤。其中,两名异物吸入患者在支气管镜检查中发现气管裂伤。23 名患者接受了保守治疗,6 名患者死亡。患者被分为两组:复杂性和非复杂性。据观察,并发症患者在重症监护室和病房的住院时间较长(P0.05):结论:虽然气胸是一种自限性病症,但在出现气胸的同时出现通气困难,应怀疑食管和气管损伤,因此有必要进行进一步检查。由于病因非常不同,因此应对每位患者进行单独评估。大多数患者的气胸会自行消退。不过,对于有并发症的患者,应仔细评估是否有伴随的疾病和损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信