Advanced platelet-rich fibrin versus connective tissue graft in maxillary gingival recession management.

IF 0.9 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Anupama Tadepalli, Lakshmi Ramachandran, Harinath Parthasarathy, Priyanka Cholan, Swapna Chekurti, Tinu George Peter
{"title":"Advanced platelet-rich fibrin versus connective tissue graft in maxillary gingival recession management.","authors":"Anupama Tadepalli, Lakshmi Ramachandran, Harinath Parthasarathy, Priyanka Cholan, Swapna Chekurti, Tinu George Peter","doi":"10.1002/cap.10317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Platelet concentrates have gained significant attention in periodontology due to their regenerative properties. This randomized clinical trial was aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) and connective tissue graft (CTG) in the management of recession defects. The objectives were to compare changes in recession height and root coverage percentage between the groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systemically healthy individuals presenting Cairo's RT1/RT2 gingival recession defects in the maxilla (n = 40) were treated with either A-PRF or CTG in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF). Clinical parameters were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Mean and complete root coverage percentages were calculated at 3 and 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both the test (CAF + A-PRF) and control (CAF + CTG) groups, a statistically significant reduction in mean recession height was seen from baseline values of 2.90 ± 0.55 mm and 3.15 ± 0.87 mm to 0.80 ± 0.95 mm and 0.15 ± 0.48 mm at 6 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In the test group, 10 sites had complete root coverage at 6 months with mean root coverage of 73.76 ± 29.58%. In the control group, 18 of 20 sites had complete root coverage with mean root coverage of 93.35 ± 23.1%. The control sites had a significantly greater reduction in recession height and higher mean and complete root coverage percentages at 6 months (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study findings suggest that, the CTG had resulted in superior outcomes than A-PRF along with CAF.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Question: To compare the efficacy of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) with connective tissue graft (CTG) in the management of gingival recession defects.</p><p><strong>Finding: </strong>Both interventions showed satisfactory healing. At 6 months, the CTG group demonstrated superior results than the A-PRF group. Meaning: CTG has a greater therapeutic potential than A-PRF in the management of gingival recessions.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Platelet-derived membranes are widely used in various dental therapies due to their healing properties. Limited studies have been conducted using the novel platelet preparations in the management of receding gums. This study compared the effects of advanced platelet-rich fibrin membrane with conventional soft tissue harvested from the palate in the treatment of gum recession. Twenty-three patients requiring gum augmentation were recruited and treated with either platelet-derived membrane (test group) or tissue harvested from their palate (control group). Clinical parameters were measured at baseline (before intervention), 3 months, and 6 months. Both treatment modalities resulted in significant gum coverage at the end of 6 months. On comparison, the control sites had significantly greater improvements in all the measured clinical parameters indicating that tissue obtained from the palate had superior therapeutic potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":55950,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Advances in Periodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cap.10317","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Platelet concentrates have gained significant attention in periodontology due to their regenerative properties. This randomized clinical trial was aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) and connective tissue graft (CTG) in the management of recession defects. The objectives were to compare changes in recession height and root coverage percentage between the groups.

Methods: Systemically healthy individuals presenting Cairo's RT1/RT2 gingival recession defects in the maxilla (n = 40) were treated with either A-PRF or CTG in combination with coronally advanced flap (CAF). Clinical parameters were measured at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months. Mean and complete root coverage percentages were calculated at 3 and 6 months.

Results: In both the test (CAF + A-PRF) and control (CAF + CTG) groups, a statistically significant reduction in mean recession height was seen from baseline values of 2.90 ± 0.55 mm and 3.15 ± 0.87 mm to 0.80 ± 0.95 mm and 0.15 ± 0.48 mm at 6 months, respectively (p < 0.001). In the test group, 10 sites had complete root coverage at 6 months with mean root coverage of 73.76 ± 29.58%. In the control group, 18 of 20 sites had complete root coverage with mean root coverage of 93.35 ± 23.1%. The control sites had a significantly greater reduction in recession height and higher mean and complete root coverage percentages at 6 months (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The study findings suggest that, the CTG had resulted in superior outcomes than A-PRF along with CAF.

Key points: Question: To compare the efficacy of advanced platelet-rich fibrin (A-PRF) with connective tissue graft (CTG) in the management of gingival recession defects.

Finding: Both interventions showed satisfactory healing. At 6 months, the CTG group demonstrated superior results than the A-PRF group. Meaning: CTG has a greater therapeutic potential than A-PRF in the management of gingival recessions.

Plain language summary: Platelet-derived membranes are widely used in various dental therapies due to their healing properties. Limited studies have been conducted using the novel platelet preparations in the management of receding gums. This study compared the effects of advanced platelet-rich fibrin membrane with conventional soft tissue harvested from the palate in the treatment of gum recession. Twenty-three patients requiring gum augmentation were recruited and treated with either platelet-derived membrane (test group) or tissue harvested from their palate (control group). Clinical parameters were measured at baseline (before intervention), 3 months, and 6 months. Both treatment modalities resulted in significant gum coverage at the end of 6 months. On comparison, the control sites had significantly greater improvements in all the measured clinical parameters indicating that tissue obtained from the palate had superior therapeutic potential.

先进的富血小板纤维蛋白与结缔组织移植在上颌牙龈退缩治疗中的对比。
背景:血小板浓缩物因其再生特性而在牙周病学中备受关注。这项随机临床试验旨在比较高级富血小板纤维蛋白(A-PRF)和结缔组织移植(CTG)在治疗牙周衰退缺损中的临床疗效。目的是比较两组患者牙槽骨退缩高度和牙根覆盖率的变化:方法:对上颌出现开罗RT1/RT2牙龈退缩缺损的全身健康者(n = 40)采用A-PRF或CTG结合冠状先进皮瓣(CAF)进行治疗。分别在基线、3 个月和 6 个月时测量临床参数。计算3个月和6个月时的平均值和牙根完全覆盖率:在试验组(CAF + A-PRF)和对照组(CAF + CTG)中,平均牙槽骨后退高度分别从基线值(2.90 ± 0.55 mm)和(3.15 ± 0.87 mm)显著降低到 6 个月时的(0.80 ± 0.95 mm)和(0.15 ± 0.48 mm)(P < 0.001)。试验组有 10 个部位在 6 个月时实现了完全的根覆盖,平均根覆盖率为 73.76 ± 29.58%。在对照组中,20 个部位中有 18 个完全覆盖,平均根覆盖率为 93.35 ± 23.1%。6个月后,对照组的牙槽骨退缩高度明显降低,平均牙根覆盖率和完全牙根覆盖率更高(P < 0.05):研究结果表明,CTG 的疗效优于 A-PRF 和 CAF:问题比较高级富血小板纤维蛋白(A-PRF)和结缔组织移植(CTG)在治疗牙龈退缩缺损中的疗效:结果:两种治疗方法的愈合效果均令人满意。6个月后,CTG组的疗效优于A-PRF组。这意味着什么?在治疗牙龈退缩方面,CTG 比 A-PRF 具有更大的治疗潜力。白话摘要:血小板衍生膜因其愈合特性而被广泛应用于各种牙科疗法中。目前使用新型血小板制剂治疗牙龈退缩的研究还很有限。这项研究比较了先进的富血小板纤维蛋白膜与传统的上颚软组织在治疗牙龈退缩方面的效果。研究人员招募了 23 名需要牙龈增生的患者,他们分别接受了血小板萃取膜(试验组)或从上颚采集的组织(对照组)的治疗。分别在基线(干预前)、3 个月和 6 个月时测量临床参数。在 6 个月后,两种治疗方法都能显著覆盖牙龈。相比之下,对照组的所有临床参数都有明显改善,这表明从腭部获取的组织具有更好的治疗潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Advances in Periodontics
Clinical Advances in Periodontics DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信