Short-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Colectomy Using the Overlap Method for Right-sided Colon Cancer.

Cancer diagnosis & prognosis Pub Date : 2024-11-03 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.21873/cdp.10398
Masatsugu Ishii, Toshikatsu Nitta, Yasuhiko Ueda, Masataka Taki, Ryuutaro Kubo, Norihiro Hosokawa, Takashi Ishibashi
{"title":"Short-term Outcomes of Robot-assisted Colectomy Using the Overlap Method for Right-sided Colon Cancer.","authors":"Masatsugu Ishii, Toshikatsu Nitta, Yasuhiko Ueda, Masataka Taki, Ryuutaro Kubo, Norihiro Hosokawa, Takashi Ishibashi","doi":"10.21873/cdp.10398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The recent development of minimally invasive surgery has led to transition from laparoscopic right colectomy (LC) to robot-assisted right colectomy (RC) in Japan. However, it is unclear whether the introduction of RC in municipal hospitals could be as safe as that in high-volume centers in Japan. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to compare the short-term operative outcomes of RC and LC for right colon cancer at a local municipal hospital in Japan.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with stage I-IV right colon cancer who underwent elective RC or LC between January 2021 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with double cancer and those who underwent delta anastomosis were excluded. Postoperative surveillance included patient interviews, physical examinations, tumor marker examinations, and whole-body computed tomography every six months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty patients were analyzed, and 24 (60%) and 16 (40%) patients assigned in the LC and RC groups, respectively, were compared. The operative time, bleeding, postoperative complications, and pathological examinations did not differ significantly between the LC and RC groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RC using overlapping anastomoses was comparable to LC in terms of short-term operative outcomes. The introduction of RC with overlapping anastomosis is a feasible surgical technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":72510,"journal":{"name":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","volume":"4 6","pages":"797-801"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11534047/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: The recent development of minimally invasive surgery has led to transition from laparoscopic right colectomy (LC) to robot-assisted right colectomy (RC) in Japan. However, it is unclear whether the introduction of RC in municipal hospitals could be as safe as that in high-volume centers in Japan. Therefore, this retrospective study aimed to compare the short-term operative outcomes of RC and LC for right colon cancer at a local municipal hospital in Japan.

Patients and methods: Patients with stage I-IV right colon cancer who underwent elective RC or LC between January 2021 and July 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients with double cancer and those who underwent delta anastomosis were excluded. Postoperative surveillance included patient interviews, physical examinations, tumor marker examinations, and whole-body computed tomography every six months.

Results: Forty patients were analyzed, and 24 (60%) and 16 (40%) patients assigned in the LC and RC groups, respectively, were compared. The operative time, bleeding, postoperative complications, and pathological examinations did not differ significantly between the LC and RC groups.

Conclusion: RC using overlapping anastomoses was comparable to LC in terms of short-term operative outcomes. The introduction of RC with overlapping anastomosis is a feasible surgical technique.

使用重叠法进行机器人辅助结肠切除术治疗右侧结肠癌的短期疗效
背景/目的:近年来,随着微创手术的发展,日本已从腹腔镜右结肠切除术(LC)过渡到机器人辅助右结肠切除术(RC)。然而,目前还不清楚在市级医院引进 RC 是否能像在日本大容量中心一样安全。因此,这项回顾性研究旨在比较日本一家地方市立医院采用 RC 和 LC 治疗右侧结肠癌的短期手术效果:回顾性分析了 2021 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月间接受选择性 RC 或 LC 的 I-IV 期右侧结肠癌患者。不包括双癌患者和接受三角吻合术的患者。术后监测包括患者访谈、体格检查、肿瘤标志物检查以及每六个月一次的全身计算机断层扫描:对 40 例患者进行了分析,比较了 LC 组和 RC 组分别有 24 例(60%)和 16 例(40%)患者。LC组和RC组的手术时间、出血量、术后并发症和病理检查无明显差异:结论:就短期手术效果而言,采用重叠吻合的 RC 与 LC 具有可比性。结论:就短期手术效果而言,采用重叠吻合的 RC 与 LC 具有可比性,采用重叠吻合的 RC 是一种可行的手术技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信