A Generalizable Framework for Kidney Stone Composition Characterization Using Dual-Energy CT.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Picha Shunhavanich, Andrea Ferrero, Cynthia H McCollough, Scott S Hsieh
{"title":"A Generalizable Framework for Kidney Stone Composition Characterization Using Dual-Energy CT.","authors":"Picha Shunhavanich, Andrea Ferrero, Cynthia H McCollough, Scott S Hsieh","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Classification of non-uric acid (NUA) renal stones in dual-energy CT (DECT) is difficult due to their similar CT number ratios (CTRs) and because the CTRs change with patient size and acquisition protocol. In this work, we developed a generalizable framework to estimate correct CTR threshold for different stone types, protocols, and patient sizes and validated the results on two DECT scanners.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our framework assumes generic x-ray spectra, estimates the added filtration to match half-value-layer (HVL) measurements, and predicts the CTR of each stone type from the chemical composition and patient size. The framework was validated for four calcium or iodine inserts in two solid water phantom sizes on two DECT scanners, and on 45 human urinary stones of five types (uric acid, cystine, calcium oxalate monohydrate, brushite, and hydroxyapatite) in three different water phantom sizes on a dual-source DECT. All scans were performed at high dose, using routine acquisition parameters. The predicted CTR was compared with the measured CTR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The predicted CTRs for different stone types were consistent with experimentally measured values, with average absolute errors of 2.8% (range 1.3-4.3%), 1.8% (range 0.7-4.4%), and 1.8% (range 0.8-2.4%) for the 30, 40, and 50 cm phantom sizes. The predicted CTR errors of the four inserts were within 6.4%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed framework uses easily obtained HVL measurements to predict renal stone CTRs of different compositions for varied patient sizes. With further refinement, it may help classify NUA subtypes in clinical scans.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Classification of non-uric acid (NUA) renal stones in dual-energy CT (DECT) is difficult due to their similar CT number ratios (CTRs) and because the CTRs change with patient size and acquisition protocol. In this work, we developed a generalizable framework to estimate correct CTR threshold for different stone types, protocols, and patient sizes and validated the results on two DECT scanners.

Materials and methods: Our framework assumes generic x-ray spectra, estimates the added filtration to match half-value-layer (HVL) measurements, and predicts the CTR of each stone type from the chemical composition and patient size. The framework was validated for four calcium or iodine inserts in two solid water phantom sizes on two DECT scanners, and on 45 human urinary stones of five types (uric acid, cystine, calcium oxalate monohydrate, brushite, and hydroxyapatite) in three different water phantom sizes on a dual-source DECT. All scans were performed at high dose, using routine acquisition parameters. The predicted CTR was compared with the measured CTR.

Results: The predicted CTRs for different stone types were consistent with experimentally measured values, with average absolute errors of 2.8% (range 1.3-4.3%), 1.8% (range 0.7-4.4%), and 1.8% (range 0.8-2.4%) for the 30, 40, and 50 cm phantom sizes. The predicted CTR errors of the four inserts were within 6.4%.

Conclusion: The developed framework uses easily obtained HVL measurements to predict renal stone CTRs of different compositions for varied patient sizes. With further refinement, it may help classify NUA subtypes in clinical scans.

利用双能量 CT 确定肾结石成分特征的通用框架
理由和目的:在双能 CT(DECT)中对非尿酸(NUA)肾结石进行分类很困难,因为它们的 CT 数比(CTR)相似,而且 CTR 会随着患者体型和采集方案的变化而变化。在这项工作中,我们开发了一个可通用的框架来估计不同结石类型、采集方案和患者体型的正确CTR阈值,并在两台DECT扫描仪上对结果进行了验证:我们的框架假定了通用的X射线光谱,估算了与半值层(HVL)测量相匹配的附加过滤,并根据化学成分和患者大小预测了每种结石类型的CTR。该框架在两台 DECT 扫描仪上对两种固体水模型尺寸中的四种钙或碘插入物进行了验证,并在一台双源 DECT 上对三种不同水模型尺寸中的 45 种人体尿路结石(尿酸、胱氨酸、一水草酸钙、刷状石和羟基磷灰石)进行了验证。所有扫描均在高剂量下进行,使用常规采集参数。预测的 CTR 与测量的 CTR 进行了比较:不同类型石头的预测 CTR 与实验测量值一致,30、40 和 50 厘米幻影尺寸的平均绝对误差分别为 2.8%(范围 1.3-4.3%)、1.8%(范围 0.7-4.4%)和 1.8%(范围 0.8-2.4%)。四种插入物的预测 CTR 误差在 6.4% 以内:所开发的框架利用容易获得的 HVL 测量值来预测不同患者体型的不同成分肾结石的 CTR。经过进一步改进,该框架可能有助于在临床扫描中对 NUA 亚型进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信