Gender-based provisions in mental health legislation: a review of English language jurisdictions.

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Fiona Hoare, Niamh Murphy, Ann O'Donoghue, Siobhan Allen, Richard M Duffy
{"title":"Gender-based provisions in mental health legislation: a review of English language jurisdictions.","authors":"Fiona Hoare, Niamh Murphy, Ann O'Donoghue, Siobhan Allen, Richard M Duffy","doi":"10.1017/ipm.2024.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Legislation is a powerful tool for facilitating mental healthcare. Gender is an important social determinant of physical and mental health. Many jurisdictions are in the process of revising their mental health law, to align with human rights commitments. Consideration of gender in these revisions could enhance the mental healthcare received by women, transgender and non-binary individuals.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This paper examines gender-based provisions in mental health law published in English.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Countries that use English as an official language were identified. Jurisdictions in these countries with stand-alone mental health laws were included. Legislation was reviewed for gender-specific provisions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-five countries were evaluated; 71 jurisdictions were included. Thirty-eight jurisdictions had 88 gender-specific provisions. These addressed ten key areas, including: general gender-based protections, female representation on boards and review panels, protections during searching and restraint, gender separated facilities, protections in relation to parenting, fertility, sterilisation and termination. Fiji, Ghana, India, and the Australian jurisdictions had the highest number of gender-specific laws. However, gender-specific provisions are highly heterogeneous and are drafted from a cisnormative perspective and fail to adequately address the specific needs of individuals outside of that framework.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Gender-specific provisions can enhance the protections afforded by mental health law. However, as legislation can be a blunt instrument, careful consideration must be given to potential unintended consequences. During revisions of mental health law consideration should be given to gender-specific provisions and legislation must be inclusive of individuals identifying as transgender, non-binary and other genders.</p>","PeriodicalId":46220,"journal":{"name":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Legislation is a powerful tool for facilitating mental healthcare. Gender is an important social determinant of physical and mental health. Many jurisdictions are in the process of revising their mental health law, to align with human rights commitments. Consideration of gender in these revisions could enhance the mental healthcare received by women, transgender and non-binary individuals.

Aim: This paper examines gender-based provisions in mental health law published in English.

Methods: Countries that use English as an official language were identified. Jurisdictions in these countries with stand-alone mental health laws were included. Legislation was reviewed for gender-specific provisions.

Results: Seventy-five countries were evaluated; 71 jurisdictions were included. Thirty-eight jurisdictions had 88 gender-specific provisions. These addressed ten key areas, including: general gender-based protections, female representation on boards and review panels, protections during searching and restraint, gender separated facilities, protections in relation to parenting, fertility, sterilisation and termination. Fiji, Ghana, India, and the Australian jurisdictions had the highest number of gender-specific laws. However, gender-specific provisions are highly heterogeneous and are drafted from a cisnormative perspective and fail to adequately address the specific needs of individuals outside of that framework.

Conclusion: Gender-specific provisions can enhance the protections afforded by mental health law. However, as legislation can be a blunt instrument, careful consideration must be given to potential unintended consequences. During revisions of mental health law consideration should be given to gender-specific provisions and legislation must be inclusive of individuals identifying as transgender, non-binary and other genders.

心理健康立法中基于性别的规定:对英语司法管辖区的回顾。
目标:立法是促进心理保健的有力工具。性别是身心健康的一个重要社会决定因素。许多司法管辖区正在修订其心理健康法,以便与人权承诺保持一致。在这些修订中考虑到性别因素,可以提高女性、变性人和非二元个体所获得的心理保健服务。目的:本文研究了以英语出版的心理健康法中基于性别的规定:方法:确定以英语为官方语言的国家。方法:确定了以英语为官方语言的国家,并纳入了这些国家中拥有独立心理健康法律的司法管辖区。结果:评估了 75 个国家:对 75 个国家进行了评估,其中包括 71 个司法管辖区。38 个司法管辖区有 88 项针对不同性别的规定。这些规定涉及十个关键领域,包括:基于性别的一般保护、委员会和审查小组中的女性代表、搜查和限制期间的保护、性别隔离设施、与养育子女、生育、绝育和终止妊娠有关的保护。斐济、加纳、印度和澳大利亚司法管辖区的针对性别的法律数量最多。然而,有性别区分的条款差异很大,而且都是从顺式规范的角度起草的,未能充分满足该框架之外的个人的特殊需求:结论:有性别区分的条款可以加强心理健康法所提供的保护。然而,由于立法可能是一种钝器,因此必须仔细考虑潜在的意外后果。在修订心理健康法的过程中,应考虑到针对不同性别的规定,而且立法必须包容变性人、非二 元性别者和其他性别者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.90%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信