Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Predicts Respiratory Outcomes in Preterm Newborns with Late-Onset Sepsis: A Retrospective Study.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1159/000539526
Chiara Poggi, Davide Sarcina, Francesca Miselli, Martina Ciarcià, Carlo Dani
{"title":"Neonatal Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score Predicts Respiratory Outcomes in Preterm Newborns with Late-Onset Sepsis: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Chiara Poggi, Davide Sarcina, Francesca Miselli, Martina Ciarcià, Carlo Dani","doi":"10.1159/000539526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Neonatal sequential organ failure assessment (nSOFA) score predicts mortality in preterm newborns. The aim of the study was to assess whether nSOFA score could predict respiratory outcomes in preterm infants with late-onset sepsis (LOS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective, observational, single-center study enrolled infants with gestational age <32 weeks born between January 2016 and June 2023 who experienced an episode of LOS during NICU stay. The primary outcome was death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD); secondary outcomes were BPD, death or mechanical ventilation (MV) on day 5 after the onset of LOS, and MV on day 5 after the onset of LOS. The nSOFA score was assessed at the onset of LOS and after 6 ± 1, 12 ± 3, and 24 ± 3 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neonatal SOFA score was significantly higher in patients who developed each outcome versus those who did not at all timings. Maximal nSOFA score during the first 24 h after onset of LOS was an independent predictive factor for death or BPD (p = 0.007), BPD (p = 0.009), and death or MV on day 5 (p = 0.009), areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.740 (95% CI: 0.656-0.828), 0.700 (95% CI: 0.602-0.800), and 0.800 (95% CI: 0.710-0.889), respectively. Maximal nSOFA score also predicted moderate to severe BPD (p = 0.019) and death or moderate to severe BPD (p < 0.001). Maximal nSOFA ≥4 was associated with odds ratio (OR) of 7.37 (95% CI: 2.42-22.44) for death or BPD, 4.86 (95% CI: 1.54-15.28) for BPD, and 7.99 (95% CI: 3.47-18.36) for death or MV on day 5. AUC of the predicting model was 0.895 (95% CI: 0.801-0.928) for BPD, 0.897 (95% CI: 0.830-0.939) for death or BPD, 0.904 (95% CI: 0.851-0.956) for MV on day 5, 0.923 (95% CI: 0.892-0.973) for death or MV on day 5.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Maximal nSOFA score during the first 24 h after the onset of LOS predicts respiratory outcomes and allows identification of patients who may crucially benefit from lung-protective measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Neonatal sequential organ failure assessment (nSOFA) score predicts mortality in preterm newborns. The aim of the study was to assess whether nSOFA score could predict respiratory outcomes in preterm infants with late-onset sepsis (LOS).

Methods: This retrospective, observational, single-center study enrolled infants with gestational age <32 weeks born between January 2016 and June 2023 who experienced an episode of LOS during NICU stay. The primary outcome was death or bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD); secondary outcomes were BPD, death or mechanical ventilation (MV) on day 5 after the onset of LOS, and MV on day 5 after the onset of LOS. The nSOFA score was assessed at the onset of LOS and after 6 ± 1, 12 ± 3, and 24 ± 3 h.

Results: Neonatal SOFA score was significantly higher in patients who developed each outcome versus those who did not at all timings. Maximal nSOFA score during the first 24 h after onset of LOS was an independent predictive factor for death or BPD (p = 0.007), BPD (p = 0.009), and death or MV on day 5 (p = 0.009), areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.740 (95% CI: 0.656-0.828), 0.700 (95% CI: 0.602-0.800), and 0.800 (95% CI: 0.710-0.889), respectively. Maximal nSOFA score also predicted moderate to severe BPD (p = 0.019) and death or moderate to severe BPD (p < 0.001). Maximal nSOFA ≥4 was associated with odds ratio (OR) of 7.37 (95% CI: 2.42-22.44) for death or BPD, 4.86 (95% CI: 1.54-15.28) for BPD, and 7.99 (95% CI: 3.47-18.36) for death or MV on day 5. AUC of the predicting model was 0.895 (95% CI: 0.801-0.928) for BPD, 0.897 (95% CI: 0.830-0.939) for death or BPD, 0.904 (95% CI: 0.851-0.956) for MV on day 5, 0.923 (95% CI: 0.892-0.973) for death or MV on day 5.

Conclusion: Maximal nSOFA score during the first 24 h after the onset of LOS predicts respiratory outcomes and allows identification of patients who may crucially benefit from lung-protective measures.

新生儿序贯器官衰竭评估评分预测晚发败血症早产新生儿的呼吸系统预后:一项回顾性研究
简介新生儿序贯器官衰竭评估(nSOFA)评分可预测早产新生儿的死亡率。该研究旨在评估 nSOFA 评分能否预测晚期败血症(LOS)早产儿的呼吸系统预后:这项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究招募了胎龄为 3 个月的婴儿:在所有时间段,出现每种结果的患者的新生儿 SOFA 评分均明显高于未出现每种结果的患者。LOS 开始后 24 小时内的最大 nSOFA 评分是死亡或 BPD(p = 0.007)、BPD(p = 0.009)和第 5 天死亡或 MV(p = 0.009)的独立预测因素,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为 0.740(95% CI:0.656-0.828)、0.700(95% CI:0.602-0.800)和 0.800(95% CI:0.710-0.889)。最大 nSOFA 评分还可预测中度至重度 BPD(p = 0.019)和死亡或中度至重度 BPD(p < 0.001)。最大 nSOFA ≥4 与第 5 天死亡或 BPD 的几率比 (OR) 7.37(95% CI:2.42-22.44)、BPD 4.86(95% CI:1.54-15.28)和死亡或 MV 7.99(95% CI:3.47-18.36)相关。BPD 预测模型的 AUC 为 0.895(95% CI:0.801-0.928),死亡或 BPD 预测模型的 AUC 为 0.897(95% CI:0.830-0.939),第 5 天 MV 预测模型的 AUC 为 0.904(95% CI:0.851-0.956),第 5 天死亡或 MV 预测模型的 AUC 为 0.923(95% CI:0.892-0.973):LOS 开始后 24 小时内的最大 nSOFA 评分可预测呼吸系统的预后,并可识别出哪些患者可从肺保护措施中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信