Shared decision-making with patients with complex care needs: a scoping review.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
M E Perron, C Hudon, P H Roux-Levy, M E Poitras
{"title":"Shared decision-making with patients with complex care needs: a scoping review.","authors":"M E Perron, C Hudon, P H Roux-Levy, M E Poitras","doi":"10.1186/s12875-024-02633-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A number of patients have complex care needs that arise from interactions among multiple factors, such as multimorbidity, mental health issues, and social vulnerability. These factors influence decisions about healthcare and health services. Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative process between patients and professionals, is known to improve the quality of the decision-making process. However, follow-up challenges of patients with complex care needs (PCCNs) can lead to SDM specificities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify specificities of SDM with PCCNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. We conducted a systematic search across MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete databases. Empirical studies about SDM with PCCNs published between 1997 and 2023 were eligible for inclusion. We conducted a mixed thematic analysis using deductive (Ottawa Decision Support Framework and Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Model) and inductive approaches. Following Arksey & O'Malley's and Levac et al.'s methodological recommendations, we consulted experts (researchers, healthcare professionals, and patient partners) to enhance the findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies were included in the review. Overall, our results demonstrated the importance of recognizing some specificities of SDM with PCCNs, such as the simultaneous presence of multiple decisions and the multidisciplinary and intersectoral nature of the healthcare and health services they receive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review highlights some specificities that must be considered in SDM with PCCNs to maintain its already-known benefits and ensure positive health and decision-making outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11536959/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-024-02633-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A number of patients have complex care needs that arise from interactions among multiple factors, such as multimorbidity, mental health issues, and social vulnerability. These factors influence decisions about healthcare and health services. Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative process between patients and professionals, is known to improve the quality of the decision-making process. However, follow-up challenges of patients with complex care needs (PCCNs) can lead to SDM specificities.

Objective: To identify specificities of SDM with PCCNs.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. We conducted a systematic search across MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete databases. Empirical studies about SDM with PCCNs published between 1997 and 2023 were eligible for inclusion. We conducted a mixed thematic analysis using deductive (Ottawa Decision Support Framework and Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Model) and inductive approaches. Following Arksey & O'Malley's and Levac et al.'s methodological recommendations, we consulted experts (researchers, healthcare professionals, and patient partners) to enhance the findings.

Results: Twelve studies were included in the review. Overall, our results demonstrated the importance of recognizing some specificities of SDM with PCCNs, such as the simultaneous presence of multiple decisions and the multidisciplinary and intersectoral nature of the healthcare and health services they receive.

Conclusion: This scoping review highlights some specificities that must be considered in SDM with PCCNs to maintain its already-known benefits and ensure positive health and decision-making outcomes.

与有复杂护理需求的患者共同决策:范围界定综述。
背景:许多患者都有复杂的护理需求,这些需求是由多种因素相互作用而产生的,如多发病、精神健康问题和社会脆弱性。这些因素影响着医疗保健和医疗服务的决策。众所周知,共同决策(SDM)是患者与专业人员之间的合作过程,可提高决策过程的质量。然而,有复杂护理需求的患者(PCCNs)所面临的后续挑战可能会导致 SDM 的特殊性:确定有复杂护理需求患者的 SDM 的特殊性:我们采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)的方法进行了范围界定综述。我们在 MEDLINE、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 Academic Search Complete 数据库中进行了系统检索。1997 年至 2023 年间发表的有关 PCCN SDM 的经验性研究均符合纳入条件。我们采用演绎法(渥太华决策支持框架和跨专业共同决策模型)和归纳法进行了混合主题分析。根据 Arksey & O'Malley 和 Levac 等人的方法学建议,我们咨询了专家(研究人员、医护人员和患者伙伴),以完善研究结果:结果:12 项研究被纳入综述。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,认识到针对 PCCNs 的 SDM 的一些特殊性非常重要,例如同时存在多个决策以及他们所接受的医疗保健和健康服务的多学科和跨部门性质:本范围界定综述强调了在对幼儿保育和护理机构进行 SDM 时必须考虑的一些特殊性,以保持其已为人所知的益处并确保积极的健康和决策结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信