Thirty-day outcomes of endovascular repair of Stanford type B aortic dissection in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Vascular Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1177/17085381241298732
Renxi Li, Anton Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc Nguyen
{"title":"Thirty-day outcomes of endovascular repair of Stanford type B aortic dissection in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"Renxi Li, Anton Sidawy, Bao-Ngoc Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/17085381241298732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) has revolutionized the surgical treatment for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD). While chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with worse outcomes in major surgeries, the specific outcomes of TEVAR in patients with COPD have not been extensively explored. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day postoperative outcomes of COPD patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD utilizing data from a multi-institutional national registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2022. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to match demographics and preoperative characteristics between patients with and without COPD. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 172 (9.56%) and 1628 (90.44%) COPD and non-COPD patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD, respectively. Patients with COPD had a higher comorbidity burden. After the propensity-score matching, all 172 COPD patients were matched to 440 non-COPD patients. COPD and non-COPD patients had comparable mortality rates (10.12% vs 6.82%, <i>p</i> = .18). However, COPD patients had a higher risk of pulmonary complications (20.83% vs 13.18%, <i>p</i> = .02). All other 30-day outcomes were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>COPD patients had 58.04% higher pulmonary complications while all other 30-day outcomes were comparable to their non-COPD counterparts. Therefore, close monitoring and timely intervention for pulmonary complications in COPD patients can be important after TEVAR for TBAD. Future studies should investigate long-term outcomes among these COPD patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23549,"journal":{"name":"Vascular","volume":" ","pages":"17085381241298732"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17085381241298732","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) has revolutionized the surgical treatment for Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD). While chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with worse outcomes in major surgeries, the specific outcomes of TEVAR in patients with COPD have not been extensively explored. This study aimed to evaluate the 30-day postoperative outcomes of COPD patients undergoing TEVAR for TBAD utilizing data from a multi-institutional national registry.

Methods: Patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD were identified in the ACS-NSQIP database from 2005 to 2022. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to match demographics and preoperative characteristics between patients with and without COPD. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were compared.

Results: There were 172 (9.56%) and 1628 (90.44%) COPD and non-COPD patients who underwent TEVAR for TBAD, respectively. Patients with COPD had a higher comorbidity burden. After the propensity-score matching, all 172 COPD patients were matched to 440 non-COPD patients. COPD and non-COPD patients had comparable mortality rates (10.12% vs 6.82%, p = .18). However, COPD patients had a higher risk of pulmonary complications (20.83% vs 13.18%, p = .02). All other 30-day outcomes were similar between the two groups.

Conclusion: COPD patients had 58.04% higher pulmonary complications while all other 30-day outcomes were comparable to their non-COPD counterparts. Therefore, close monitoring and timely intervention for pulmonary complications in COPD patients can be important after TEVAR for TBAD. Future studies should investigate long-term outcomes among these COPD patients.

慢性阻塞性肺病患者斯坦福B型主动脉夹层血管内修复术后30天的疗效。
背景:胸腔内血管主动脉修复术(TEVAR)彻底改变了斯坦福B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)的手术治疗方法。虽然慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)与重大手术的不良预后有关,但 TEVAR 对 COPD 患者的具体预后尚未得到广泛探讨。本研究旨在利用多机构国家登记处的数据,评估因 TBAD 而接受 TEVAR 手术的 COPD 患者术后 30 天的预后:方法:2005 年至 2022 年期间,在 ACS-NSQIP 数据库中确定了接受 TEVAR 治疗 TBAD 的患者。采用1:3倾向得分匹配法对有慢性阻塞性肺病和无慢性阻塞性肺病的患者进行人口统计学和术前特征匹配。对术后30天的结果进行了比较:分别有172名(9.56%)和1628名(90.44%)慢性阻塞性肺病患者和非慢性阻塞性肺病患者接受了TEVAR治疗。慢性阻塞性肺病患者的合并症负担较重。经过倾向分数匹配后,所有 172 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者与 440 名非慢性阻塞性肺病患者进行了匹配。慢性阻塞性肺病患者和非慢性阻塞性肺病患者的死亡率相当(10.12% vs 6.82%,P = .18)。但是,慢性阻塞性肺病患者发生肺部并发症的风险更高(20.83% vs 13.18%,p = .02)。两组患者 30 天内的其他结果相似:结论:慢性阻塞性肺病患者的肺部并发症发生率比非慢性阻塞性肺病患者高出 58.04%,而 30 天内的其他结果与非慢性阻塞性肺病患者相当。因此,TBAD TEVAR术后密切监测并及时干预慢性阻塞性肺病患者的肺部并发症非常重要。未来的研究应调查这些慢性阻塞性肺病患者的长期预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular
Vascular 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
196
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vascular provides readers with new and unusual up-to-date articles and case reports focusing on vascular and endovascular topics. It is a highly international forum for the discussion and debate of all aspects of this distinct surgical specialty. It also features opinion pieces, literature reviews and controversial issues presented from various points of view.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信