Assessment of Facility Readiness for Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Utilizing a 2-Phase Survey Conducted in Six Hospitals in Uganda and Cameroon: A Quality Improvement Study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Bella Hwang, Jessica Trawin, Suiyven Dzelamunyuy, Matthew O Wiens, Abner Tagoola, Stephen Businge, Roberto Jabornisky, Odiraa Nwankwor, Gabrielle Karlovich, Tagbo Oguonu, Emmanuella Talla, Stefanie K Novakowski, Jollee S T Fung, Nicholas West, J Mark Ansermino, Niranjan Kissoon
{"title":"Assessment of Facility Readiness for Pediatric Emergency and Critical Care Utilizing a 2-Phase Survey Conducted in Six Hospitals in Uganda and Cameroon: A Quality Improvement Study.","authors":"Bella Hwang, Jessica Trawin, Suiyven Dzelamunyuy, Matthew O Wiens, Abner Tagoola, Stephen Businge, Roberto Jabornisky, Odiraa Nwankwor, Gabrielle Karlovich, Tagbo Oguonu, Emmanuella Talla, Stefanie K Novakowski, Jollee S T Fung, Nicholas West, J Mark Ansermino, Niranjan Kissoon","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Each year, 5.3 million children under 5 years of age die in low-resource settings, often due to delayed recognition of disease severity, inadequate treatment, or a lack of supplies. We describe the use of a comprehensive digital facility-readiness survey tool, recently developed by the Pediatric Sepsis Data CoLaboratory, which aims to identify target areas for quality improvement related to pediatric emergency and critical care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Facility-readiness surveys were conducted at six sub-Saharan African hospitals providing pediatric emergency and critical care in Uganda (n = 4) and Cameroon (n = 2). The tool is a 2-phase survey to assess readiness to provide pediatric essential emergency and critical care: (1) an \"environmental scan,\" focusing on infrastructure, availability, and functionality of resources, and (2) an \"observational scan\" assessing the quality and safety of care through direct observation of patients receiving treatment for common diseases. Data were captured in a mobile application and the findings analyzed descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Varying levels of facility readiness to provide pediatric emergency care were observed. Only 1 of 6 facilities had a qualified staff member to assess children for danger signs upon arrival, and only 2 of 6 had staff with skills to manage emergency conditions. Only 21% of essential medicines required for pediatric emergency and critical care were available at all six facilities. Most facilities had clean running water and soap or disinfectants, but most also experienced interruptions to their electricity supply. Less than half of patients received an appropriate discharge note and fewer received counseling on postdischarge care; follow-up was arranged in less than a quarter of cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These pilot findings indicate that facilities are partially equipped and ready to provide pediatric emergency and critical care. This facility-readiness tool can be utilized in low-resource settings to assist hospital administrators and policymakers to determine priority areas to improve quality of care for the critically ill child.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003276","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Each year, 5.3 million children under 5 years of age die in low-resource settings, often due to delayed recognition of disease severity, inadequate treatment, or a lack of supplies. We describe the use of a comprehensive digital facility-readiness survey tool, recently developed by the Pediatric Sepsis Data CoLaboratory, which aims to identify target areas for quality improvement related to pediatric emergency and critical care.

Methods: Facility-readiness surveys were conducted at six sub-Saharan African hospitals providing pediatric emergency and critical care in Uganda (n = 4) and Cameroon (n = 2). The tool is a 2-phase survey to assess readiness to provide pediatric essential emergency and critical care: (1) an "environmental scan," focusing on infrastructure, availability, and functionality of resources, and (2) an "observational scan" assessing the quality and safety of care through direct observation of patients receiving treatment for common diseases. Data were captured in a mobile application and the findings analyzed descriptively.

Results: Varying levels of facility readiness to provide pediatric emergency care were observed. Only 1 of 6 facilities had a qualified staff member to assess children for danger signs upon arrival, and only 2 of 6 had staff with skills to manage emergency conditions. Only 21% of essential medicines required for pediatric emergency and critical care were available at all six facilities. Most facilities had clean running water and soap or disinfectants, but most also experienced interruptions to their electricity supply. Less than half of patients received an appropriate discharge note and fewer received counseling on postdischarge care; follow-up was arranged in less than a quarter of cases.

Conclusions: These pilot findings indicate that facilities are partially equipped and ready to provide pediatric emergency and critical care. This facility-readiness tool can be utilized in low-resource settings to assist hospital administrators and policymakers to determine priority areas to improve quality of care for the critically ill child.

通过在乌干达和喀麦隆六家医院开展的两阶段调查,评估儿科急诊和重症监护设施的准备情况:质量改进研究。
目标:每年有 530 万名 5 岁以下儿童死于资源匮乏的环境中,这通常是由于对疾病严重性的认识延迟、治疗不充分或缺乏供应造成的。我们介绍了儿科败血症数据联合实验室(Pediatric Sepsis Data CoLaboratory)最近开发的综合数字设施准备情况调查工具的使用情况,该工具旨在确定儿科急诊和危重症护理质量改进的目标领域:在乌干达(4 家)和喀麦隆(2 家)的 6 家撒哈拉以南非洲地区提供儿科急诊和重症监护的医院进行了设施准备情况调查。该工具分两个阶段进行调查,以评估提供儿科基本急诊和危重症护理的准备情况:(1)"环境扫描",重点是基础设施、资源的可用性和功能性;(2)"观察扫描",通过直接观察接受常见疾病治疗的患者,评估护理的质量和安全性。数据通过移动应用程序采集,并对结果进行描述性分析:结果:观察发现,提供儿科急诊服务的机构准备程度各不相同。在 6 家医疗机构中,只有 1 家有合格的工作人员在儿童到达时对其危险征兆进行评估,6 家医疗机构中只有 2 家有具备处理紧急情况技能的工作人员。在所有 6 家医疗机构中,只有 21% 的医疗机构备有儿科急诊和重症监护所需的基本药物。大多数医疗机构都有干净的自来水、肥皂或消毒剂,但大多数医疗机构的电力供应也曾中断过。不到一半的患者收到了适当的出院通知单,更少的患者得到了出院后护理方面的咨询;不到四分之一的病例安排了后续治疗:这些试点结果表明,医疗机构在提供儿科急诊和危重症护理方面具备部分设备和条件。在资源匮乏的环境中,可以利用这一设施准备工具来协助医院管理者和决策者确定优先领域,以提高危重症儿童的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信