Optimizing Hierarchical Condition Category-Risk Adjustment Factor Management in Population Health Using Rapid Process Improvement Methods.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Karri L Benjamin, Brett C Meyer, Jeff Pan, Susie R Guidi, Shivon Carreño, Khai Nguyen, Heather Hofflich, Nathan C Timmerman, Constance Eckenrodt, Usha Kollipara, Leann Lopez, Michelle G Albright, Matthew P Satre, Eileen M Haley, Parag Agnihotri
{"title":"Optimizing Hierarchical Condition Category-Risk Adjustment Factor Management in Population Health Using Rapid Process Improvement Methods.","authors":"Karri L Benjamin, Brett C Meyer, Jeff Pan, Susie R Guidi, Shivon Carreño, Khai Nguyen, Heather Hofflich, Nathan C Timmerman, Constance Eckenrodt, Usha Kollipara, Leann Lopez, Michelle G Albright, Matthew P Satre, Eileen M Haley, Parag Agnihotri","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services provides reimbursement through Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) coding. Medical systems strive toward risk adjustment optimization, often implementing costly chart review processes. Previously, our organization implementing countermeasures through workflows was complex and performed in silos. Our goal was to put in place HCC-Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) improvement tools to optimize HCC-RAF management in Population Health using rapid process improvement methods. In this quality improvement analysis (IRB#806198), we used Lean methodology to develop tools and implement streamlined processes for providers to manage, document, and code high-risk HCC conditions. Rather than applying costly countermeasures, Transformational Healthcare conducted a Rapid Process Improvement Workshop (RPIW), with workgroups implementing proposed changes, to improve processes. Each of these tools was embedded in standard work, for teams to use in practice. Tools included the development of RPIW-inspired work groups, a Provider Education website, tip sheets, clinical champions, trainings, audits, practice alerts, smart phrases, schedule view tools, severity scores, reports, dashboards, on-screen decision-support tools, coding expertise, and HCC standard work. Quantitatively, Year 1 showed enterprise HCC-RAF scores improved by 4.1%. We were able to develop tools for providers and team members to allow for more optimized pathways. Although quantitatively we realized an improvement in enterprise HCC-RAF score, our overall aim was to improve process flow and limit waste. Leveraging Lean improvement methods for the collective design of tools has supported culture change. In the end, we found that providers are indeed willing to adopt these newly built tools. These tools have optimized operations, allowing providers to work smarter, not harder.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2024.0147","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services provides reimbursement through Hierarchical Condition Category (HCC) coding. Medical systems strive toward risk adjustment optimization, often implementing costly chart review processes. Previously, our organization implementing countermeasures through workflows was complex and performed in silos. Our goal was to put in place HCC-Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) improvement tools to optimize HCC-RAF management in Population Health using rapid process improvement methods. In this quality improvement analysis (IRB#806198), we used Lean methodology to develop tools and implement streamlined processes for providers to manage, document, and code high-risk HCC conditions. Rather than applying costly countermeasures, Transformational Healthcare conducted a Rapid Process Improvement Workshop (RPIW), with workgroups implementing proposed changes, to improve processes. Each of these tools was embedded in standard work, for teams to use in practice. Tools included the development of RPIW-inspired work groups, a Provider Education website, tip sheets, clinical champions, trainings, audits, practice alerts, smart phrases, schedule view tools, severity scores, reports, dashboards, on-screen decision-support tools, coding expertise, and HCC standard work. Quantitatively, Year 1 showed enterprise HCC-RAF scores improved by 4.1%. We were able to develop tools for providers and team members to allow for more optimized pathways. Although quantitatively we realized an improvement in enterprise HCC-RAF score, our overall aim was to improve process flow and limit waste. Leveraging Lean improvement methods for the collective design of tools has supported culture change. In the end, we found that providers are indeed willing to adopt these newly built tools. These tools have optimized operations, allowing providers to work smarter, not harder.

利用快速流程改进方法优化人群健康中的分级病情类别-风险调整因子管理。
美国医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services)通过分级病情类别(HCC)编码提供报销。医疗系统努力优化风险调整,经常实施昂贵的病历审查流程。以前,我们的组织通过工作流程实施对策非常复杂,而且是各自为政。我们的目标是建立 HCC 风险调整因子(RAF)改进工具,利用快速流程改进方法优化人口健康中的 HCC-RAF 管理。在这项质量改进分析(IRB#806198)中,我们使用精益方法开发工具并实施简化流程,以便医疗服务提供者管理、记录和编码高风险 HCC 病症。Transformational Healthcare 没有采用成本高昂的对策,而是开展了快速流程改进研讨会 (RPIW),由工作组实施建议的变更,以改进流程。这些工具中的每一项都嵌入了标准工作,供团队在实践中使用。这些工具包括开发 RPIW 启发的工作组、提供方教育网站、提示单、临床倡导者、培训、审计、实践警报、智能短语、日程查看工具、严重程度评分、报告、仪表板、屏幕决策支持工具、编码专业知识和 HCC 标准工作。从数量上看,第一年的企业 HCC-RAF 分数提高了 4.1%。我们能够为医疗服务提供者和团队成员开发工具,使路径更加优化。虽然在数量上,我们实现了企业 HCC-RAF 分数的提高,但我们的总体目标是改善流程和限制浪费。利用精益改进方法来集体设计工具有助于文化的改变。最后,我们发现医疗服务提供者确实愿意采用这些新建的工具。这些工具优化了操作,让医疗服务提供者能够更聪明地工作,而不是更辛苦地工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Population Health Management
Population Health Management 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices. Population Health Management coverage includes: Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions Compliance programs Health economics Outcomes assessment Provider incentives Health care reform Resource management Return on investment (ROI) Health care quality Care coordination.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信