An investigation to improve a nonlinear mixed-effects approach for EC50 estimation based on multi-donor dose-response data.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Weiliang Qiu, Cheng Wenren, Els Pattyn, Tamara Slavnic, Luc Esserméant
{"title":"An investigation to improve a nonlinear mixed-effects approach for EC50 estimation based on multi-donor dose-response data.","authors":"Weiliang Qiu, Cheng Wenren, Els Pattyn, Tamara Slavnic, Luc Esserméant","doi":"10.1080/10543406.2024.2421424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dose-response relationships are important in assessing the efficacy and potency of compounds, which can usually be characterized by a 4-parameter logistic (4-PL) model estimating EC50, slope factor, lower asymptote, and upper asymptote. EC50, the concentration of a compound that induces a response halfway between the baseline and maximum, is a key quantity to evaluate compound potency. For multi-donor dose-response data, it is often of interest to estimate the overall EC50 (i.e. the average EC50 of the population of donors) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). A few multi-donor EC50 estimation methods have been proposed in the literature. Jiang and Kopp-Schneider (2014) systematically compared the meta-analysis approach and the nonlinear mixed-effects approach and concluded that the meta-analysis approach is simple and robust to summarize EC50 estimates from multiple experiments, especially suited in the case of a small number of experiments, while the nonlinear mixed-effects approach has the issue of convergence failures probably due to overparameterization. In this article, we propose a modification of the nonlinear mixed-effects approach by using the stochastic approximation expectation-maximization (SAEM) algorithm to estimate model parameters and using multiple starting points to search for globally optimal values, which can substantially alleviate the issue of convergence failures even for small number of donors (e.g. <i>n</i> = 3), and achieve a smaller absolute median bias and better coverage probability of 95% confidence interval than the meta-analysis approach when the number of donors is not too small (e.g. <i>n</i> ≥ 7).</p>","PeriodicalId":54870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2421424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dose-response relationships are important in assessing the efficacy and potency of compounds, which can usually be characterized by a 4-parameter logistic (4-PL) model estimating EC50, slope factor, lower asymptote, and upper asymptote. EC50, the concentration of a compound that induces a response halfway between the baseline and maximum, is a key quantity to evaluate compound potency. For multi-donor dose-response data, it is often of interest to estimate the overall EC50 (i.e. the average EC50 of the population of donors) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). A few multi-donor EC50 estimation methods have been proposed in the literature. Jiang and Kopp-Schneider (2014) systematically compared the meta-analysis approach and the nonlinear mixed-effects approach and concluded that the meta-analysis approach is simple and robust to summarize EC50 estimates from multiple experiments, especially suited in the case of a small number of experiments, while the nonlinear mixed-effects approach has the issue of convergence failures probably due to overparameterization. In this article, we propose a modification of the nonlinear mixed-effects approach by using the stochastic approximation expectation-maximization (SAEM) algorithm to estimate model parameters and using multiple starting points to search for globally optimal values, which can substantially alleviate the issue of convergence failures even for small number of donors (e.g. n = 3), and achieve a smaller absolute median bias and better coverage probability of 95% confidence interval than the meta-analysis approach when the number of donors is not too small (e.g. n ≥ 7).

基于多供体剂量反应数据的 EC50 估算非线性混合效应方法的改进研究。
剂量-反应关系对于评估化合物的药效和效力非常重要,通常可通过估算 EC50、斜率因子、下渐近线和上渐近线的 4 参数对数(4-PL)模型来表征。EC50 是诱导基线与最大值之间一半反应的化合物浓度,是评估化合物效价的关键指标。对于多供体剂量反应数据,通常需要估算总体 EC50(即供体群体的平均 EC50)及其 95% 置信区间 (CI)。文献中提出了一些多供体 EC50 估算方法。Jiang 和 Kopp-Schneider(2014 年)系统地比较了荟萃分析法和非线性混合效应法,认为荟萃分析法简单、稳健,可总结多个实验的 EC50 估计值,尤其适用于实验数量较少的情况;而非线性混合效应法可能由于参数化过度而存在收敛失败的问题。在本文中,我们提出了对非线性混合效应方法的一种改进,即使用随机逼近期望最大化(SAEM)算法来估计模型参数,并使用多个起点来搜索全局最优值。当捐献者人数不太多时(如 n≥ 7),与元分析方法相比,绝对中值偏差更小,95% 置信区间的覆盖概率更高。)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, a rapid publication journal, discusses quality applications of statistics in biopharmaceutical research and development. Now publishing six times per year, it includes expositions of statistical methodology with immediate applicability to biopharmaceutical research in the form of full-length and short manuscripts, review articles, selected/invited conference papers, short articles, and letters to the editor. Addressing timely and provocative topics important to the biostatistical profession, the journal covers: Drug, device, and biological research and development; Drug screening and drug design; Assessment of pharmacological activity; Pharmaceutical formulation and scale-up; Preclinical safety assessment; Bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetics; Phase, I, II, and III clinical development including complex innovative designs; Premarket approval assessment of clinical safety; Postmarketing surveillance; Big data and artificial intelligence and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信