Postmarketing Surveillance of Inferior Vena Cava Filters Among US Medicare Beneficiaries: The SAFE-IVC Study.

Q1 Medicine
Enrico G Ferro, Julie B Mackel, Renee D Kramer, Rebecca Torguson, Eleni M Whatley, Gregory O'Connell, Brian Pullin, Nathan W Watson, Siling Li, Yang Song, Anna K Krawisz, Brett J Carroll, Marc L Schermerhorn, Jeffrey L Weinstein, Andrew Farb, Bram Zuckerman, Robert W Yeh, Eric A Secemsky
{"title":"Postmarketing Surveillance of Inferior Vena Cava Filters Among US Medicare Beneficiaries: The SAFE-IVC Study.","authors":"Enrico G Ferro, Julie B Mackel, Renee D Kramer, Rebecca Torguson, Eleni M Whatley, Gregory O'Connell, Brian Pullin, Nathan W Watson, Siling Li, Yang Song, Anna K Krawisz, Brett J Carroll, Marc L Schermerhorn, Jeffrey L Weinstein, Andrew Farb, Bram Zuckerman, Robert W Yeh, Eric A Secemsky","doi":"10.1001/jama.2024.19553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) are commonly used to prevent pulmonary embolism in selected clinical scenarios, despite limited evidence to support their use. Current recommendations from professional societies and the US Food and Drug Administration endorse timely IVCF retrieval when clinically feasible. Current IVCF treatment patterns and outcomes remain poorly described.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate temporal trends and practice patterns in IVCF insertion and retrieval among older US patients and report the incidence of periprocedural and long-term safety events of indwelling and retrieved IVCFs.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>Prespecified, retrospective, observational cohort of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries, leveraging 100% of samples of inpatient and outpatient claims data from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2021.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>First-time IVCF insertion while insured by Medicare FFS.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary safety outcome was the composite of all-cause death, filter-related complications (eg, fracture, embolization), operating room visits following filter-related procedures, or new diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Events were considered periprocedural if they occurred within 30 days of IVCF insertion or retrieval and long-term if they occurred more than 30 days after.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 270 866 patients with IVCFs placed during the study period (mean age, 75.1 years; 52.8% female), 64.9% were inserted for first-time venous thromboembolism (VTE), 26.3% for recurrent VTE, and 8.8% for VTE prophylaxis. Of these patients, 63.3% had major bleeds or trauma within 30 days of IVCF insertion. The volume of insertions decreased from 44 680 per year in 2013 to 19 501 per year in 2021. The cumulative incidence of retrieval was 15.3% at a median of 1.2 years and 16.8% at maximum follow-up of 9.0 years. Older age, more comorbidities, and Black race were associated with a decreased likelihood of retrieval, whereas placement at a large teaching hospital was associated with an increased likelihood of retrieval. The incidence of caval thrombosis and DVT among patients with nonretrieved IVCFs was 2.2% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.3%) and 9.2% (95% CI, 9.0%-9.3%), respectively. The majority (93.5%) of retrieval attempts were successful, with low incidence of 30-day complications (mortality, 0.7% [95% CI, 0.6%-0.8%]; filter-related complications, 1.4% [95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this large, US real-world analysis, IVCF insertion declined, yet retrievals remained low. Strategies to increase timely retrieval are needed, as nonretrieved IVCFs may have long-term complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":17196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11541742/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2024.19553","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) are commonly used to prevent pulmonary embolism in selected clinical scenarios, despite limited evidence to support their use. Current recommendations from professional societies and the US Food and Drug Administration endorse timely IVCF retrieval when clinically feasible. Current IVCF treatment patterns and outcomes remain poorly described.

Objectives: To evaluate temporal trends and practice patterns in IVCF insertion and retrieval among older US patients and report the incidence of periprocedural and long-term safety events of indwelling and retrieved IVCFs.

Design, setting, and participants: Prespecified, retrospective, observational cohort of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries, leveraging 100% of samples of inpatient and outpatient claims data from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2021.

Exposure: First-time IVCF insertion while insured by Medicare FFS.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary safety outcome was the composite of all-cause death, filter-related complications (eg, fracture, embolization), operating room visits following filter-related procedures, or new diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Events were considered periprocedural if they occurred within 30 days of IVCF insertion or retrieval and long-term if they occurred more than 30 days after.

Results: Among 270 866 patients with IVCFs placed during the study period (mean age, 75.1 years; 52.8% female), 64.9% were inserted for first-time venous thromboembolism (VTE), 26.3% for recurrent VTE, and 8.8% for VTE prophylaxis. Of these patients, 63.3% had major bleeds or trauma within 30 days of IVCF insertion. The volume of insertions decreased from 44 680 per year in 2013 to 19 501 per year in 2021. The cumulative incidence of retrieval was 15.3% at a median of 1.2 years and 16.8% at maximum follow-up of 9.0 years. Older age, more comorbidities, and Black race were associated with a decreased likelihood of retrieval, whereas placement at a large teaching hospital was associated with an increased likelihood of retrieval. The incidence of caval thrombosis and DVT among patients with nonretrieved IVCFs was 2.2% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.3%) and 9.2% (95% CI, 9.0%-9.3%), respectively. The majority (93.5%) of retrieval attempts were successful, with low incidence of 30-day complications (mortality, 0.7% [95% CI, 0.6%-0.8%]; filter-related complications, 1.4% [95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%]).

Conclusions and relevance: In this large, US real-world analysis, IVCF insertion declined, yet retrievals remained low. Strategies to increase timely retrieval are needed, as nonretrieved IVCFs may have long-term complications.

美国医疗保险受益人下腔静脉滤器上市后监测:SAFE-IVC 研究。
重要性:尽管支持使用下腔静脉滤器(IVCF)的证据有限,但下腔静脉滤器通常在特定临床情况下用于预防肺栓塞。目前,专业协会和美国食品药品管理局建议在临床可行的情况下及时取出下腔静脉滤器。目前对 IVCF 治疗模式和结果的描述仍然很少:评估美国老年患者 IVCF 插入和取出的时间趋势和实践模式,并报告留置和取出 IVCF 的围手术期和长期安全事件的发生率:利用 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日期间住院病人和门诊病人报销数据的 100% 样本,对医疗保险付费服务 (FFS) 受益人进行预设、回顾性、观察性队列研究:主要结果和测量指标:主要安全性结果是全因死亡、过滤器相关并发症(如骨折、栓塞)、过滤器相关手术后的手术室就诊或新诊断的深静脉血栓(DVT)的综合结果。如果事件发生在IVCF插入或取出后30天内,则被视为围手术期事件;如果事件发生在IVCF插入或取出后30天以上,则被视为长期事件:在研究期间置入IVCF的270 866名患者中(平均年龄75.1岁;52.8%为女性),64.9%是首次置入静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE),26.3%是复发性VTE,8.8%是预防VTE。在这些患者中,63.3%的患者在植入 IVCF 后 30 天内出现大出血或外伤。插入量从 2013 年的每年 44 680 例降至 2021 年的每年 19 501 例。在1.2年的中位随访中,取回IVCF的累积发生率为15.3%,在最长9.0年的随访中,取回IVCF的累积发生率为16.8%。年龄越大、合并症越多、黑人种族越多,取栓的可能性就越小,而在大型教学医院就医则取栓的可能性越大。在未取出 IVCF 的患者中,腔隙血栓和深静脉血栓的发生率分别为 2.2% (95% CI, 2.1%-2.3%) 和 9.2% (95% CI, 9.0%-9.3%) 。大多数(93.5%)取管尝试成功,30天并发症发生率较低(死亡率为0.7% [95% CI, 0.6%-0.8%]; 过滤器相关并发症为1.4% [95% CI, 1.2%-1.5%]):在这项大型美国真实世界分析中,IVCF插入率有所下降,但取回率仍然很低。由于未取回的 IVCF 可能会产生长期并发症,因此需要制定策略以提高及时取回率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
45.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA, published continuously since 1883, is an international peer-reviewed general medical journal. JAMA is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信