Team and Electronic Health Record Features and Burnout Among Family Physicians.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lisa S Rotenstein, Nathaniel Hendrix, Robert L Phillips, Julia Adler-Milstein
{"title":"Team and Electronic Health Record Features and Burnout Among Family Physicians.","authors":"Lisa S Rotenstein, Nathaniel Hendrix, Robert L Phillips, Julia Adler-Milstein","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>In the context of a growing volume of electronic health record (EHR)-based work and post-COVID-19 pandemic staffing pressures, health system leaders need an up-to-date understanding of changes in family physicians' experiences of burnout, determinants of burnout, and how to enhance the family physicians' experience.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association of family physicians' perceptions of team structure and EHR experiences with burnout and identify modifiable practice structure factors associated with team and EHR experiences.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A serial cross-sectional survey study was conducted from December 1, 2016, to October 24, 2023. Participants included family physicians seeking continuous certification through the American Board of Family Medicine.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Yearly prevalence of burnout, perceived team efficiency, perceived EHR proficiency, and perceived EHR time were the outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models subsequently assessed associations of team- and EHR-related experiences with burnout and the association between practice structure and staffing features in team efficiency and EHR time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 10 315 physicians who answered the subset of questions related to burnout on the American Board of Family Medicine's Continuous Certification Questionnaire between 2017 and 2023. Among the sample, 5584 respondents (54.1%) were male, and the median age was 50 (IQR, 43-58) years. The proportion of physicians reporting burnout ranged from 37.9% in 2017 to a peak of 42.8% in 2022, which did not represent a significant temporal trend (P = .91). Appropriate home EHR use was associated with 0.58 (95% CI, 0.53-0.64; P < .001) times the odds of burnout, while high team efficiency was associated with 0.61 (95% CI, 0.56-0.67; P < .001) times the odds of burnout. Physician collaboration with a registered nurse was associated with greater odds of high team efficiency (odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22-1.50). Collaboration with a physician assistant was associated with greater odds of appropriate home EHR time (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this national cross-sectional study of US family physicians, appropriate time spent on the EHR at home and primary care team efficiency were associated with lower odds of burnout. These findings suggest that clinical leaders and policymakers should focus on optimizing primary care team support and family physicians' EHR experiences to enhance the sustainability of primary care practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"7 11","pages":"e2442687"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42687","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: In the context of a growing volume of electronic health record (EHR)-based work and post-COVID-19 pandemic staffing pressures, health system leaders need an up-to-date understanding of changes in family physicians' experiences of burnout, determinants of burnout, and how to enhance the family physicians' experience.

Objective: To evaluate the association of family physicians' perceptions of team structure and EHR experiences with burnout and identify modifiable practice structure factors associated with team and EHR experiences.

Design, setting, and participants: A serial cross-sectional survey study was conducted from December 1, 2016, to October 24, 2023. Participants included family physicians seeking continuous certification through the American Board of Family Medicine.

Main outcomes and measures: Yearly prevalence of burnout, perceived team efficiency, perceived EHR proficiency, and perceived EHR time were the outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression models subsequently assessed associations of team- and EHR-related experiences with burnout and the association between practice structure and staffing features in team efficiency and EHR time.

Results: The study included 10 315 physicians who answered the subset of questions related to burnout on the American Board of Family Medicine's Continuous Certification Questionnaire between 2017 and 2023. Among the sample, 5584 respondents (54.1%) were male, and the median age was 50 (IQR, 43-58) years. The proportion of physicians reporting burnout ranged from 37.9% in 2017 to a peak of 42.8% in 2022, which did not represent a significant temporal trend (P = .91). Appropriate home EHR use was associated with 0.58 (95% CI, 0.53-0.64; P < .001) times the odds of burnout, while high team efficiency was associated with 0.61 (95% CI, 0.56-0.67; P < .001) times the odds of burnout. Physician collaboration with a registered nurse was associated with greater odds of high team efficiency (odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% CI, 1.22-1.50). Collaboration with a physician assistant was associated with greater odds of appropriate home EHR time (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.24).

Conclusions and relevance: In this national cross-sectional study of US family physicians, appropriate time spent on the EHR at home and primary care team efficiency were associated with lower odds of burnout. These findings suggest that clinical leaders and policymakers should focus on optimizing primary care team support and family physicians' EHR experiences to enhance the sustainability of primary care practice.

团队和电子健康记录功能与家庭医生的职业倦怠。
重要性:在基于电子健康记录(EHR)的工作量不断增加以及后 COVID-19 大流行的人员编制压力的背景下,医疗系统的领导者需要对家庭医生职业倦怠经历的变化、职业倦怠的决定因素以及如何提高家庭医生的职业倦怠经历有一个最新的了解:评估家庭医生对团队结构和电子病历体验的看法与职业倦怠的关系,并确定与团队和电子病历体验相关的可修改的实践结构因素:从 2016 年 12 月 1 日至 2023 年 10 月 24 日开展了一项连续横断面调查研究。参与者包括正在申请美国全科医学委员会连续认证的家庭医生:主要结果和测量指标:每年的职业倦怠发生率、感知的团队效率、感知的电子病历熟练程度和感知的电子病历时间。多变量逻辑回归模型随后评估了团队和电子病历相关经历与职业倦怠的关联,以及团队效率和电子病历时间方面的实践结构和人员配置特征之间的关联:研究纳入了 10 315 名医生,他们在 2017 年至 2023 年间回答了美国全科医学委员会连续认证问卷中与职业倦怠相关的问题子集。样本中有 5584 名受访者(54.1%)为男性,年龄中位数为 50 岁(IQR,43-58)。报告职业倦怠的医生比例从 2017 年的 37.9% 到 2022 年的峰值 42.8%,并不代表显著的时间趋势(P = .91)。适当使用家用电子病历与倦怠相关度为 0.58(95% CI,0.53-0.64;P 结论及意义:在这项针对美国家庭医生的全国性横断面研究中,在家中使用电子病历的适当时间和初级保健团队的效率与较低的职业倦怠几率有关。这些研究结果表明,临床领导者和政策制定者应注重优化初级医疗团队的支持和家庭医生的电子病历体验,以提高初级医疗实践的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信