Clinical commissioning and introduction of an in-house artificial intelligence (AI) platform for automated head and neck intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Xinyi Li, Yang Sheng, Qingrong Jackie Wu, Yaorong Ge, David M Brizel, Yvonne M Mowery, Dongrong Yang, Fang-Fang Yin, Qiuwen Wu
{"title":"Clinical commissioning and introduction of an in-house artificial intelligence (AI) platform for automated head and neck intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning.","authors":"Xinyi Li, Yang Sheng, Qingrong Jackie Wu, Yaorong Ge, David M Brizel, Yvonne M Mowery, Dongrong Yang, Fang-Fang Yin, Qiuwen Wu","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>To describe the clinical commissioning of an in-house artificial intelligence (AI) treatment planning platform for head-and-neck (HN) Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The AI planning platform has three components: (1) a graphical user interface (GUI) is built within the framework of a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). The GUI allows AI models to run remotely on a designated workstation configured with GPU acceleration. (2) A template plan is automatically prepared involving both clinical and AI considerations, which include contour evaluation, isocenter placement, and beam/collimator jaw placement. (3) A well-orchestrated suite of AI models predicts optimal fluence maps, which are imported into TPS for dose calculation followed by an optional automatic fine-tuning. Six AI models provide flexible tradeoffs in parotid sparing and Planning Target Volume (PTV)-organ-at-risk (OAR) preferences. Planners could examine the plan dose distribution and make further modifications as clinically needed. The performance of the AI plans was compared to the corresponding clinical plans.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average plan generation time including manual operations was 10-15  min per case, with each AI model prediction taking ∼1 s. The six AI plans form a wide range of tradeoff choices between left and right parotids and between PTV and OARs compared with corresponding clinical plans, which correctly reflected their tradeoff designs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The in-house AI IMRT treatment planning platform was developed and is available for clinical use at our institution. The process demonstrates outstanding performance and robustness of the AI platform and provides sufficient validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e14558"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14558","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: To describe the clinical commissioning of an in-house artificial intelligence (AI) treatment planning platform for head-and-neck (HN) Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT).

Materials and methods: The AI planning platform has three components: (1) a graphical user interface (GUI) is built within the framework of a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). The GUI allows AI models to run remotely on a designated workstation configured with GPU acceleration. (2) A template plan is automatically prepared involving both clinical and AI considerations, which include contour evaluation, isocenter placement, and beam/collimator jaw placement. (3) A well-orchestrated suite of AI models predicts optimal fluence maps, which are imported into TPS for dose calculation followed by an optional automatic fine-tuning. Six AI models provide flexible tradeoffs in parotid sparing and Planning Target Volume (PTV)-organ-at-risk (OAR) preferences. Planners could examine the plan dose distribution and make further modifications as clinically needed. The performance of the AI plans was compared to the corresponding clinical plans.

Results: The average plan generation time including manual operations was 10-15  min per case, with each AI model prediction taking ∼1 s. The six AI plans form a wide range of tradeoff choices between left and right parotids and between PTV and OARs compared with corresponding clinical plans, which correctly reflected their tradeoff designs.

Conclusion: The in-house AI IMRT treatment planning platform was developed and is available for clinical use at our institution. The process demonstrates outstanding performance and robustness of the AI platform and provides sufficient validation.

临床调试和引入内部人工智能(AI)平台,实现头颈部调强放射治疗(IMRT)的自动治疗规划。
背景和目的:描述头颈部(HN)调强放射治疗(IMRT)内部人工智能(AI)治疗计划平台的临床调试情况:人工智能计划平台由三个部分组成:(1) 在商业治疗计划系统(TPS)的框架内建立图形用户界面(GUI)。该图形用户界面允许人工智能模型在配置了 GPU 加速的指定工作站上远程运行。(2) 自动准备模板计划,包括临床和人工智能考虑因素,其中包括轮廓评估、等中心位置和光束/准直器颚骨位置。(3) 一套精心设计的人工智能模型可预测最佳通量图,并将其导入 TPS 进行剂量计算,然后进行可选的自动微调。六种人工智能模型可灵活权衡腮腺疏松和规划靶体积(PTV)-风险器官(OAR)偏好。计划人员可以检查计划剂量分布,并根据临床需要进一步修改。人工智能计划的性能与相应的临床计划进行了比较:包括人工操作在内,每个病例的平均计划生成时间为 10-15 分钟,每个人工智能模型的预测时间为 1 秒。与相应的临床计划相比,六个人工智能计划在左右腮腺之间以及 PTV 和 OAR 之间形成了广泛的权衡选择,正确反映了其权衡设计:结论:我院已开发出内部人工智能 IMRT 治疗规划平台,并已投入临床使用。该过程展示了人工智能平台的卓越性能和稳健性,并提供了充分的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信