Carbon footprinting and sustainability impact assessment in urological surgical practice - A systematic review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Mudassir Wani, Sanjeev Madaan, Gareth Brown, Martin Steggall, Ghulam Nabi
{"title":"Carbon footprinting and sustainability impact assessment in urological surgical practice - A systematic review.","authors":"Mudassir Wani, Sanjeev Madaan, Gareth Brown, Martin Steggall, Ghulam Nabi","doi":"10.1177/00369330241280206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically synthesize existing reported literature calculating the carbon footprint (CFP) of urological surgical practice and identify opportunities for improving the environmental impact of urology surgical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched between 1971 and 2023, with inclusion and exclusion criteria. The outcome measures were mapped across the included studies including assessment of risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 345 studies with titles were identified from an initial search, however only 5 were included. Three studies compared singleuse with reusable cystoscopes concluded that single-use cystoscopes are non-inferior to reusable cystoscopes environmentally due to the carbon footprint associated with decontamination and repackaging. Similarly, in a single study, the CFP of single-use and reusable ureteroscopes is comparable. Lastly, a single study concluded that robotics-assisted surgery in prostate cancer may be a better option than other approaches in terms of environmental sustainability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, although minimally invasive (including robotic approaches) and endoscopic surgeries offer significant opportunities to improve healthcare we do need to consider the environmental impact. However, there is a paucity of good-quality literature to guide urological surgical practice to reduce the CFP and improve sustainability.</p>","PeriodicalId":21683,"journal":{"name":"Scottish Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scottish Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00369330241280206","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To systematically synthesize existing reported literature calculating the carbon footprint (CFP) of urological surgical practice and identify opportunities for improving the environmental impact of urology surgical practice.

Methods: A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, and PubMed were searched between 1971 and 2023, with inclusion and exclusion criteria. The outcome measures were mapped across the included studies including assessment of risk of bias.

Results: A total of 345 studies with titles were identified from an initial search, however only 5 were included. Three studies compared singleuse with reusable cystoscopes concluded that single-use cystoscopes are non-inferior to reusable cystoscopes environmentally due to the carbon footprint associated with decontamination and repackaging. Similarly, in a single study, the CFP of single-use and reusable ureteroscopes is comparable. Lastly, a single study concluded that robotics-assisted surgery in prostate cancer may be a better option than other approaches in terms of environmental sustainability.

Conclusions: In conclusion, although minimally invasive (including robotic approaches) and endoscopic surgeries offer significant opportunities to improve healthcare we do need to consider the environmental impact. However, there is a paucity of good-quality literature to guide urological surgical practice to reduce the CFP and improve sustainability.

泌尿外科手术实践中的碳足迹和可持续性影响评估--系统回顾。
目的系统综合计算泌尿外科手术实践碳足迹(CFP)的现有文献报道,确定改善泌尿外科手术实践对环境影响的机会:方法: 按照 PRISMA 指南进行系统综述。方法:按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性综述,检索了 1971 年至 2023 年间的 Cochrane、Embase、Ovid MEDLINE 和 PubMed,并制定了纳入和排除标准。对纳入研究的结果指标进行了映射,包括偏倚风险评估:初步检索共发现 345 项有标题的研究,但只有 5 项被纳入。三项研究对一次性膀胱镜和可重复使用膀胱镜进行了比较,结论是一次性膀胱镜在环保方面并不优于可重复使用膀胱镜,因为去污和重新包装会产生碳足迹。同样,在一项研究中,一次性输尿管镜和可重复使用输尿管镜的 CFP 值相当。最后,一项研究认为,就环境可持续性而言,机器人辅助前列腺癌手术可能比其他方法更好:总之,尽管微创(包括机器人方法)和内窥镜手术为改善医疗保健提供了重要机会,但我们确实需要考虑其对环境的影响。然而,目前还缺乏高质量的文献来指导泌尿外科手术实践,以减少CFP并提高可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scottish Medical Journal
Scottish Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
42
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: A unique international information source for the latest news and issues concerning the Scottish medical community. Contributions are drawn from Scotland and its medical institutions, through an array of international authors. In addition to original papers, Scottish Medical Journal publishes commissioned educational review articles, case reports, historical articles, and sponsoring society abstracts.This journal is a member of the Committee on Publications Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信