Optimizing Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein and IgM-Gammopathy Testing for Neuropathy Treatment Evaluation.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000210000
Christopher J Klein, James D Triplett, David L Murray, Amy P Gorsh, Shahar Shelly, Divyanshu Dubey, Marcus V Pinto, Stephen M Ansell, Michael P Skolka, Grace Swart, Michelle L Mauermann, John R Mills
{"title":"Optimizing Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein and IgM-Gammopathy Testing for Neuropathy Treatment Evaluation.","authors":"Christopher J Klein, James D Triplett, David L Murray, Amy P Gorsh, Shahar Shelly, Divyanshu Dubey, Marcus V Pinto, Stephen M Ansell, Michael P Skolka, Grace Swart, Michelle L Mauermann, John R Mills","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Patients with typical anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy have IgM-gammopathy, mimic distal chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and are treatment resistant. Anti-MAG patients go unrecognized when IgM-gammopathy is undetected or with atypical phenotypes. We investigated an optimal anti-MAG titration cutoff for excluding CIDP and the impact of IgM-gammopathy detection on neuropathy treatment evaluation without anti-MAG antibodies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society 2021 guidelines were used to assess patients with neuropathy using anti-MAG Bühlmann titration units (BTU) and IgM-gammopathy with Mass-Fix (mass spectrophotometry) and serum protein immunofixation electrophoresis (SPIEP). The immunotherapy outcome was reviewed by inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) and summated compound muscle action potential (CMAP) nerve conduction changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven hundred and fifty-two patients (average age: 63.8 years, female: 31%) were identified over 30 months: (1) typical anti-MAG neuropathy (n = 104); (2) atypical anti-MAG neuropathy (n = 13); (3) distal or sensory-predominant CIDP (n = 25), including 7 without IgM-gammopathy; (4) typical CIDP (n = 47), including 36 without IgM-gammopathy; (5) axonal IgM-gammopathy-associated neuropathy (n = 104); and (6) IgM-gammopathy-negative, anti-MAG-negative axonal neuropathies (n = 426); and (7) without neuropathy (n = 33) anti-MAG negative. IgM-gammopathy was evaluated by Mass-Fix (n = 493), SPIEP (n = 355), or both (n = 96). Mass-Fix detected 4 additional IgM-gammopathies (3%, 4/117) among patients with anti-MAG antibodies and 7 additional patients (2%, 7/376) without anti-MAG not detected by SPIEP testing. Immunotherapy follow-up was available in 123 (mean: 23 months, range: 3-120 months) including 47 with CIDP (28 without IgM-gammopathy) and 76 non-CIDP (5 without IgM-gammopathy, 45 anti-MAG positive). Treatments included IVIG (n = 89), rituximab (n = 80), and ibrutinib or zanubrutinib (n = 24). An optimal anti-MAG-positive cutoff was identified at ≥1,500 BTU (78% sensitivity, 96% specificity) and at ≥10,000 BTU (74% sensitivity, 100% specificity) for typical anti-MAG neuropathy. Improvements in INCAT scores (<i>p</i> < 0.0001) and summated CMAP (<i>p</i> = 0.0028) were associated with negative anti-MAG (<1,500 BTU, n = 78) and absence of IgM-gammopathy (n = 34). Among 47 patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed CIDP, all anti-MAG negative, the presence of IgM-gammopathy (n = 19) also correlated with a worse treatment response (INCAT scores <i>p</i> = 0.035, summated CMAP <i>p</i> = 0.049).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>A cutoff of 10,000 BTU seems optimal for typical anti-MAG neuropathy while ≥1,500 BTU reduces the likelihood of immune-treatable CIDP. Mass-Fix improves IgM-gammopathy detection in anti-MAG and other IgM-gammopathy neuropathies. Patients with IgM-gammopathy lacking MAG antibodies show reduced treatment response.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"103 11","pages":"e210000"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210000","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Patients with typical anti-myelin-associated glycoprotein (anti-MAG) neuropathy have IgM-gammopathy, mimic distal chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP), and are treatment resistant. Anti-MAG patients go unrecognized when IgM-gammopathy is undetected or with atypical phenotypes. We investigated an optimal anti-MAG titration cutoff for excluding CIDP and the impact of IgM-gammopathy detection on neuropathy treatment evaluation without anti-MAG antibodies.

Methods: European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society 2021 guidelines were used to assess patients with neuropathy using anti-MAG Bühlmann titration units (BTU) and IgM-gammopathy with Mass-Fix (mass spectrophotometry) and serum protein immunofixation electrophoresis (SPIEP). The immunotherapy outcome was reviewed by inflammatory neuropathy cause and treatment (INCAT) and summated compound muscle action potential (CMAP) nerve conduction changes.

Results: Seven hundred and fifty-two patients (average age: 63.8 years, female: 31%) were identified over 30 months: (1) typical anti-MAG neuropathy (n = 104); (2) atypical anti-MAG neuropathy (n = 13); (3) distal or sensory-predominant CIDP (n = 25), including 7 without IgM-gammopathy; (4) typical CIDP (n = 47), including 36 without IgM-gammopathy; (5) axonal IgM-gammopathy-associated neuropathy (n = 104); and (6) IgM-gammopathy-negative, anti-MAG-negative axonal neuropathies (n = 426); and (7) without neuropathy (n = 33) anti-MAG negative. IgM-gammopathy was evaluated by Mass-Fix (n = 493), SPIEP (n = 355), or both (n = 96). Mass-Fix detected 4 additional IgM-gammopathies (3%, 4/117) among patients with anti-MAG antibodies and 7 additional patients (2%, 7/376) without anti-MAG not detected by SPIEP testing. Immunotherapy follow-up was available in 123 (mean: 23 months, range: 3-120 months) including 47 with CIDP (28 without IgM-gammopathy) and 76 non-CIDP (5 without IgM-gammopathy, 45 anti-MAG positive). Treatments included IVIG (n = 89), rituximab (n = 80), and ibrutinib or zanubrutinib (n = 24). An optimal anti-MAG-positive cutoff was identified at ≥1,500 BTU (78% sensitivity, 96% specificity) and at ≥10,000 BTU (74% sensitivity, 100% specificity) for typical anti-MAG neuropathy. Improvements in INCAT scores (p < 0.0001) and summated CMAP (p = 0.0028) were associated with negative anti-MAG (<1,500 BTU, n = 78) and absence of IgM-gammopathy (n = 34). Among 47 patients with electrodiagnostically confirmed CIDP, all anti-MAG negative, the presence of IgM-gammopathy (n = 19) also correlated with a worse treatment response (INCAT scores p = 0.035, summated CMAP p = 0.049).

Discussion: A cutoff of 10,000 BTU seems optimal for typical anti-MAG neuropathy while ≥1,500 BTU reduces the likelihood of immune-treatable CIDP. Mass-Fix improves IgM-gammopathy detection in anti-MAG and other IgM-gammopathy neuropathies. Patients with IgM-gammopathy lacking MAG antibodies show reduced treatment response.

优化神经病变治疗评估中的抗髓鞘相关糖蛋白和 IgM-伽玛病检测。
背景和目的:典型的抗髓鞘相关糖蛋白(anti-MAG)神经病变患者具有 IgM-gammopathy,可模仿远端慢性炎症性脱髓鞘多发性神经病(CIDP),并且具有耐药性。如果未检测到 IgM-淋巴结病或表型不典型,抗 MAG 患者就会被忽视。我们研究了排除 CIDP 的最佳抗 MAG 滴定截止值,以及 IgM-淋巴结病检测对无抗 MAG 抗体的神经病治疗评估的影响:采用欧洲神经病学学会/外周神经学会 2021 年指南,使用抗-MAG 布尔曼滴定单位 (BTU) 和 IgM-丙种球蛋白病的 Mass-Fix(质谱光度法)和血清蛋白免疫固定电泳 (SPIEP) 对神经病变患者进行评估。通过炎症性神经病变的原因和治疗(INCAT)以及复合肌肉动作电位(CMAP)神经传导变化总和对免疫疗法的结果进行审查:结果:752 名患者(平均年龄:63.8 岁,女性:31%):(1)典型抗 MAG 神经病变(104 例);(2)非典型抗 MAG 神经病变(13 例);(3)远端或感觉为主的 CIDP(25 例),其中 7 例无 IgM-消化病;(4)典型 CIDP(47 例),其中 36 例无 IgM-消化病;(5) IgM-gammopathy相关轴索神经病变(n = 104);(6) IgM-gammopathy阴性、抗MAG阴性轴索神经病变(n = 426);(7) 无神经病变(n = 33)抗MAG阴性。通过 Mass-Fix(n = 493)、SPIEP(n = 355)或两者(n = 96)评估 IgM-gammopathy。在有抗 MAG 抗体的患者中,Mass-Fix 又检测出 4 例 IgM-gamm病(3%,4/117),另有 7 例患者(2%,7/376)没有 SPIEP 检测出的抗 MAG。123例(平均:23个月,范围:3-120个月)患者接受了免疫治疗随访,其中包括47例CIDP患者(28例无IgM-gamm病)和76例非CIDP患者(5例无IgM-gamm病,45例抗MAG抗体阳性)。治疗方法包括 IVIG(89 例)、利妥昔单抗(80 例)、伊布替尼或扎鲁替尼(24 例)。抗 MAG 阳性的最佳临界值为≥1,500 BTU(灵敏度为 78%,特异度为 96%),典型抗 MAG 神经病变的临界值为≥10,000 BTU(灵敏度为 74%,特异度为 100%)。INCAT 评分(p < 0.0001)和总和 CMAP(p = 0.0028)的改善与抗 MAG 阴性相关(p = 0.035,总和 CMAP p = 0.049):讨论:10,000 BTU似乎是典型抗MAG神经病变的最佳临界值,而≥1,500 BTU则会降低免疫可治性CIDP的可能性。Mass-Fix能提高抗MAG和其他IgM-gammopathy神经病变的IgM-gammopathy检测能力。缺乏 MAG 抗体的 IgM-gammathy 患者对治疗的反应减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信