Pooled safety analysis from the VOLTAIRE clinical trials of adalimumab-adbm and adalimumab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, and chronic plaque psoriasis.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Stanley Cohen, Shaun Bender, Amy Shaberman, Richard Vinisko, Dottie McCabe
{"title":"Pooled safety analysis from the VOLTAIRE clinical trials of adalimumab-adbm and adalimumab reference product in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease, and chronic plaque psoriasis.","authors":"Stanley Cohen, Shaun Bender, Amy Shaberman, Richard Vinisko, Dottie McCabe","doi":"10.1080/14712598.2024.2426637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This analysis reported the incidence of safety endpoints across five phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease (CD), and chronic plaque psoriasis (PsO) who received ≥ 1 dose of adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product (RP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exposure-adjusted incidence rates for safety endpoints were calculated per 100 patient-years and reported by disease indication and treatment arm. Subgroup analyses by patient age and sex were also conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean length of follow-up was 62 weeks, 48 weeks, and 32 weeks for patients with RA, CD, and PsO, respectively. Rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) and discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) were similar among patients with RA and PsO, but slightly higher among those with CD. Incidence rates of all safety endpoints were consistent between the adalimumab-adbm and adalimumab RP treatment arms within each indication Subgroup analyses of patients with RA, CD, and PsO showed no between-group differences by age and sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with RA, CD, and PsO, there were no differences between biosimilar adalimumab-adbm or the adalimumab RP regarding the rate of AEs, SAEs, discontinuations due to AEs, deaths, or any AEs of special interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":12084,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2024.2426637","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This analysis reported the incidence of safety endpoints across five phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease (CD), and chronic plaque psoriasis (PsO) who received ≥ 1 dose of adalimumab-adbm or adalimumab reference product (RP).

Methods: Exposure-adjusted incidence rates for safety endpoints were calculated per 100 patient-years and reported by disease indication and treatment arm. Subgroup analyses by patient age and sex were also conducted.

Results: The mean length of follow-up was 62 weeks, 48 weeks, and 32 weeks for patients with RA, CD, and PsO, respectively. Rates of serious adverse events (SAEs) and discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) were similar among patients with RA and PsO, but slightly higher among those with CD. Incidence rates of all safety endpoints were consistent between the adalimumab-adbm and adalimumab RP treatment arms within each indication Subgroup analyses of patients with RA, CD, and PsO showed no between-group differences by age and sex.

Conclusions: In patients with RA, CD, and PsO, there were no differences between biosimilar adalimumab-adbm or the adalimumab RP regarding the rate of AEs, SAEs, discontinuations due to AEs, deaths, or any AEs of special interest.

阿达木单抗-adbm和阿达木单抗参比产品在类风湿性关节炎、克罗恩病和慢性斑块型银屑病患者中的VOLTAIRE临床试验汇总安全性分析。
研究目的:本分析报告了在类风湿性关节炎(RA)、克罗恩病(CD)和慢性斑块状银屑病(PsO)患者中进行的五项三期随机对照临床试验的安全性终点发生率,这些患者接受了≥1个剂量的阿达木单抗-adbm或阿达木单抗参比产品(RP)治疗:按疾病适应症和治疗组计算每100个患者年的暴露调整后安全终点发病率。结果:平均随访时间为62周:RA、CD和PsO患者的平均随访时间分别为62周、48周和32周。RA和PsO患者的SAE和因AE而停药的比例相似,但CD患者的SAE和因AE而停药的比例略高。在每个适应症中,阿达木单抗-adbm和阿达木单抗RP治疗组的所有安全性终点发生率一致。 对RA、CD和PsO患者进行的亚组分析显示,不同年龄和性别的患者在组间没有差异:在RA、CD和PsO患者中,生物仿制药阿达木单抗-adbm和阿达木单抗RP在不良事件发生率、严重不良事件、不良事件导致的停药、死亡或任何特别关注的不良事件方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 医学-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
96
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (1471-2598; 1744-7682) is a MEDLINE-indexed, international journal publishing peer-reviewed research across all aspects of biological therapy. Each article is structured to incorporate the author’s own expert opinion on the impact of the topic on research and clinical practice and the scope for future development. The audience consists of scientists and managers in the healthcare and biopharmaceutical industries and others closely involved in the development and application of biological therapies for the treatment of human disease. The journal welcomes: Reviews covering therapeutic antibodies and vaccines, peptides and proteins, gene therapies and gene transfer technologies, cell-based therapies and regenerative medicine Drug evaluations reviewing the clinical data on a particular biological agent Original research papers reporting the results of clinical investigations on biological agents and biotherapeutic-based studies with a strong link to clinical practice Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Collection format and includes the following sections: Expert Opinion – a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results; Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信