Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: the RESONANCE Spanish registry.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/europace/euae277
Francisco Ruiz Mateas, Marcos Antonio Pérez, Fernando García López, Susana González, Ignasi Anguera Camós, Gabriel Gusi Tragant, María Robledo Irrañitu, Ignacio Fernández Lozano, Juan Gabriel Martínez, Francisco Javier Alzueta Rodríguez
{"title":"Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: the RESONANCE Spanish registry.","authors":"Francisco Ruiz Mateas, Marcos Antonio Pérez, Fernando García López, Susana González, Ignasi Anguera Camós, Gabriel Gusi Tragant, María Robledo Irrañitu, Ignacio Fernández Lozano, Juan Gabriel Martínez, Francisco Javier Alzueta Rodríguez","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Despite increasing evidence demonstrating the safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), this procedure is often neglected in this population. This Spanish registry aimed to determine the proportion of MRI referrals and performance among patients with pacemakers (PMs) or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This prospective, multicentre, open-label registry involved 21 Spanish centres. Data were collected upon implant of PMs or ICDs from BIOTRONIK and one year after, and included the number of MRIs and computed tomography scans prescribed, performed and denied, and reasons for denial. Data from 1105 patients (mean age: 74.2 years) were analysed and 982 completed the follow-up. Of them, 82.2% had a PM and 17.8% an ICD. A total of 351 imaging tests were prescribed in 220 patients (19.9%), including 52 MRIs in 39 patients (3.5%) and 299 computed tomography scans in 196 patients (17.8%). Among the MRIs, 44 (84.6%) were performed, five (9.6%) were not performed, and three (5.8%) were replaced by an alternative test. Most of the indicated computed tomography scans were performed (97.7%). The proportion of patients with an MRI scan referral was 4.6% during the pre-COVID-19 period and 2.6% during the COVID-19 period. No MRI-related arrhythmic ventricular event was reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This registry revealed that only 3.5% of patients with CIEDs had an MRI referral over the study, with rates decreasing to 2.6% during the COVID-19 period. These rates contrast with the 85 MRIs conducted per 1000 inhabitants in Spain in 2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11572718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae277","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Despite increasing evidence demonstrating the safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), this procedure is often neglected in this population. This Spanish registry aimed to determine the proportion of MRI referrals and performance among patients with pacemakers (PMs) or implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs).

Methods and results: This prospective, multicentre, open-label registry involved 21 Spanish centres. Data were collected upon implant of PMs or ICDs from BIOTRONIK and one year after, and included the number of MRIs and computed tomography scans prescribed, performed and denied, and reasons for denial. Data from 1105 patients (mean age: 74.2 years) were analysed and 982 completed the follow-up. Of them, 82.2% had a PM and 17.8% an ICD. A total of 351 imaging tests were prescribed in 220 patients (19.9%), including 52 MRIs in 39 patients (3.5%) and 299 computed tomography scans in 196 patients (17.8%). Among the MRIs, 44 (84.6%) were performed, five (9.6%) were not performed, and three (5.8%) were replaced by an alternative test. Most of the indicated computed tomography scans were performed (97.7%). The proportion of patients with an MRI scan referral was 4.6% during the pre-COVID-19 period and 2.6% during the COVID-19 period. No MRI-related arrhythmic ventricular event was reported.

Conclusion: This registry revealed that only 3.5% of patients with CIEDs had an MRI referral over the study, with rates decreasing to 2.6% during the COVID-19 period. These rates contrast with the 85 MRIs conducted per 1000 inhabitants in Spain in 2020.

心脏植入式电子设备患者的磁共振成像:RESONANCE 西班牙登记。
背景和目的:尽管越来越多的证据表明磁共振成像(MRI)对心脏植入式电子装置(CIED)患者具有安全性,但这一程序在这一人群中往往被忽视。这项西班牙登记旨在确定心脏起搏器(PM)或植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)患者的磁共振成像转诊比例和效果:这项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签登记涉及 21 个西班牙中心。数据收集于植入 BIOTRONIK 的 PM 或 ICD 后一年,包括核磁共振成像和计算机断层扫描的处方数、执行数和拒绝数,以及拒绝的原因:对 1105 名患者(平均年龄 74.2 岁)的数据进行了分析,其中 982 人完成了随访。其中,82.2%的患者有 PM,17.8%的患者有 ICD。220 名患者(19.9%)共接受了 351 次成像检查,包括 39 名患者(3.5%)的 52 次核磁共振成像检查和 196 名患者(17.8%)的 299 次计算机断层扫描检查。在核磁共振成像检查中,44 例(84.6%)进行了检查,5 例(9.6%)未进行检查,3 例(5.8%)被其他检查替代。大多数指定的计算机断层扫描都进行了(97.7%)。在 COVID-19 之前和期间,转诊进行 MRI 扫描的患者比例分别为 4.6% 和 2.6%。没有磁共振成像相关心律失常室性事件的报告:该登记显示,在研究期间,仅有 3.5% 的 CIED 患者接受了磁共振成像转诊,在 COVID-19 期间,这一比例降至 2.6%。这些比率与 2020 年西班牙每 1000 名居民中进行 85 次核磁共振成像形成鲜明对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信