Long-term reductions in acute headache medication use after eptinezumab treatment in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures: Post hoc analysis of the DELIVER randomized trial.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1111/head.14862
Anna Gryglas-Dworak, Jack Schim, Anders Ettrup, Line Pickering Boserup, Mette Krog Josiassen, Kristina Ranc, Bjørn Sperling, Messoud Ashina
{"title":"Long-term reductions in acute headache medication use after eptinezumab treatment in patients with migraine and prior preventive treatment failures: Post hoc analysis of the DELIVER randomized trial.","authors":"Anna Gryglas-Dworak, Jack Schim, Anders Ettrup, Line Pickering Boserup, Mette Krog Josiassen, Kristina Ranc, Bjørn Sperling, Messoud Ashina","doi":"10.1111/head.14862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate long-term reductions in acute headache medication (AHM) use with eptinezumab versus placebo in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures and medication overuse (MO).</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Preventive migraine treatment is recommended for patients for whom AHMs have failed and for those who are using excessive amounts of AHM. MO may worsen headache and migraine symptoms in people with migraine; it is a risk factor for disease chronification and/or MO headache.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>DELIVER was a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3b clinical trial that randomized adults with migraine and two to four prior preventive failures to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo infusion every 12 weeks; patients initially given placebo received eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg in the extension period. MO was defined according to diagnostic criteria for MO headache in the baseline diary reports. This post hoc analysis of the DELIVER study included change from baseline in AHM days/month of use (ergotamines, triptans, simple or combination analgesics, and opioids; total and select class-specific use) in the MO population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 890 patients were included in the total population, and 438/890 (49.2%) had MO at baseline. In both the total population and MO population, eptinezumab resulted in greater reductions in total AHM days/month of use during weeks 1-24 than placebo, with triptans showing the largest reduction among AHM classes. Patients switching from placebo to eptinezumab experienced reductions in AHM days/month similar to that of initial eptinezumab treatment. In the extension population, mean (standard error [SE]) changes from baseline in AHM days/month were -4.6 (0.32; 100 mg) and -4.8 (0.32; 300 mg) across weeks 1-4 in patients who received eptinezumab for the entire treatment period and were -4.8 (0.44; placebo-100 mg) and -5.5 (0.44; placebo-300 mg) across weeks 25-28 in patients who switched from placebo to eptinezumab. Mean (SE) changes from baseline in AHM days/month in the extension MO population were -6.5 (0.59; 100 mg) and -6.6 (0.57; 300 mg) across weeks 1-4 in patients who received eptinezumab for the entire treatment period and were -7.1 (0.81; 100 mg) and -8.0 (0.80; 300 mg) across weeks 25-28 in patients who were switched from placebo to eptinezumab. All treatment arms sustained or further reduced AHM use across 18 months of trial participation. Across weeks 1-4, in patients fulfilling criteria for MO at baseline, 68.0% (102/150) of patients treated with eptinezumab 100 mg and 74.7% (109/146) of patients treated with eptinezumab 300 mg reported AHM use below MO thresholds compared to 43.3% (61/141) of patients receiving placebo. In patients with MO at baseline, the proportion of patients without MO remained above 60.0% for all treatment groups during the extension period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Eptinezumab reduced total AHM use more than placebo in patients with prior preventive failures and in patients with MO at baseline; largest reductions were observed for triptans. Robust reductions in AHM use after eptinezumab were sustained or further reduced with up to 18 months of treatment, and most patients no longer met thresholds for MO.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.14862","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate long-term reductions in acute headache medication (AHM) use with eptinezumab versus placebo in patients with prior preventive migraine treatment failures and medication overuse (MO).

Background: Preventive migraine treatment is recommended for patients for whom AHMs have failed and for those who are using excessive amounts of AHM. MO may worsen headache and migraine symptoms in people with migraine; it is a risk factor for disease chronification and/or MO headache.

Methods: DELIVER was a multicenter, parallel-group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3b clinical trial that randomized adults with migraine and two to four prior preventive failures to eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo infusion every 12 weeks; patients initially given placebo received eptinezumab 100 mg or 300 mg in the extension period. MO was defined according to diagnostic criteria for MO headache in the baseline diary reports. This post hoc analysis of the DELIVER study included change from baseline in AHM days/month of use (ergotamines, triptans, simple or combination analgesics, and opioids; total and select class-specific use) in the MO population.

Results: A total of 890 patients were included in the total population, and 438/890 (49.2%) had MO at baseline. In both the total population and MO population, eptinezumab resulted in greater reductions in total AHM days/month of use during weeks 1-24 than placebo, with triptans showing the largest reduction among AHM classes. Patients switching from placebo to eptinezumab experienced reductions in AHM days/month similar to that of initial eptinezumab treatment. In the extension population, mean (standard error [SE]) changes from baseline in AHM days/month were -4.6 (0.32; 100 mg) and -4.8 (0.32; 300 mg) across weeks 1-4 in patients who received eptinezumab for the entire treatment period and were -4.8 (0.44; placebo-100 mg) and -5.5 (0.44; placebo-300 mg) across weeks 25-28 in patients who switched from placebo to eptinezumab. Mean (SE) changes from baseline in AHM days/month in the extension MO population were -6.5 (0.59; 100 mg) and -6.6 (0.57; 300 mg) across weeks 1-4 in patients who received eptinezumab for the entire treatment period and were -7.1 (0.81; 100 mg) and -8.0 (0.80; 300 mg) across weeks 25-28 in patients who were switched from placebo to eptinezumab. All treatment arms sustained or further reduced AHM use across 18 months of trial participation. Across weeks 1-4, in patients fulfilling criteria for MO at baseline, 68.0% (102/150) of patients treated with eptinezumab 100 mg and 74.7% (109/146) of patients treated with eptinezumab 300 mg reported AHM use below MO thresholds compared to 43.3% (61/141) of patients receiving placebo. In patients with MO at baseline, the proportion of patients without MO remained above 60.0% for all treatment groups during the extension period.

Conclusions: Eptinezumab reduced total AHM use more than placebo in patients with prior preventive failures and in patients with MO at baseline; largest reductions were observed for triptans. Robust reductions in AHM use after eptinezumab were sustained or further reduced with up to 18 months of treatment, and most patients no longer met thresholds for MO.

偏头痛患者接受eptinezumab治疗后急性头痛用药量的长期减少以及之前预防性治疗的失败:DELIVER随机试验的事后分析。
目的评估eptinezumab与安慰剂相比,对既往偏头痛预防治疗失败和药物过度使用(MO)患者长期减少急性头痛药物(AHM)使用的效果:背景:建议对AHM治疗失败的患者和过度使用AHM的患者进行偏头痛预防治疗。MO可能会加重偏头痛患者的头痛和偏头痛症状;它是疾病慢性化和/或MO头痛的危险因素:DELIVER是一项多中心、平行组、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的3b期临床试验,该试验将患有偏头痛且之前有2到4次预防失败的成人患者随机分组,每12周输注一次eptinezumab 100毫克、300毫克或安慰剂;最初输注安慰剂的患者在延长期输注eptinezumab 100毫克或300毫克。MO是根据基线日记报告中的MO头痛诊断标准定义的。这项DELIVER研究的事后分析包括MO人群中AHM使用天数/月(麦角胺类药物、曲普坦类药物、单纯或复合镇痛药和阿片类药物;总使用量和特定类别使用量)与基线相比的变化:共有 890 名患者被纳入总人群,其中 438/890 人(49.2%)在基线时患有 MO。在总人群和MO人群中,与安慰剂相比,在第1-24周期间,依替珠单抗可使AHM总使用天数/月减少更多,在AHM类别中,三苯氧胺的减少幅度最大。从安慰剂转用依替尼珠单抗的患者,其AHM天/月减少量与最初接受依替尼珠单抗治疗的患者相似。在推广人群中,在整个治疗期间接受eptinezumab治疗的患者在第1-4周的AHM天/月平均值(标准误差[SE])与基线相比的变化分别为-4.6(0.32;100毫克)和-4.8(0.32;300毫克),而从安慰剂转为eptinezumab治疗的患者在第25-28周的AHM天/月平均值(标准误差[SE])与基线相比的变化分别为-4.8(0.44;安慰剂-100毫克)和-5.5(0.44;安慰剂-300毫克)。在整个治疗期间接受eptinezumab治疗的患者在第1-4周的AHM天/月与基线相比的平均(SE)变化为-6.5(0.59;100 mg)和-6.6(0.57;300 mg);在第25-28周,从安慰剂转为eptinezumab治疗的患者的AHM天/月与基线相比的平均(SE)变化为-7.1(0.81;100 mg)和-8.0(0.80;300 mg)。在参与试验的18个月中,所有治疗组均维持或进一步减少了AHM的使用。在第1-4周,基线时符合MO标准的患者中,68.0%(102/150)接受eptinezumab 100 mg治疗的患者和74.7%(109/146)接受eptinezumab 300 mg治疗的患者报告AHM使用量低于MO阈值,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者报告AHM使用量低于MO阈值的比例为43.3%(61/141)。在基线有MO的患者中,所有治疗组在延长期内无MO的患者比例均保持在60.0%以上:结论:与安慰剂相比,厄普汀珠单抗能更有效地减少既往预防失败患者和基线有MO的患者的AHM总用量;其中三苯氧胺的用量减少最多。在接受长达 18 个月的治疗后,eptinezumab 可持续或进一步减少 AHM 的使用,大多数患者不再达到 MO 的阈值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信