Most AOTL type A and type B thoracolumbar primary fracture line follow the mechanism of an imaging-based injury model.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Guoping Cai, Bingshan Yan
{"title":"Most AOTL type A and type B thoracolumbar primary fracture line follow the mechanism of an imaging-based injury model.","authors":"Guoping Cai, Bingshan Yan","doi":"10.1007/s00586-024-08552-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Based on the phenomenon that most thoracolumbar primary fracture line passes the center of the pedicle, we proposed an injury mechanism model to evaluate.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients with thoracolumbar fractures treated operatively between October 2019, and December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic and spinal radiographical parameters were measured and recorded. Pedicle hyperintensity on T2-weighted sagittal MR images was labeled. We examined the relationship between the course of the line (Radius) connecting the center of the pedicle of the injured vertebra and the IAR and orientation of the thoracolumbar primary fracture line. A partial correlation test was calculated to find correlations between demographic and spinal radiographical parameters. Nonlinear regression analysis was run with the Radius as the dependent variable and the other spinal kyphosis parameters as the independent variables to verify this model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety-seven patients with 104 thoracolumbar fractures were included in this study. Ninety-four (90.4%) thoracolumbar fractures showed a high signal on MRI T2 through the pedicle. Involvement of the center of the pedicle was distributed among most AOTL Type A and Type B thoracolumbar fractures. In total, 92.3% of primary vertebral fracture lines followed the Radius of the model (r2 = 0.940).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We provide a simple and quantifiable spinal instantaneous injury mechanism model for thoracolumbar fractures. Specifically, most AOTL type A and B thoracolumbar primary fracture line conforms to this model.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08552-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Based on the phenomenon that most thoracolumbar primary fracture line passes the center of the pedicle, we proposed an injury mechanism model to evaluate.

Methods: Consecutive patients with thoracolumbar fractures treated operatively between October 2019, and December 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic and spinal radiographical parameters were measured and recorded. Pedicle hyperintensity on T2-weighted sagittal MR images was labeled. We examined the relationship between the course of the line (Radius) connecting the center of the pedicle of the injured vertebra and the IAR and orientation of the thoracolumbar primary fracture line. A partial correlation test was calculated to find correlations between demographic and spinal radiographical parameters. Nonlinear regression analysis was run with the Radius as the dependent variable and the other spinal kyphosis parameters as the independent variables to verify this model.

Results: Ninety-seven patients with 104 thoracolumbar fractures were included in this study. Ninety-four (90.4%) thoracolumbar fractures showed a high signal on MRI T2 through the pedicle. Involvement of the center of the pedicle was distributed among most AOTL Type A and Type B thoracolumbar fractures. In total, 92.3% of primary vertebral fracture lines followed the Radius of the model (r2 = 0.940).

Conclusions: We provide a simple and quantifiable spinal instantaneous injury mechanism model for thoracolumbar fractures. Specifically, most AOTL type A and B thoracolumbar primary fracture line conforms to this model.

大多数 AOTL A 型和 B 型胸腰椎原发性骨折线都遵循基于成像的损伤模型机制。
背景:根据大多数胸腰椎原发骨折线经过椎弓根中心的现象,我们提出了一种损伤机制模型来进行评估:回顾性分析 2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 12 月间接受手术治疗的连续胸腰椎骨折患者。测量并记录人口统计学和脊柱放射学参数。标记了T2加权矢状磁共振图像上的椎弓根高密度。我们研究了损伤椎体椎弓根中心与IAR连接线(半径)的走向与胸腰椎原发骨折线走向之间的关系。计算偏相关检验以发现人口统计学和脊柱放射学参数之间的相关性。以桡骨为因变量,其他脊柱后凸参数为自变量,进行了非线性回归分析,以验证该模型:本研究共纳入了 97 名胸腰段骨折患者,共 104 例。94例(90.4%)胸腰椎骨折在核磁共振T2上显示出穿过椎弓根的高信号。大多数 AOTL A 型和 B 型胸腰椎骨折都累及椎弓根中心。总之,92.3%的原发性脊椎骨折线遵循模型的半径(r2 = 0.940):我们为胸腰椎骨折提供了一个简单且可量化的脊柱瞬时损伤机制模型。具体而言,大多数 AOTL A 型和 B 型胸腰椎原发性骨折线符合该模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信