Outcomes of elective open surgical repair or fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in Sweden.

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Harry H Y Yu, Giuseppe Asciutto, Nuno Dias, Anders Wanhainen, Angelos Karelis, Björn Sonesson, Kevin Mani
{"title":"Outcomes of elective open surgical repair or fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in Sweden.","authors":"Harry H Y Yu, Giuseppe Asciutto, Nuno Dias, Anders Wanhainen, Angelos Karelis, Björn Sonesson, Kevin Mani","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znae279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm is defined as a short (less than 4 mm) or no-neck aneurysm, which is often treated with open or complex endovascular repair. The evidence to support the best treatment strategy is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the short- and mid-term outcomes of elective open surgical repair or fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in Sweden.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent elective open surgical repair or fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms between 2018 and 2021 were identified in the Swedish Vascular Registry. Demographics, practice patterns, and operative details were assessed. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and mid-term survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3777 aortic aneurysm repairs performed, 418 involved juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (open surgical repair 228 (54.5%), fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair 176 (42.1%), chimney endovascular aneurysm repair 6 (1.4%), and branched endovascular aneurysm repair 8 (1.9%)). Some 25 centres performed juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs with open surgical repair and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. The caseload varied from 2 to 54 repairs per centre. The mean aneurysm diameter was 61 mm. Endovascularly treated patients were older and had more pulmonary co-morbidities. The 30-day mortality rate was 2.2% (open surgical repair 2.6% and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair 1.7%; P = 0.397). Perioperative major complications occurred in 14.1% of patients (open surgical repair 19.3% and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair 7.4%; P < 0.001) and perioperative vascular complications occurred in 12.1% of patients (open surgical repair 8.8% and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair 11.9%; P = 0.190). The survival rate (estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis) at 1 year and 3 years was 93.1% and 85.9% respectively for open surgical repair and 95.2% and 80.9% respectively for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (P = 0.477).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This nationwide study reveals considerable variations in volume and treatment strategy between Swedish centres performing juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. Survival is comparable for open surgical repair and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair, although there are significant baseline demographic differences between patients selected for the two treatment modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"111 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11538729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae279","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm is defined as a short (less than 4 mm) or no-neck aneurysm, which is often treated with open or complex endovascular repair. The evidence to support the best treatment strategy is scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the short- and mid-term outcomes of elective open surgical repair or fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms in Sweden.

Methods: Patients who underwent elective open surgical repair or fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair for juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms between 2018 and 2021 were identified in the Swedish Vascular Registry. Demographics, practice patterns, and operative details were assessed. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and mid-term survival.

Results: Among 3777 aortic aneurysm repairs performed, 418 involved juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (open surgical repair 228 (54.5%), fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair 176 (42.1%), chimney endovascular aneurysm repair 6 (1.4%), and branched endovascular aneurysm repair 8 (1.9%)). Some 25 centres performed juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs with open surgical repair and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair. The caseload varied from 2 to 54 repairs per centre. The mean aneurysm diameter was 61 mm. Endovascularly treated patients were older and had more pulmonary co-morbidities. The 30-day mortality rate was 2.2% (open surgical repair 2.6% and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair 1.7%; P = 0.397). Perioperative major complications occurred in 14.1% of patients (open surgical repair 19.3% and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair 7.4%; P < 0.001) and perioperative vascular complications occurred in 12.1% of patients (open surgical repair 8.8% and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair 11.9%; P = 0.190). The survival rate (estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis) at 1 year and 3 years was 93.1% and 85.9% respectively for open surgical repair and 95.2% and 80.9% respectively for fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (P = 0.477).

Conclusion: This nationwide study reveals considerable variations in volume and treatment strategy between Swedish centres performing juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs. Survival is comparable for open surgical repair and fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair, although there are significant baseline demographic differences between patients selected for the two treatment modalities.

瑞典腹主动脉瘤选择性开放手术修补或腔内血管动脉瘤修补术的疗效。
背景:并arenal 腹主动脉瘤被定义为短动脉瘤(小于 4 毫米)或无颈动脉瘤,通常采用开放式或复杂的血管内修复术进行治疗。支持最佳治疗策略的证据还很少。本研究的目的是评估瑞典选择性开放手术修复或栅栏式血管内动脉瘤修复术治疗并arenal腹主动脉瘤的短期和中期疗效:瑞典血管注册中心对2018年至2021年期间接受选择性开放手术修复或腔内血管动脉瘤修复术治疗并arenal腹主动脉瘤的患者进行了鉴定。对人口统计学、实践模式和手术细节进行了评估。主要结果是 30 天死亡率。次要结果包括围手术期并发症和中期存活率:在进行的 3777 例主动脉瘤修补术中,418 例涉及并arenal 腹主动脉瘤(开放手术修补 228 例(54.5%)、栅栏状血管内动脉瘤修补 176 例(42.1%)、烟囱状血管内动脉瘤修补 6 例(1.4%)和分支状血管内动脉瘤修补 8 例(1.9%))。约有 25 家中心通过开放式手术修复和栅栏式血管内动脉瘤修复术进行了并心腹主动脉瘤修复。每个中心的手术量从 2 例到 54 例不等。动脉瘤的平均直径为 61 毫米。接受血管内治疗的患者年龄较大,合并肺部疾病较多。30天死亡率为2.2%(开放手术修复为2.6%,穿孔血管内动脉瘤修复为1.7%;P = 0.397)。围手术期主要并发症发生率为 14.1%(开放式手术修复为 19.3%,栅栏式血管内动脉瘤修复为 7.4%;P < 0.001),围手术期血管并发症发生率为 12.1%(开放式手术修复为 8.8%,栅栏式血管内动脉瘤修复为 11.9%;P = 0.190)。采用卡普兰-梅耶尔分析法估算的1年和3年存活率分别为:开放手术修复术93.1%和85.9%,开窗血管内动脉瘤修复术95.2%和80.9%(P = 0.477):这项全国性研究显示,瑞典各中心在进行并arenal腹主动脉瘤修补术时,在手术量和治疗策略上存在很大差异。尽管两种治疗方式所选患者的基线人口统计学差异显著,但开放手术修复术和瓣膜内血管动脉瘤修复术的存活率相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信