'Shades of grey': a focus group study on diagnostic uncertainty among general practitioners using point-of-care ultrasound.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Hans-Christian Myklestul, Holgeir Skjeie, Mette Brekke, Trygve Skonnord
{"title":"'Shades of grey': a focus group study on diagnostic uncertainty among general practitioners using point-of-care ultrasound.","authors":"Hans-Christian Myklestul, Holgeir Skjeie, Mette Brekke, Trygve Skonnord","doi":"10.1080/02813432.2024.2423242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has long been a diagnostic tool in family medicine, although most Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) who use POCUS, scans infrequently. The broad scope of family medicine, the relatively low prevalence of illnesses and infrequent use of POCUS imply that GPs may experience diagnostic uncertainty regularly.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore how GPs perceived and managed diagnostic uncertainty when using POCUS.</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>A qualitative focus group study among Norwegian GPs using POCUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four focus group discussions were conducted. Total number of participants were 21. The interview guide was piloted, the focus group discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed, and Systematic Text Condensation, a thematic cross-case analysis, was used to analyse the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Diagnostic uncertainty using POCUS was considered as aligning to the general clinical uncertainties in family medicine, but there were also POCUS-specific uncertainties in clinical decision-making. We generated six themes: emotional, cognitive, and ethical uncertainty using POCUS, communicating uncertainty to patients, interaction with specialists when using POCUS, and coping strategies of participants. POCUS results were the only results the participants sometimes withheld when communicating with other specialists. POCUS itself stimulated a renewed interest in family medicine. Scanning enough patients was the recommended coping strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS-using GPs experienced diagnostic uncertainty when using POCUS that aligned with other diagnostic uncertainties they experienced in everyday practice. However, they did not treat the results like other findings, as the GPs at times withheld their POCUS findings when interacting with secondary care specialists. This requires further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21521,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"219-229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11834800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2024.2423242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) has long been a diagnostic tool in family medicine, although most Norwegian general practitioners (GPs) who use POCUS, scans infrequently. The broad scope of family medicine, the relatively low prevalence of illnesses and infrequent use of POCUS imply that GPs may experience diagnostic uncertainty regularly.

Aim: To explore how GPs perceived and managed diagnostic uncertainty when using POCUS.

Design and setting: A qualitative focus group study among Norwegian GPs using POCUS.

Methods: Four focus group discussions were conducted. Total number of participants were 21. The interview guide was piloted, the focus group discussions were audio-recorded and transcribed, and Systematic Text Condensation, a thematic cross-case analysis, was used to analyse the data.

Results: Diagnostic uncertainty using POCUS was considered as aligning to the general clinical uncertainties in family medicine, but there were also POCUS-specific uncertainties in clinical decision-making. We generated six themes: emotional, cognitive, and ethical uncertainty using POCUS, communicating uncertainty to patients, interaction with specialists when using POCUS, and coping strategies of participants. POCUS results were the only results the participants sometimes withheld when communicating with other specialists. POCUS itself stimulated a renewed interest in family medicine. Scanning enough patients was the recommended coping strategy.

Conclusion: POCUS-using GPs experienced diagnostic uncertainty when using POCUS that aligned with other diagnostic uncertainties they experienced in everyday practice. However, they did not treat the results like other findings, as the GPs at times withheld their POCUS findings when interacting with secondary care specialists. This requires further investigation.

灰色阴影":关于全科医生使用护理点超声波诊断不确定性的焦点小组研究。
背景:护理点超声波检查(POCUS)长期以来一直是全科医学的诊断工具,但大多数挪威全科医生(GPs)并不经常使用POCUS扫描。全科医学的范围很广,疾病的发病率相对较低,而且不经常使用POCUS,这意味着全科医生可能会经常遇到诊断上的不确定性。目的:探讨全科医生在使用POCUS时如何看待和处理诊断上的不确定性:设计与环境:对使用 POCUS 的挪威全科医生进行焦点小组定性研究:进行了四次焦点小组讨论。参与者总数为 21 人。对访谈指南进行了试用,对焦点小组讨论进行了录音和誊写,并使用系统文本浓缩(一种专题交叉分析法)对数据进行了分析:结果:使用 POCUS 诊断的不确定性被认为与全科医学的一般临床不确定性一致,但在临床决策中也存在 POCUS 特有的不确定性。我们提出了六个主题:使用 POCUS 时的情感、认知和伦理不确定性,向患者传达不确定性,使用 POCUS 时与专家的互动,以及参与者的应对策略。在与其他专家交流时,参与者有时会隐瞒 POCUS 结果。POCUS 本身激发了人们对家庭医学的新兴趣。建议的应对策略是扫描足够多的患者:使用 POCUS 的全科医生在使用 POCUS 时会遇到诊断不确定性,这与他们在日常工作中遇到的其他诊断不确定性一致。然而,他们并没有像对待其他诊断结果一样对待这些结果,因为全科医生在与二级医疗专家交流时有时会隐瞒他们的 POCUS 诊断结果。这需要进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
19.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is an international online open access journal publishing articles with relevance to general practice and primary health care. Focusing on the continuous professional development in family medicine the journal addresses clinical, epidemiological and humanistic topics in relation to the daily clinical practice. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care is owned by the members of the National Colleges of General Practice in the five Nordic countries through the Nordic Federation of General Practice (NFGP). The journal includes original research on topics related to general practice and family medicine, and publishes both quantitative and qualitative original research, editorials, discussion and analysis papers and reviews to facilitate continuing professional development in family medicine. The journal''s topics range broadly and include: • Clinical family medicine • Epidemiological research • Qualitative research • Health services research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信