LSTM + Transformer Real-Time Crash Risk Evaluation Using Traffic Flow and Risky Driving Behavior Data

IF 8.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Lei Han;Mohamed Abdel-Aty;Rongjie Yu;Chenzhu Wang
{"title":"LSTM + Transformer Real-Time Crash Risk Evaluation Using Traffic Flow and Risky Driving Behavior Data","authors":"Lei Han;Mohamed Abdel-Aty;Rongjie Yu;Chenzhu Wang","doi":"10.1109/TITS.2024.3438616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crash risk evaluation studies mainly established the relationship between the macro traffic status and crashes. However, the impact of risky driving behavior, a significant factor in crashes, has not been thoroughly investigated due to the data collection limitations of fixed detectors. In this study, the risky driving behavior data generated by Connected Vehicle (CV) techniques was introduced along with traffic flow data to develop the crash risk evaluation model. An LSTM + Transformer approach was developed, in which the Transformer could extract the non-aggregated spatial-temporal features of risky driving behaviors and LSTM learn the temporal patterns of traffic flow. An ensemble layer was proposed to integrate the macro traffic status features and micro driving behavior, and automatically fit their weights to optimize crash risk evaluation performance. Data from a Chinese freeway was used for empirical analysis. The results show that the proposed LSTM + Transformer model achieved high model accuracy (77.7%), recall (68.6%), and AUC (0.785), with average improvement of between 5.34%, 15.69%, and 5.97%, respectively, compared to existing LSTM, XGBoost, SVM and Logistic Regression (LR) models. Moreover, utilizing risky driving behavior data by incorporating the macro traffic status has proved to capture the pre-crash traffic flow turbulence more precisely. The model results explained by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) reveal that higher frequency, longer duration and greater acceleration of risky braking behavior increase the number of road vehicles affected, thereby heightening the crash risks. These findings could help the deployment of proactive traffic management and target CV control strategies to reduce crashes.","PeriodicalId":13416,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems","volume":"25 11","pages":"18383-18395"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10633785/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crash risk evaluation studies mainly established the relationship between the macro traffic status and crashes. However, the impact of risky driving behavior, a significant factor in crashes, has not been thoroughly investigated due to the data collection limitations of fixed detectors. In this study, the risky driving behavior data generated by Connected Vehicle (CV) techniques was introduced along with traffic flow data to develop the crash risk evaluation model. An LSTM + Transformer approach was developed, in which the Transformer could extract the non-aggregated spatial-temporal features of risky driving behaviors and LSTM learn the temporal patterns of traffic flow. An ensemble layer was proposed to integrate the macro traffic status features and micro driving behavior, and automatically fit their weights to optimize crash risk evaluation performance. Data from a Chinese freeway was used for empirical analysis. The results show that the proposed LSTM + Transformer model achieved high model accuracy (77.7%), recall (68.6%), and AUC (0.785), with average improvement of between 5.34%, 15.69%, and 5.97%, respectively, compared to existing LSTM, XGBoost, SVM and Logistic Regression (LR) models. Moreover, utilizing risky driving behavior data by incorporating the macro traffic status has proved to capture the pre-crash traffic flow turbulence more precisely. The model results explained by SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) reveal that higher frequency, longer duration and greater acceleration of risky braking behavior increase the number of road vehicles affected, thereby heightening the crash risks. These findings could help the deployment of proactive traffic management and target CV control strategies to reduce crashes.
利用交通流量和危险驾驶行为数据进行 LSTM + 变压器实时碰撞风险评估
碰撞风险评估研究主要确定了宏观交通状况与碰撞事故之间的关系。然而,由于固定检测器数据收集的局限性,作为碰撞事故重要因素的危险驾驶行为的影响尚未得到深入研究。在本研究中,由车联网(CV)技术生成的危险驾驶行为数据与交通流数据一起被引入到碰撞风险评估模型的开发中。研究开发了一种 LSTM + Transformer 方法,其中 Transformer 可以提取风险驾驶行为的非聚合时空特征,而 LSTM 可以学习交通流的时间模式。研究还提出了一个集合层来整合宏观交通状况特征和微观驾驶行为,并自动拟合它们的权重,以优化碰撞风险评估性能。实证分析使用了中国高速公路的数据。结果表明,与现有的 LSTM、XGBoost、SVM 和逻辑回归(LR)模型相比,所提出的 LSTM + Transformer 模型实现了较高的模型准确率(77.7%)、召回率(68.6%)和 AUC(0.785),平均改进幅度分别为 5.34%、15.69% 和 5.97%。此外,通过结合宏观交通状况来利用危险驾驶行为数据,已被证明能更精确地捕捉到碰撞前的交通流动荡。用 SHapley Additive exPlanations(SHAP)解释的模型结果显示,风险制动行为的频率越高、持续时间越长、加速度越大,受影响的道路车辆数量就越多,从而增加了碰撞风险。这些发现有助于部署积极主动的交通管理和有针对性的车辆控制策略,以减少碰撞事故。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems
IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
14.80
自引率
12.90%
发文量
1872
审稿时长
7.5 months
期刊介绍: The theoretical, experimental and operational aspects of electrical and electronics engineering and information technologies as applied to Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Intelligent Transportation Systems are defined as those systems utilizing synergistic technologies and systems engineering concepts to develop and improve transportation systems of all kinds. The scope of this interdisciplinary activity includes the promotion, consolidation and coordination of ITS technical activities among IEEE entities, and providing a focus for cooperative activities, both internally and externally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信