The role of image realism and expectation in illusory self-motion (vection) perception in younger and older adults

IF 3.7 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Brandy Murovec , Julia Spaniol , Behrang Keshavarz
{"title":"The role of image realism and expectation in illusory self-motion (vection) perception in younger and older adults","authors":"Brandy Murovec ,&nbsp;Julia Spaniol ,&nbsp;Behrang Keshavarz","doi":"10.1016/j.displa.2024.102868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Research on the illusion of self-motion (vection) has primarily focused on younger adults, with few studies including older adults. In light of documented age differences in bottom-up and top-down perception and attention, the current study examined the impact of stimulus properties (speed), cognitive factors (expectancy), and a combination of both (stimulus realism) on vection in younger (18–35 years) and older (65+ years) adults. Participants were led to believe through manipulation of the study instructions that they were either likely or unlikely to experience vection before they were exposed to a rotating visual stimulus aimed to induce circular vection. Realism was manipulated by disrupting the global consistency of the visual stimulus comprised of an intact 360° panoramic photograph, resulting in two images (intact, scrambled). The speed of the stimulus was varied (faster, slower). Vection was measured using self-ratings of onset latency, duration, and intensity. Results showed that intact images produced more vection than scrambled images, especially at faster speeds. In contrast, expectation did not significantly impact vection. Overall, these patterns were similar across both age groups, although younger adults reported earlier vection onsets than older adults at faster speeds. These findings suggest that vection results from an interplay of stimulus-driven and cognitive factors in both younger and older adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50570,"journal":{"name":"Displays","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 102868"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Displays","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141938224002324","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on the illusion of self-motion (vection) has primarily focused on younger adults, with few studies including older adults. In light of documented age differences in bottom-up and top-down perception and attention, the current study examined the impact of stimulus properties (speed), cognitive factors (expectancy), and a combination of both (stimulus realism) on vection in younger (18–35 years) and older (65+ years) adults. Participants were led to believe through manipulation of the study instructions that they were either likely or unlikely to experience vection before they were exposed to a rotating visual stimulus aimed to induce circular vection. Realism was manipulated by disrupting the global consistency of the visual stimulus comprised of an intact 360° panoramic photograph, resulting in two images (intact, scrambled). The speed of the stimulus was varied (faster, slower). Vection was measured using self-ratings of onset latency, duration, and intensity. Results showed that intact images produced more vection than scrambled images, especially at faster speeds. In contrast, expectation did not significantly impact vection. Overall, these patterns were similar across both age groups, although younger adults reported earlier vection onsets than older adults at faster speeds. These findings suggest that vection results from an interplay of stimulus-driven and cognitive factors in both younger and older adults.
图像逼真度和期望值在年轻人和老年人的虚幻自我运动(向量)感知中的作用
关于自我运动错觉(vection)的研究主要集中在年轻人身上,很少有研究涉及老年人。鉴于在自下而上和自上而下的感知和注意力方面存在年龄差异,本研究考察了刺激属性(速度)、认知因素(期望值)以及二者的结合(刺激真实性)对年轻(18-35 岁)和年长(65 岁以上)成年人的自我运动错觉的影响。通过操纵研究说明,让参与者相信,在他们接触旨在诱发环状牵引的旋转视觉刺激之前,他们有可能或不可能经历牵引。通过破坏视觉刺激物(由一张完整的 360° 全景照片组成)的整体一致性来操纵逼真度,从而产生两幅图像(完整的、乱码的)。刺激的速度是变化的(较快、较慢)。通过对起始潜伏期、持续时间和强度进行自我评分来测量视觉效果。结果显示,完整图像比乱码图像产生更多的牵引力,尤其是在速度较快的情况下。相比之下,期望值对牵引力的影响不大。总体而言,这些模式在两个年龄组中都相似,但在速度较快时,年轻成人比老年人更早出现牵引。这些研究结果表明,在年轻人和老年人中,静脉阻断是刺激驱动因素和认知因素相互作用的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Displays
Displays 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
25.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
92 days
期刊介绍: Displays is the international journal covering the research and development of display technology, its effective presentation and perception of information, and applications and systems including display-human interface. Technical papers on practical developments in Displays technology provide an effective channel to promote greater understanding and cross-fertilization across the diverse disciplines of the Displays community. Original research papers solving ergonomics issues at the display-human interface advance effective presentation of information. Tutorial papers covering fundamentals intended for display technologies and human factor engineers new to the field will also occasionally featured.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信