{"title":"Physician Opinions on Artificial Intelligence Chatbots In Dermatology: A National Online Cross-Sectional Survey of Dermatologists.","authors":"Julian Cortes, Taraneh Paravar, Reid Oldenburg","doi":"10.36849/JDD.8239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence chatbots (AIC) have sharply risen in popularity. Dermatology, heavily involving visual, clinical, and pathological pattern-recognition techniques, will be impacted by AIC. Thus, this study aims to categorize the attitudes and beliefs of American dermatologists towards AIC and their potential uses, benefits, and risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to dermatologists across the United States. Questions explored opinions on AIC along with perceived benefits, risks, and important considerations for the incorporation of AIC into the practice of dermatology. Demographic data and self-reported understanding of AIC were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>192 complete responses were received. 53.6% of respondents were female. 44.3% were between ages 30 to 39. 41.1% had 0 to 10 years of experience as attending physicians. 76.5% of participants believed it is somewhat or very likely that AIC will be formally incorporated into dermatology. Higher self-reported understanding of AIC was associated with an increased perceived likelihood of AIC implementation as well as decreased perceived risk associated with AIC. Notably, 86% of respondents believed AIC would impact \"patient education,\" while concerns regarding \"misinformation\" and \"incorrect diagnoses\" were prevalent (89% and 78.5%, respectively). Participants anticipated AIC's role primarily in administrative tasks, with 75.7% citing \"reduced work burden on physicians\" as a potential benefit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dermatologists in the United States foresee the integration of AIC into their practice, emphasizing its potential in administrative roles. Concerns revolve around the complexity of medical understanding and effective patient communication. As AIC continues to evolve, ongoing studies are crucial to evaluate their safety and efficacy in dermatological practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(11):972-978. doi:10.36849/JDD.8239.</p>","PeriodicalId":15566,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Drugs in Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36849/JDD.8239","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence chatbots (AIC) have sharply risen in popularity. Dermatology, heavily involving visual, clinical, and pathological pattern-recognition techniques, will be impacted by AIC. Thus, this study aims to categorize the attitudes and beliefs of American dermatologists towards AIC and their potential uses, benefits, and risks.
Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was distributed to dermatologists across the United States. Questions explored opinions on AIC along with perceived benefits, risks, and important considerations for the incorporation of AIC into the practice of dermatology. Demographic data and self-reported understanding of AIC were also collected.
Results: 192 complete responses were received. 53.6% of respondents were female. 44.3% were between ages 30 to 39. 41.1% had 0 to 10 years of experience as attending physicians. 76.5% of participants believed it is somewhat or very likely that AIC will be formally incorporated into dermatology. Higher self-reported understanding of AIC was associated with an increased perceived likelihood of AIC implementation as well as decreased perceived risk associated with AIC. Notably, 86% of respondents believed AIC would impact "patient education," while concerns regarding "misinformation" and "incorrect diagnoses" were prevalent (89% and 78.5%, respectively). Participants anticipated AIC's role primarily in administrative tasks, with 75.7% citing "reduced work burden on physicians" as a potential benefit.
Conclusion: Dermatologists in the United States foresee the integration of AIC into their practice, emphasizing its potential in administrative roles. Concerns revolve around the complexity of medical understanding and effective patient communication. As AIC continues to evolve, ongoing studies are crucial to evaluate their safety and efficacy in dermatological practice. J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(11):972-978. doi:10.36849/JDD.8239.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Drugs in Dermatology (JDD) is a peer-reviewed publication indexed with MEDLINE®/PubMed® that was founded by the renowned Dr. Perry Robins MD. Founded in 2002, it offers one of the fastest routes to disseminate dermatologic information and is considered the fastest growing publication in dermatology.
We present original articles, award-winning case reports, and timely features pertaining to new methods, techniques, drug therapy, and devices in dermatology that provide readers with peer reviewed content of the utmost quality.
Our high standards of content are maintained through a balanced, peer-review process. Articles are reviewed by an International Editorial Board of over 160 renowned experts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
