The Impact of Visual Distraction Interventions on Patients' Pain and Anxiety During Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Omar Saab, Hasan Al-Obaidi, Nooraldin Merza, Umesh Bhagat, Alhareth Al-Sagban, Marwah Algodi, Mohamed Abuelazm, Hashem El-Serag
{"title":"The Impact of Visual Distraction Interventions on Patients' Pain and Anxiety During Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Omar Saab, Hasan Al-Obaidi, Nooraldin Merza, Umesh Bhagat, Alhareth Al-Sagban, Marwah Algodi, Mohamed Abuelazm, Hashem El-Serag","doi":"10.1097/MCG.0000000000002086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Patients undergoing colonoscopy may experience psychological distress related to the procedure, which may deter adherence and acceptance of future colonoscopies. Visual/audiovisual distraction interventions to alleviate colonoscopy-related pain and anxiety have been developed. This study aims to investigate the impact of these interventions on colonoscopy-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the efficacy of visual/audiovisual distraction. Eligible studies were systematically retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through June 2024 and extracted by 2 investigators. Continuous and dichotomous outcome variables were pooled using Cohen's d and risk ratio (RR) with confidence interval (CI) using Stata MP version 17. We assessed heterogeneity using the χ2 test and I2 statistic (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024555902).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 13 RCTs with 1439 patients randomized to an active intervention (n=804) or usual care (n=635). Only 3 RCTs were endoscopists-blinded studies, whereas the rest were open-label. The interventions included playing nature scene videos, real-time videos of the colonoscopy, or movies preferred by the patients. The active intervention arm was associated with a significant reduction in the pain experienced during colonoscopy (Cohen's d: -0.57, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.35], P<0.0001), reduced anxiety related to colonoscopy (Cohen's d: -0.66, 95% CI [-1.15, -0.18], P=0.01), and increased patients' satisfaction (Cohen's d: 0.65, 95% CI [0.49, 0.80], P<0.0001) compared with patients who received the usual care during colonoscopy. There were no significant differences between both groups in the willingness to re-undergo the procedure (RR: 1.11, 95% CI [0.98, 1.25], P=0.09), analgesia use (Cohen's d: -0.21, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.0], P=0.05), or total procedure duration (Cohen's d: -0.12, 95% CI [-0.24, 0.0], P=0.06).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Visual/audiovisual distraction interventions decrease colonoscopy-associated pain and anxiety and increase patients' satisfaction. These are promising interventions to improve patient compliance and quality of care during colonoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15457,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000002086","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Patients undergoing colonoscopy may experience psychological distress related to the procedure, which may deter adherence and acceptance of future colonoscopies. Visual/audiovisual distraction interventions to alleviate colonoscopy-related pain and anxiety have been developed. This study aims to investigate the impact of these interventions on colonoscopy-related outcomes.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing the efficacy of visual/audiovisual distraction. Eligible studies were systematically retrieved by searching PubMed, EMBASE, WOS, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through June 2024 and extracted by 2 investigators. Continuous and dichotomous outcome variables were pooled using Cohen's d and risk ratio (RR) with confidence interval (CI) using Stata MP version 17. We assessed heterogeneity using the χ2 test and I2 statistic (PROSPERO ID: CRD42024555902).

Results: We included 13 RCTs with 1439 patients randomized to an active intervention (n=804) or usual care (n=635). Only 3 RCTs were endoscopists-blinded studies, whereas the rest were open-label. The interventions included playing nature scene videos, real-time videos of the colonoscopy, or movies preferred by the patients. The active intervention arm was associated with a significant reduction in the pain experienced during colonoscopy (Cohen's d: -0.57, 95% CI [-0.79, -0.35], P<0.0001), reduced anxiety related to colonoscopy (Cohen's d: -0.66, 95% CI [-1.15, -0.18], P=0.01), and increased patients' satisfaction (Cohen's d: 0.65, 95% CI [0.49, 0.80], P<0.0001) compared with patients who received the usual care during colonoscopy. There were no significant differences between both groups in the willingness to re-undergo the procedure (RR: 1.11, 95% CI [0.98, 1.25], P=0.09), analgesia use (Cohen's d: -0.21, 95% CI [-0.42, 0.0], P=0.05), or total procedure duration (Cohen's d: -0.12, 95% CI [-0.24, 0.0], P=0.06).

Conclusions: Visual/audiovisual distraction interventions decrease colonoscopy-associated pain and anxiety and increase patients' satisfaction. These are promising interventions to improve patient compliance and quality of care during colonoscopy.

视觉分散干预对结肠镜检查期间患者疼痛和焦虑的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾和元分析》。
背景和目的:接受结肠镜检查的患者可能会经历与检查相关的心理困扰,这可能会阻碍患者坚持并接受今后的结肠镜检查。目前已开发出视觉/听觉分散注意力干预措施,以减轻结肠镜检查相关的疼痛和焦虑。本研究旨在调查这些干预措施对结肠镜检查相关结果的影响:我们对测试视觉/听觉转移效果的随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。通过搜索 PubMed、EMBASE、WOS、SCOPUS 和 Cochrane,系统检索了截至 2024 年 6 月的符合条件的研究,并由两名研究人员进行了提取。连续和二分结果变量使用 Cohen's d 和风险比 (RR) 进行汇总,并使用 Stata MP 版本 17 进行置信区间 (CI)。我们使用χ2检验和I2统计量(PROSPERO ID:CRD42024555902)评估了异质性:我们纳入了 13 项 RCT,1439 名患者随机接受了积极干预(n=804)或常规护理(n=635)。只有3项研究是内镜医师盲法研究,其余均为开放标签研究。干预措施包括播放自然场景视频、结肠镜检查实时视频或患者喜欢的电影。积极干预组明显减轻了结肠镜检查时的疼痛(Cohen's d:-0.57,95% CI [-0.79,-0.35],PConclusions:视觉/听觉分散注意力干预能减轻结肠镜检查相关的疼痛和焦虑,提高患者的满意度。这些干预措施有望提高结肠镜检查期间患者的依从性和护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of clinical gastroenterology
Journal of clinical gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
339
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology gathers the world''s latest, most relevant clinical studies and reviews, case reports, and technical expertise in a single source. Regular features include cutting-edge, peer-reviewed articles and clinical reviews that put the latest research and development into the context of your practice. Also included are biographies, focused organ reviews, practice management, and therapeutic recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信