Effect of Weight Loss Interventions on the Symptomatic Burden and Biomarkers of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome : A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jadine Scragg, Alice Hobson, Lia Willis, Kathryn S Taylor, Sharon Dixon, Susan A Jebb
{"title":"Effect of Weight Loss Interventions on the Symptomatic Burden and Biomarkers of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome : A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Jadine Scragg, Alice Hobson, Lia Willis, Kathryn S Taylor, Sharon Dixon, Susan A Jebb","doi":"10.7326/M23-3179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is common in women of reproductive age and is associated with obesity. Clinical guidelines recommend weight loss, but the impact on the clinical manifestations of PCOS is unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To quantify the effect of weight loss interventions on clinical features of PCOS, compared with usual care.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and trial registries were searched from inception through June 2024.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized controlled trials comparing interventions aiming to reduce weight against usual care, including lower-intensity weight loss interventions in people with PCOS. Conversations with people with PCOS informed the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Data extraction: </strong>Pairs of independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB). Outcomes included glycemic control (Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance [HOMA-IR], fasting insulin and glucose), hormonal markers (free androgen index [FAI] and other sex hormones), menstrual frequency, hirsutism, and PCOS-related quality of life (QoL). Pooled mean differences were obtained from random-effects meta-analysis with Knapp-Hartung adjustment.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Primary analyses included 29 comparisons with 1529 participants: 13, 12, and 4 comparisons were judged as high, some, or low RoB, respectively. Twelve used behavioral interventions, 9 used glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) agonists, and 8 used other weight loss medications. Weight loss interventions were associated with significantly greater improvements in HOMA-IR (mean difference, -0.45 [-0.75 to -0.15]; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 24%), FAI (mean difference, -2.03 [-3.0 to -1.07]; <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 48%), and menstrual frequency (mean difference, 2.64 [0.65 to 4.63]; <i>I<sup>2</sup></i>  = 43%). There was no evidence that weight loss interventions were associated with clinically or statistically significant improvements in hirsutism, QoL, or other sex hormones, which may be due to the limited power of the available data.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>There was high statistical heterogeneity in the interventions, comparators, and outcomes, largely unexplained by sensitivity and subgroup analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Weight loss interventions were associated with improvements in some important features of PCOS and should be considered as a routine treatment option for people with PCOS.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research School for Primary Care Research. (PROSPERO: CRD42022367488).</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/M23-3179","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is common in women of reproductive age and is associated with obesity. Clinical guidelines recommend weight loss, but the impact on the clinical manifestations of PCOS is unclear.

Purpose: To quantify the effect of weight loss interventions on clinical features of PCOS, compared with usual care.

Data sources: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane, Web of Science, and trial registries were searched from inception through June 2024.

Study selection: Randomized controlled trials comparing interventions aiming to reduce weight against usual care, including lower-intensity weight loss interventions in people with PCOS. Conversations with people with PCOS informed the outcomes.

Data extraction: Pairs of independent reviewers screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias (RoB). Outcomes included glycemic control (Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance [HOMA-IR], fasting insulin and glucose), hormonal markers (free androgen index [FAI] and other sex hormones), menstrual frequency, hirsutism, and PCOS-related quality of life (QoL). Pooled mean differences were obtained from random-effects meta-analysis with Knapp-Hartung adjustment.

Data synthesis: Primary analyses included 29 comparisons with 1529 participants: 13, 12, and 4 comparisons were judged as high, some, or low RoB, respectively. Twelve used behavioral interventions, 9 used glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP1) agonists, and 8 used other weight loss medications. Weight loss interventions were associated with significantly greater improvements in HOMA-IR (mean difference, -0.45 [-0.75 to -0.15]; I 2 = 24%), FAI (mean difference, -2.03 [-3.0 to -1.07]; I 2 = 48%), and menstrual frequency (mean difference, 2.64 [0.65 to 4.63]; I2  = 43%). There was no evidence that weight loss interventions were associated with clinically or statistically significant improvements in hirsutism, QoL, or other sex hormones, which may be due to the limited power of the available data.

Limitation: There was high statistical heterogeneity in the interventions, comparators, and outcomes, largely unexplained by sensitivity and subgroup analyses.

Conclusion: Weight loss interventions were associated with improvements in some important features of PCOS and should be considered as a routine treatment option for people with PCOS.

Primary funding source: National Institute for Health and Care Research School for Primary Care Research. (PROSPERO: CRD42022367488).

减肥干预对多囊卵巢综合征症状负担和生物标志物的影响:随机对照试验的系统回顾。
背景:多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)是育龄妇女的常见病,与肥胖有关。目的:与常规治疗相比,量化减肥干预对多囊卵巢综合征临床特征的影响:数据来源:检索了MEDLINE、Embase、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Cochrane、Web of Science以及从开始到2024年6月的试验登记:随机对照试验:比较旨在减轻体重的干预措施和常规护理,包括针对多囊卵巢综合症患者的低强度减肥干预措施。数据提取:一对独立审稿人筛选研究、提取数据并评估偏倚风险(RoB)。研究结果包括血糖控制(胰岛素抵抗稳态模型评估[HOMA-IR]、空腹胰岛素和葡萄糖)、激素指标(游离雄激素指数[FAI]和其他性激素)、月经频率、多毛症以及与多囊卵巢综合征相关的生活质量(QoL)。通过随机效应荟萃分析和 Knapp-Hartung 调整得出汇总平均差异:主要分析包括 29 项比较,1529 名参与者:分别有 13、12 和 4 项比较被判定为高 RoB、部分 RoB 或低 RoB。其中 12 项采用行为干预,9 项采用胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP1)激动剂,8 项采用其他减肥药物。减肥干预与 HOMA-IR (平均差异为 -0.45 [-0.75 至 -0.15];I 2 = 24%)、FAI(平均差异为 -2.03 [-3.0 至 -1.07] ;I 2 = 48%)和月经频率(平均差异为 2.64 [0.65 至 4.63];I2 = 43%)的显著改善相关。没有证据表明减肥干预与多毛症、QoL或其他性激素的临床或统计学显著改善有关,这可能是由于现有数据的力量有限:局限性:干预措施、比较对象和结果在统计学上存在高度异质性,这在很大程度上无法通过敏感性分析和亚组分析来解释:减肥干预与多囊卵巢综合症某些重要特征的改善有关,应被视为多囊卵巢综合症患者的常规治疗方案:主要资金来源:国家健康与护理研究所初级护理研究学院。(prospero:CRD42022367488)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信