Benefit equity of social health insurance in China and its provinces (2014-2020): implications for universal health coverage.

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yaoyun Zhang, Anne Mills, Jin Xu
{"title":"Benefit equity of social health insurance in China and its provinces (2014-2020): implications for universal health coverage.","authors":"Yaoyun Zhang, Anne Mills, Jin Xu","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014806","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>China has increased fiscal input into social health insurance (SHI) schemes to achieve universal health coverage. Our study aimed to examine the equity of SHI benefits in the country and five representative provinces over the period of 2014-2020.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed nationally and subnationally representative data from four waves (2014, 2016, 2018 and 2020) of the China Family Panel Studies. Benefit relative to consumption was assessed using concentration indices and concentration curves. We compared benefit distribution against health need across consumption quintiles. We further decomposed the change in the concentration index from 2014 to 2020.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The national concentration index for SHI benefit was pro-rich but became substantially less so over time, falling from 0.262 in 2014 to 0.133 in 2020. Poorer quintiles suffered more ill health but received a smaller share of SHI benefits compared with the richer quintiles. All five provinces improved in benefit equity to varying degrees. Reduced disparity between employee and resident schemes, and use of hospitals as the usual source of care, accounted for 44.47% and 14.70%, respectively, of the national improvement in SHI benefit equity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The benefit equity of SHI in China has improved, likely influenced by the narrowing funding gap between resident and employee scheme benefits. However, benefits remained skewed towards the richer groups with lower health need, revealing the resilience of an 'Inverse Benefit Law'. We suggest risk-equalisation of SHI funds and coordinated reform in health financing and service delivery towards a greater focus on primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"9 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014806","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: China has increased fiscal input into social health insurance (SHI) schemes to achieve universal health coverage. Our study aimed to examine the equity of SHI benefits in the country and five representative provinces over the period of 2014-2020.

Methods: We analysed nationally and subnationally representative data from four waves (2014, 2016, 2018 and 2020) of the China Family Panel Studies. Benefit relative to consumption was assessed using concentration indices and concentration curves. We compared benefit distribution against health need across consumption quintiles. We further decomposed the change in the concentration index from 2014 to 2020.

Results: The national concentration index for SHI benefit was pro-rich but became substantially less so over time, falling from 0.262 in 2014 to 0.133 in 2020. Poorer quintiles suffered more ill health but received a smaller share of SHI benefits compared with the richer quintiles. All five provinces improved in benefit equity to varying degrees. Reduced disparity between employee and resident schemes, and use of hospitals as the usual source of care, accounted for 44.47% and 14.70%, respectively, of the national improvement in SHI benefit equity.

Conclusion: The benefit equity of SHI in China has improved, likely influenced by the narrowing funding gap between resident and employee scheme benefits. However, benefits remained skewed towards the richer groups with lower health need, revealing the resilience of an 'Inverse Benefit Law'. We suggest risk-equalisation of SHI funds and coordinated reform in health financing and service delivery towards a greater focus on primary care.

中国及各省社会医疗保险的受益公平性(2014-2020 年):对全民医保的影响》。
导言:为实现全民医保,中国加大了对社会医疗保险(SHI)的财政投入。我们的研究旨在考察 2014-2020 年间全国及五个代表性省份的社会医疗保险福利的公平性:我们分析了中国家庭面板研究四次波次(2014 年、2016 年、2018 年和 2020 年)中具有全国和次全国代表性的数据。使用浓度指数和浓度曲线评估了相对于消费量的益处。我们比较了不同消费五分位数的受益分布与健康需求。我们进一步分解了 2014 年至 2020 年集中指数的变化:结果:全国社会医疗保险福利的集中指数有利于富裕人群,但随着时间的推移,集中指数大幅下降,从 2014 年的 0.262 降至 2020 年的 0.133。与较富裕的五分之一人口相比,较贫穷的五分之一人口健康状况更差,但获得的社会保险福利份额却更小。所有五个省份都在不同程度上改善了福利公平性。职工医保和居民医保之间差距的缩小,以及将医院作为通常的医疗来源,分别占全国社会医疗保险福利公平性改善的 44.47% 和 14.70%:结论:中国的社会保险福利公平性有所改善,这可能是受居民计划和职工计划福利资金缺口缩小的影响。然而,保险金仍然向健康需求较低的富裕群体倾斜,这揭示了 "反向受益法 "的顽固性。我们建议对社会医疗保险基金进行风险均等化,并对医疗融资和服务提供进行协调改革,以更加注重初级保健。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信