Protocol for scoping review: Mapping the landscape of acute pain management in sports-related musculoskeletal injuries.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1111/aas.14547
Ibrahim Mohammed Abdul Khalek, Zeynep N Mert, Ann Merete Møller
{"title":"Protocol for scoping review: Mapping the landscape of acute pain management in sports-related musculoskeletal injuries.","authors":"Ibrahim Mohammed Abdul Khalek, Zeynep N Mert, Ann Merete Møller","doi":"10.1111/aas.14547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute pain management is critical in sports-related musculoskeletal injuries to facilitate recovery and minimize long-term impact. While current practices vary, incorporating both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, the quality and breadth of existing evidence have not been thoroughly assessed. This scoping review aims to explore the clinical role of different pain management strategies and provide a comprehensive overview of the field.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Searches will be conducted in major peer-reviewed databases and relevant gray literature. Studies involving athletes of any level undergoing treatment for acute musculoskeletal injuries will be considered. Data extraction will include study and participant characteristics, intervention details, reported outcomes, efficacy comparisons, and economic analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review will provide a descriptive synthesis of the data, utilizing statistical analysis, figures, and tables where relevant to introduce the different treatment modalities. In line with PRISMA-P and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this scoping review incorporates studies of diverse designs. The data synthesis involves descriptive statistics and narrative presentations, aimed at exploring the relationship between study results and research objectives.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review will evaluate various pain management interventions for acute musculoskeletal injuries in sports, mapping the current evidence and identifying gaps in research. The findings will help inform clinical practices and guide future research efforts to optimize pain management strategies in sports medicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"e14547"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14547","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acute pain management is critical in sports-related musculoskeletal injuries to facilitate recovery and minimize long-term impact. While current practices vary, incorporating both pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches, the quality and breadth of existing evidence have not been thoroughly assessed. This scoping review aims to explore the clinical role of different pain management strategies and provide a comprehensive overview of the field.

Methods: The review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews and adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Searches will be conducted in major peer-reviewed databases and relevant gray literature. Studies involving athletes of any level undergoing treatment for acute musculoskeletal injuries will be considered. Data extraction will include study and participant characteristics, intervention details, reported outcomes, efficacy comparisons, and economic analyses.

Results: This review will provide a descriptive synthesis of the data, utilizing statistical analysis, figures, and tables where relevant to introduce the different treatment modalities. In line with PRISMA-P and PRISMA-ScR guidelines, this scoping review incorporates studies of diverse designs. The data synthesis involves descriptive statistics and narrative presentations, aimed at exploring the relationship between study results and research objectives.

Conclusion: This scoping review will evaluate various pain management interventions for acute musculoskeletal injuries in sports, mapping the current evidence and identifying gaps in research. The findings will help inform clinical practices and guide future research efforts to optimize pain management strategies in sports medicine.

范围界定审查协议:绘制运动相关肌肉骨骼损伤急性疼痛管理图。
背景:急性疼痛治疗对运动相关肌肉骨骼损伤至关重要,可促进康复并将长期影响降至最低。虽然目前的做法各不相同,既有药物疗法,也有非药物疗法,但现有证据的质量和广度尚未得到全面评估。本范围综述旨在探讨不同疼痛管理策略的临床作用,并提供该领域的全面概述:本综述将遵循乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute,JBI)的范围界定综述方法,并遵守范围界定综述的系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis for Scoping Reviews,PRISMA-ScR)指南。检索将在主要的同行评审数据库和相关灰色文献中进行。将考虑涉及接受急性肌肉骨骼损伤治疗的任何级别运动员的研究。数据提取将包括研究和参与者特征、干预细节、报告结果、疗效比较和经济分析:本综述将对数据进行描述性综合,利用统计分析、相关数字和表格来介绍不同的治疗方式。根据 PRISMA-P 和 PRISMA-ScR 指南,本范围综述纳入了不同设计的研究。数据综合包括描述性统计和叙述性陈述,旨在探讨研究结果与研究目标之间的关系:本范围界定综述将评估针对运动中急性肌肉骨骼损伤的各种疼痛管理干预措施,绘制当前证据图并确定研究缺口。研究结果将有助于为临床实践提供信息,并指导未来的研究工作,以优化运动医学中的疼痛管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信