Analysis of Price- and Services-Related Preferences for Nursing Homes in Japan Using a Nested Logit Model in Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis

IF 1 Q4 GERONTOLOGY
Suzuki Makoto
{"title":"Analysis of Price- and Services-Related Preferences for Nursing Homes in Japan Using a Nested Logit Model in Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis","authors":"Suzuki Makoto","doi":"10.1007/s12126-024-09582-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nursing homes (NHs) play an important role in ensuring that older adults have a place to live. However, few quantitative studies have examined NH prices and services vis-à-vis users’ preferences. Therefore, in this study, we used a choice-based conjoint analysis to examine price- and services-related needs for NHs according to respondents’ age. The survey was conducted in Osaka, Japan, where 130 community-dwelling individuals were divided into two age groups: 40–50 s (<i>n</i> = 65)—comprising individuals whose parents or relatives were expected to need long-term care—and <b>≥</b> 60 (<i>n</i> = 65)—comprising individuals who were expected to need long-term care. Prior to analysis, we determined that a nested logit model was appropriate for this study. We examined the marginal effects of prices and services. The results showed that good healthcare had a positive and significant effect on the preferences of the 40–50 s group, whereas this effect was absent in the <b>≥</b> 60 group. In both groups, good life support had a significant positive effect on preference. However, the marginal effect of good life support was larger for the 40–50 s group because fewer people chose not to move into an NH, suggesting the need for a more detailed analysis of the 40–50 s group. This study’s results provide valuable insights regarding pre-purchase decision-making for NH selection, which is currently determined based on post-purchase activity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51665,"journal":{"name":"Ageing International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ageing International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12126-024-09582-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nursing homes (NHs) play an important role in ensuring that older adults have a place to live. However, few quantitative studies have examined NH prices and services vis-à-vis users’ preferences. Therefore, in this study, we used a choice-based conjoint analysis to examine price- and services-related needs for NHs according to respondents’ age. The survey was conducted in Osaka, Japan, where 130 community-dwelling individuals were divided into two age groups: 40–50 s (n = 65)—comprising individuals whose parents or relatives were expected to need long-term care—and  60 (n = 65)—comprising individuals who were expected to need long-term care. Prior to analysis, we determined that a nested logit model was appropriate for this study. We examined the marginal effects of prices and services. The results showed that good healthcare had a positive and significant effect on the preferences of the 40–50 s group, whereas this effect was absent in the  60 group. In both groups, good life support had a significant positive effect on preference. However, the marginal effect of good life support was larger for the 40–50 s group because fewer people chose not to move into an NH, suggesting the need for a more detailed analysis of the 40–50 s group. This study’s results provide valuable insights regarding pre-purchase decision-making for NH selection, which is currently determined based on post-purchase activity.

在基于选择的联合分析中使用嵌套 Logit 模型分析日本养老院的价格和服务相关偏好
养老院(NH)在确保老年人有地方居住方面发挥着重要作用。然而,很少有定量研究对养老院的价格和服务与用户偏好的关系进行研究。因此,在本研究中,我们采用了基于选择的联合分析方法,根据受访者的年龄来研究与价格和服务相关的养老院需求。调查在日本大阪进行,130 名社区居民被分为两个年龄组:40-50 岁(n = 65)--包括其父母或亲属预计需要长期护理的人和≥ 60 岁(n = 65)--包括预计需要长期护理的人。在分析之前,我们确定嵌套 logit 模型适合本研究。我们考察了价格和服务的边际效应。结果显示,良好的医疗保健对 40-50 岁年龄组的偏好有积极而显著的影响,而在≥ 60 岁年龄组中则没有这种影响。在这两个组别中,良好的生活支持对偏好都有显著的积极影响。然而,在 40-50 岁组中,良好生活支持的边际效应更大,因为选择不搬进养老院的人更少,这表明有必要对 40-50 岁组进行更详细的分析。这项研究的结果为人们在购买前选择养老院的决策提供了有价值的启示,目前养老院的选择是根据购买后的活动来决定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ageing International
Ageing International GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: As a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that has existed for over three decades, Ageing International serves all professionals who deal with complex ageing issues. The journal is dedicated to improving the life of ageing populations worldwide through providing an intellectual forum for communicating common concerns, exchanging analyses and discoveries in scientific research, crystallizing significant issues, and offering recommendations in ageing-related service delivery and policy making. Besides encouraging the submission of high-quality research and review papers, Ageing International seeks to bring together researchers, policy analysts, and service program administrators who are committed to reducing the ''implementation gap'' between good science and effective service, between evidence-based protocol and culturally suitable programs, and between unique innovative solutions and generalizable policies. For significant issues that are common across countries, Ageing International will organize special forums for scholars and investigators from different disciplines to present their regional perspectives as well as to provide more comprehensive analysis. The editors strongly believe that such discourse has the potential to foster a wide range of coordinated efforts that will lead to improvements in the quality of life of older persons worldwide. Abstracted and Indexed in: ABI/INFORM, Academic OneFile, Academic Search, CSA/Proquest, Current Abstracts, EBSCO, Ergonomics Abstracts, Expanded Academic, Gale, Google Scholar, Health Reference Center Academic, OCLC, PsychINFO, PsyARTICLES, SCOPUS, Social Science Abstracts, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信