The association between pretransplant malignancy and post-transplant survival and cancer recurrence in bilateral lung transplantation: An analysis of 23,291 recipients

Wongi Woo MD , Hye Sung Kim MD , Ankit Bharat MBBS , Young Kwang Chae MD, PhD, MBA
{"title":"The association between pretransplant malignancy and post-transplant survival and cancer recurrence in bilateral lung transplantation: An analysis of 23,291 recipients","authors":"Wongi Woo MD ,&nbsp;Hye Sung Kim MD ,&nbsp;Ankit Bharat MBBS ,&nbsp;Young Kwang Chae MD, PhD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Given the increasing need for lung transplants among older patients with a history of cancer, this study analyzed database registry to assess outcomes for bilateral lung transplant (BLT) recipients with pre-transplant malignancy (TM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study evaluated the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for adult BLT performed between 2005 and 2023. Patients with a history of previous or multiorgan transplants, and those with donors who had cancer history, were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to compare patients with or without pre-TM. Overall and post-TM-free survival were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 23,291 recipients of BLT, 8.0% (1,870) had pre-TM. Compared to those without pre-TM, patients with pre-TM had worse overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.29, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) and post-TM-free survival (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.24-1.41, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). However, after adjusting for age, sex, and race through propensity score matching, the survival difference between the groups became nonsignificant (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.13, <em>p</em> = 0.229). While the pre-TM group still had worse post-TM-free survival, this difference diminished after excluding cutaneous post-TM (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.15, <em>p</em> = 0.116). Additionally, the recurrence rate of pre-TM after transplant was not higher than de novo cancers in patients without pre-TM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with pre-TM had similar survival rates after BLT as those without pre-TM. Importantly, there was no increased risk of the primary pre-TM type recurring post-transplant compared to patients without pre-TM. If patients with pre-TM are free from recurrence or metastasis for a significant time, there could be some who can benefit from BLT. Further data regarding timeline between pre-TM and BLT would be necessary to draw conclusion in this issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133424001101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Given the increasing need for lung transplants among older patients with a history of cancer, this study analyzed database registry to assess outcomes for bilateral lung transplant (BLT) recipients with pre-transplant malignancy (TM).

Methods

This study evaluated the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for adult BLT performed between 2005 and 2023. Patients with a history of previous or multiorgan transplants, and those with donors who had cancer history, were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to compare patients with or without pre-TM. Overall and post-TM-free survival were analyzed.

Results

Among the 23,291 recipients of BLT, 8.0% (1,870) had pre-TM. Compared to those without pre-TM, patients with pre-TM had worse overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.29, p < 0.001) and post-TM-free survival (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.24-1.41, p < 0.001). However, after adjusting for age, sex, and race through propensity score matching, the survival difference between the groups became nonsignificant (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.13, p = 0.229). While the pre-TM group still had worse post-TM-free survival, this difference diminished after excluding cutaneous post-TM (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.15, p = 0.116). Additionally, the recurrence rate of pre-TM after transplant was not higher than de novo cancers in patients without pre-TM.

Conclusions

Patients with pre-TM had similar survival rates after BLT as those without pre-TM. Importantly, there was no increased risk of the primary pre-TM type recurring post-transplant compared to patients without pre-TM. If patients with pre-TM are free from recurrence or metastasis for a significant time, there could be some who can benefit from BLT. Further data regarding timeline between pre-TM and BLT would be necessary to draw conclusion in this issue.
双肺移植中移植前恶性肿瘤与移植后存活率和癌症复发之间的关系:对 23,291 例受者的分析
背景鉴于有癌症病史的老年患者对肺移植的需求日益增加,本研究分析了数据库登记情况,以评估移植前患有恶性肿瘤(TM)的双侧肺移植(BLT)受者的预后。方法本研究评估了器官共享联合网络(United Network for Organ Sharing)登记的 2005 年至 2023 年期间进行的成人 BLT。排除了既往有器官移植史或多器官移植史的患者,以及供体有癌症史的患者。采用倾向得分匹配法对有无TM前的患者进行比较。结果在23,291名BLT受者中,8.0%(1,870人)有前TM。与没有前骨髓瘤的患者相比,前骨髓瘤患者的总生存率(危险比 [HR] 1.20,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.12-1.29,p <0.001)和无骨髓瘤后生存率(HR 1.32,95% CI 1.24-1.41,p <0.001)更差。然而,通过倾向得分匹配调整年龄、性别和种族后,组间生存率差异变得不显著(HR 1.05,95% CI 0.97-1.13,p = 0.229)。虽然TM前组的无TM后生存率仍然较低,但在排除皮肤TM后,这一差异有所缩小(HR 1.06,95% CI 0.99-1.15,p = 0.116)。此外,前TM患者移植后的复发率并不比无前TM患者的新发癌症高。重要的是,与没有前TM的患者相比,原发性前TM类型在移植后复发的风险并没有增加。如果前骨髓瘤患者在相当长的时间内没有复发或转移,可能会有一些人从 BLT 中获益。要就此问题得出结论,有必要进一步收集有关前骨髓瘤和 BLT 之间时间关系的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信