The association between pretransplant malignancy and post-transplant survival and cancer recurrence in bilateral lung transplantation: An analysis of 23,291 recipients
Wongi Woo MD , Hye Sung Kim MD , Ankit Bharat MBBS , Young Kwang Chae MD, PhD, MBA
{"title":"The association between pretransplant malignancy and post-transplant survival and cancer recurrence in bilateral lung transplantation: An analysis of 23,291 recipients","authors":"Wongi Woo MD , Hye Sung Kim MD , Ankit Bharat MBBS , Young Kwang Chae MD, PhD, MBA","doi":"10.1016/j.jhlto.2024.100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Given the increasing need for lung transplants among older patients with a history of cancer, this study analyzed database registry to assess outcomes for bilateral lung transplant (BLT) recipients with pre-transplant malignancy (TM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study evaluated the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for adult BLT performed between 2005 and 2023. Patients with a history of previous or multiorgan transplants, and those with donors who had cancer history, were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to compare patients with or without pre-TM. Overall and post-TM-free survival were analyzed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among the 23,291 recipients of BLT, 8.0% (1,870) had pre-TM. Compared to those without pre-TM, patients with pre-TM had worse overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.29, <em>p</em> < 0.001) and post-TM-free survival (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.24-1.41, <em>p</em> < 0.001). However, after adjusting for age, sex, and race through propensity score matching, the survival difference between the groups became nonsignificant (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.13, <em>p</em> = 0.229). While the pre-TM group still had worse post-TM-free survival, this difference diminished after excluding cutaneous post-TM (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.15, <em>p</em> = 0.116). Additionally, the recurrence rate of pre-TM after transplant was not higher than de novo cancers in patients without pre-TM.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with pre-TM had similar survival rates after BLT as those without pre-TM. Importantly, there was no increased risk of the primary pre-TM type recurring post-transplant compared to patients without pre-TM. If patients with pre-TM are free from recurrence or metastasis for a significant time, there could be some who can benefit from BLT. Further data regarding timeline between pre-TM and BLT would be necessary to draw conclusion in this issue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100741,"journal":{"name":"JHLT Open","volume":"7 ","pages":"Article 100161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JHLT Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950133424001101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Given the increasing need for lung transplants among older patients with a history of cancer, this study analyzed database registry to assess outcomes for bilateral lung transplant (BLT) recipients with pre-transplant malignancy (TM).
Methods
This study evaluated the United Network for Organ Sharing registry for adult BLT performed between 2005 and 2023. Patients with a history of previous or multiorgan transplants, and those with donors who had cancer history, were excluded. Propensity score matching was used to compare patients with or without pre-TM. Overall and post-TM-free survival were analyzed.
Results
Among the 23,291 recipients of BLT, 8.0% (1,870) had pre-TM. Compared to those without pre-TM, patients with pre-TM had worse overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.29, p < 0.001) and post-TM-free survival (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.24-1.41, p < 0.001). However, after adjusting for age, sex, and race through propensity score matching, the survival difference between the groups became nonsignificant (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97-1.13, p = 0.229). While the pre-TM group still had worse post-TM-free survival, this difference diminished after excluding cutaneous post-TM (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.99-1.15, p = 0.116). Additionally, the recurrence rate of pre-TM after transplant was not higher than de novo cancers in patients without pre-TM.
Conclusions
Patients with pre-TM had similar survival rates after BLT as those without pre-TM. Importantly, there was no increased risk of the primary pre-TM type recurring post-transplant compared to patients without pre-TM. If patients with pre-TM are free from recurrence or metastasis for a significant time, there could be some who can benefit from BLT. Further data regarding timeline between pre-TM and BLT would be necessary to draw conclusion in this issue.