Does the tendency to overestimate future emotions motivate practice in young children?

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Shalini Gautam , Giang Nguyen , Jonathan Redshaw , Thomas Suddendorf
{"title":"Does the tendency to overestimate future emotions motivate practice in young children?","authors":"Shalini Gautam ,&nbsp;Giang Nguyen ,&nbsp;Jonathan Redshaw ,&nbsp;Thomas Suddendorf","doi":"10.1016/j.cogdev.2024.101515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Young children and adults tend to overestimate the intensity of their emotional responses to future events. This intensity bias has been proposed to motivate future oriented behaviour. In two studies (N=210) we investigated if the magnitude of the intensity bias was associated with increased practice for an upcoming ‘championship game’. Children (4–8 years) anticipated their emotional response towards losing the championship game, and were then given free time where they could practice in preparation, or play a distractor game. We measured the time children spent playing and the number of attempts they made in the target game. Children reported their emotions once again after they lost the championship game, which was set up to be too difficult to win. Replicating previous findings, children predicted they would feel sadder to lose the game than they ended up reporting actually feeling when they lost. Planned analyses in study 1 revealed no association between the intensity bias and spending more time, or making more attempts, in the target game. However, post hoc analyses found that a greater intensity bias predicted children spending more time per attempt in the target game. This result was replicated in a new sample of children in study 2. We discuss how this finding may support the possibility that the intensity bias functions to motivate future-oriented behaviour.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51422,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Development","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088520142400100X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Young children and adults tend to overestimate the intensity of their emotional responses to future events. This intensity bias has been proposed to motivate future oriented behaviour. In two studies (N=210) we investigated if the magnitude of the intensity bias was associated with increased practice for an upcoming ‘championship game’. Children (4–8 years) anticipated their emotional response towards losing the championship game, and were then given free time where they could practice in preparation, or play a distractor game. We measured the time children spent playing and the number of attempts they made in the target game. Children reported their emotions once again after they lost the championship game, which was set up to be too difficult to win. Replicating previous findings, children predicted they would feel sadder to lose the game than they ended up reporting actually feeling when they lost. Planned analyses in study 1 revealed no association between the intensity bias and spending more time, or making more attempts, in the target game. However, post hoc analyses found that a greater intensity bias predicted children spending more time per attempt in the target game. This result was replicated in a new sample of children in study 2. We discuss how this finding may support the possibility that the intensity bias functions to motivate future-oriented behaviour.
高估未来情绪的倾向是否会激发幼儿的练习?
幼儿和成年人往往会高估自己对未来事件的情绪反应强度。这种强度偏差被认为是未来行为的动机。在两项研究(N=210)中,我们调查了强度偏差的大小是否与即将到来的 "冠军赛 "的练习增加有关。孩子们(4-8 岁)预计了他们对输掉冠军赛的情绪反应,然后给他们自由时间,让他们练习准备,或玩一个分散注意力的游戏。我们测量了孩子们在目标游戏中的游戏时间和尝试次数。在输掉冠军游戏后,孩子们再次报告了他们的情绪。与之前的研究结果相同,孩子们预测自己输掉游戏后会感到更难过,而他们最终报告的输掉游戏后的实际感受却不尽相同。研究 1 的计划分析表明,强度偏差与在目标游戏中花费更多时间或进行更多尝试之间没有关联。然而,事后分析发现,强度偏差越大,儿童每次尝试目标游戏的时间就越长。在研究 2 中,这一结果在新的儿童样本中得到了验证。我们将讨论这一结果如何支持强度偏差激励未来行为的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: Cognitive Development contains the very best empirical and theoretical work on the development of perception, memory, language, concepts, thinking, problem solving, metacognition, and social cognition. Criteria for acceptance of articles will be: significance of the work to issues of current interest, substance of the argument, and clarity of expression. For purposes of publication in Cognitive Development, moral and social development will be considered part of cognitive development when they are related to the development of knowledge or thought processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信