Evaluation of criterion-based audit in improving quality of neonatal birth asphyxia care at Balaka district hospital in Malawi.

Chank Mwalweni, Ellen Mbweza Chirwa, Eveles Banda Chimala, Mirriam Window Shaba, Leone Lowole, Lucia Kasawala, Christina Kalawa Mwakhundi
{"title":"Evaluation of criterion-based audit in improving quality of neonatal birth asphyxia care at Balaka district hospital in Malawi.","authors":"Chank Mwalweni, Ellen Mbweza Chirwa, Eveles Banda Chimala, Mirriam Window Shaba, Leone Lowole, Lucia Kasawala, Christina Kalawa Mwakhundi","doi":"10.1186/s40748-024-00191-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Birth asphyxia remains one of the leading causes of neonatal deaths worldwide with a higher incidence in resource limited countries such as Malawi. At Balaka district hospital, Birth asphyxia is the primary cause of neonatal mortality accounting for 37.3% of the district's neonatal deaths. Although various quality improvement initiatives on birth asphyxia such as Helping Babies Breathe have been documented in Malawi, there is limited information on use of criterion-based audit (CBA) to enhance the care of neonates with birth asphyxia. Criterion-based audit is a systematic and critical analysis that seeks to improve quality of care by reviewing cases against an explicit criterion and using findings to modify practice as necessary. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of CBA in improving the quality of neonatal birth asphyxia care at Balaka district hospital in Malawi.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A CBA on the care of asphyxiated neonates was conducted at Balaka district hospital in Malawi. The care practices were assessed through a retrospective review of 110 cases notes which were selected by systematic random sampling technique. The care practices were compared with locally established standards, by a multidisciplinary team, based on the Malawi guidelines on care of the infant and newborn and World Health Organization documents. The gaps in the current practice were identified, reasons discussed, and recommendations were made and implemented. A re-audit was conducted on 110 case notes, six months after the initial audit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The re-audit showed significant improvements in most of the set criteria for quality care: Checking of vital signs (80% vs. 98.2%; p = 0.000), laboratory investigations done (0.9% vs. 74%; p = 0.000), thermal support (82.7% vs. 91.8%; p = 0.041), correct diagnosis (60% vs. 81%; p = 0.001), correct treatment (18.7% vs. 81%; p = 0.000), correct feeding (12.7% vs. 56.4%; p = 0.000), Clinical officers conducting ward rounds (0% vs. 72%; p = 0.000), and daily weight check (49.1% vs. 93%; p = 0.000). Additionally, neonatal death decreased from 11% in the initial audit to 5% in the re-audit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Criterion-based audit is a low-cost tool that can significantly improve the care of neonates with birth asphyxia in resource-limited countries.</p>","PeriodicalId":74120,"journal":{"name":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","volume":"10 1","pages":"21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11533281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40748-024-00191-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Birth asphyxia remains one of the leading causes of neonatal deaths worldwide with a higher incidence in resource limited countries such as Malawi. At Balaka district hospital, Birth asphyxia is the primary cause of neonatal mortality accounting for 37.3% of the district's neonatal deaths. Although various quality improvement initiatives on birth asphyxia such as Helping Babies Breathe have been documented in Malawi, there is limited information on use of criterion-based audit (CBA) to enhance the care of neonates with birth asphyxia. Criterion-based audit is a systematic and critical analysis that seeks to improve quality of care by reviewing cases against an explicit criterion and using findings to modify practice as necessary. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of CBA in improving the quality of neonatal birth asphyxia care at Balaka district hospital in Malawi.

Methods: A CBA on the care of asphyxiated neonates was conducted at Balaka district hospital in Malawi. The care practices were assessed through a retrospective review of 110 cases notes which were selected by systematic random sampling technique. The care practices were compared with locally established standards, by a multidisciplinary team, based on the Malawi guidelines on care of the infant and newborn and World Health Organization documents. The gaps in the current practice were identified, reasons discussed, and recommendations were made and implemented. A re-audit was conducted on 110 case notes, six months after the initial audit.

Results: The re-audit showed significant improvements in most of the set criteria for quality care: Checking of vital signs (80% vs. 98.2%; p = 0.000), laboratory investigations done (0.9% vs. 74%; p = 0.000), thermal support (82.7% vs. 91.8%; p = 0.041), correct diagnosis (60% vs. 81%; p = 0.001), correct treatment (18.7% vs. 81%; p = 0.000), correct feeding (12.7% vs. 56.4%; p = 0.000), Clinical officers conducting ward rounds (0% vs. 72%; p = 0.000), and daily weight check (49.1% vs. 93%; p = 0.000). Additionally, neonatal death decreased from 11% in the initial audit to 5% in the re-audit.

Conclusion: Criterion-based audit is a low-cost tool that can significantly improve the care of neonates with birth asphyxia in resource-limited countries.

马拉维巴拉卡地区医院在提高新生儿出生窒息护理质量方面的标准审计评估。
背景:出生窒息仍是全球新生儿死亡的主要原因之一,在马拉维等资源有限的国家,出生窒息的发生率更高。在巴拉卡地区医院,出生窒息是新生儿死亡的主要原因,占该地区新生儿死亡人数的 37.3%。虽然马拉维有各种针对出生窒息的质量改进措施,如 "帮助婴儿呼吸"(Helping Babies Breathe),但有关使用基于标准的审核(CBA)来加强出生窒息新生儿护理的信息却很有限。基于标准的审核是一种系统性和批判性的分析,旨在通过对照明确的标准审查病例,并利用审查结果对实践进行必要的修改,从而提高护理质量。本研究旨在评估基于标准的审核在提高马拉维巴拉卡地区医院新生儿出生窒息护理质量方面的效果:方法:在马拉维巴拉卡地区医院开展了新生儿窒息护理的CBA。通过系统随机抽样技术,对 110 份病例记录进行了回顾性审查,评估了护理方法。多学科小组根据马拉维婴儿和新生儿护理指南以及世界卫生组织的文件,将护理方法与当地制定的标准进行了比较。找出了现行做法中的不足,讨论了原因,并提出和实施了建议。在首次审计六个月后,对 110 份病例记录进行了再次审计:重新审核结果显示,大部分优质护理标准都有明显改善:生命体征检查(80% 对 98.2%;P = 0.000)、实验室检查(0.9% 对 74%;P = 0.000)、热支持(82.7% 对 91.8%;P = 0.041)、正确诊断(60% 对 81%;P = 0.001)、正确治疗(18.7% 对 81%;p = 0.000)、正确喂养(12.7% 对 56.4%;p = 0.000)、临床医生查房(0% 对 72%;p = 0.000)和每日体重检查(49.1% 对 93%;p = 0.000)。此外,新生儿死亡率从初次审核的 11% 降至再次审核的 5%:基于标准的审核是一种低成本的工具,可显著改善资源有限国家的新生儿出生窒息护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信