Implementing sensor-based digital health technologies in clinical trials: Key considerations from the eCOA Consortium

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Elena S. Izmailova, Danielle Middleton, Reem Yunis, Julia Lakeland, Kristen Sowalsky, Julia Kling, Alison Ritchie, Christine C. Guo, Bill Byrom, Scottie Kern
{"title":"Implementing sensor-based digital health technologies in clinical trials: Key considerations from the eCOA Consortium","authors":"Elena S. Izmailova,&nbsp;Danielle Middleton,&nbsp;Reem Yunis,&nbsp;Julia Lakeland,&nbsp;Kristen Sowalsky,&nbsp;Julia Kling,&nbsp;Alison Ritchie,&nbsp;Christine C. Guo,&nbsp;Bill Byrom,&nbsp;Scottie Kern","doi":"10.1111/cts.70054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The increased use of sensor-based digital health technologies (DHTs) in clinical trials brought to light concerns about implementation practices that might introduce burden on trial participants, resulting in suboptimal compliance and become an additional complicating factor in clinical trial conduct. These concerns may contribute to the lower-than-anticipated uptake of DHT deployment and data use for regulatory decision-making, despite well-articulated benefits. The Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) Consortium gathered collective experience on deploying sensor-based DHTs and supplemented this with relevant literature focusing on mechanisms that may enhance participant compliance. The process for DHT implementation starts with identifying a clinical concept of interest followed by a digital measure selection, defining active or passive data capture and their sources, the number of sensors with respective body location, plus the duration and frequency of use in the context of perceived participant burden. Roundtable discussions among patient groups, physicians, and technology providers prior to protocol development can be very impactful for optimizing trial design. While diversity and inclusion are essential for any clinical trial, patient populations should be considered carefully in the context of trial-specific aims, requirements, and anticipated patient burden. Minimizing site burden includes assessment of training, research engagement, and logistical burden which needs to be triaged differently for early and late-stage clinical trials. Additional considerations include sharing trial results with study participants and leveraging publicly available data for compliance modeling. To the best of our knowledge, this report provides holistic considerations for sensor-based DHT implementation that may optimize participant compliance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"17 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70054","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increased use of sensor-based digital health technologies (DHTs) in clinical trials brought to light concerns about implementation practices that might introduce burden on trial participants, resulting in suboptimal compliance and become an additional complicating factor in clinical trial conduct. These concerns may contribute to the lower-than-anticipated uptake of DHT deployment and data use for regulatory decision-making, despite well-articulated benefits. The Electronic Clinical Outcome Assessment (eCOA) Consortium gathered collective experience on deploying sensor-based DHTs and supplemented this with relevant literature focusing on mechanisms that may enhance participant compliance. The process for DHT implementation starts with identifying a clinical concept of interest followed by a digital measure selection, defining active or passive data capture and their sources, the number of sensors with respective body location, plus the duration and frequency of use in the context of perceived participant burden. Roundtable discussions among patient groups, physicians, and technology providers prior to protocol development can be very impactful for optimizing trial design. While diversity and inclusion are essential for any clinical trial, patient populations should be considered carefully in the context of trial-specific aims, requirements, and anticipated patient burden. Minimizing site burden includes assessment of training, research engagement, and logistical burden which needs to be triaged differently for early and late-stage clinical trials. Additional considerations include sharing trial results with study participants and leveraging publicly available data for compliance modeling. To the best of our knowledge, this report provides holistic considerations for sensor-based DHT implementation that may optimize participant compliance.

Abstract Image

在临床试验中实施基于传感器的数字健康技术:eCOA 联盟的主要考虑因素。
在临床试验中越来越多地使用基于传感器的数字健康技术(DHTs),这引起了人们对实施方法的关注,因为实施方法可能会给试验参与者带来负担,导致他们不能很好地遵守规定,成为临床试验过程中的另一个复杂因素。这些顾虑可能会导致在监管决策中部署 DHT 和使用数据的比例低于预期,尽管其好处已得到充分说明。电子临床结果评估(eCOA)联盟收集了部署基于传感器的 DHT 的集体经验,并补充了相关文献,重点关注可提高参与者依从性的机制。DHT 的实施过程首先是确定感兴趣的临床概念,然后选择数字测量方法,确定主动或被动数据采集及其来源、传感器数量及其各自的身体位置,以及在参与者感觉到的负担范围内的使用时间和频率。在制定方案之前,患者团体、医生和技术提供商之间的圆桌讨论对优化试验设计非常有帮助。虽然多样性和包容性对任何临床试验都至关重要,但应根据特定试验的目的、要求和预期患者负担仔细考虑患者群体。尽量减轻研究机构的负担包括对培训、研究参与和后勤负担的评估,这需要对早期和晚期临床试验进行不同的分流。其他考虑因素还包括与研究参与者共享试验结果,以及利用公开数据建立符合性模型。据我们所知,本报告为基于传感器的 DHT 的实施提供了全面的考虑因素,可优化参与者的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信