Correlation between severity of preoperative low back pain and postoperative outcomes in lumbar disc herniation surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Koji Nakajima, Junya Miyahara, Hideki Nakamoto, So Kato, Yuki Taniguchi, Yoshitaka Matsubayashi, Naohiro Kawamura, Akiro Higashikawa, Yujiro Takeshita, Masayoshi Fukushima, Takashi Ono, Nobuhiro Hara, Naoki Okamoto, Sakae Tanaka, Yasushi Oshima
{"title":"Correlation between severity of preoperative low back pain and postoperative outcomes in lumbar disc herniation surgery: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Koji Nakajima, Junya Miyahara, Hideki Nakamoto, So Kato, Yuki Taniguchi, Yoshitaka Matsubayashi, Naohiro Kawamura, Akiro Higashikawa, Yujiro Takeshita, Masayoshi Fukushima, Takashi Ono, Nobuhiro Hara, Naoki Okamoto, Sakae Tanaka, Yasushi Oshima","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background context: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) frequently occurs in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH), however the extent to which discectomy ameliorates it and how preoperative LBP influences postoperative outcomes remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the improvement in LBP and its impact on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).</p><p><strong>Study design/setting: </strong>Multicenter retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Patient sample: </strong>Patients undergoing discectomy for LDH at 8 hospitals from April 2017 to March 2021.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Data were collected on patients' backgrounds, operative factors, and PROMs, including the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain in the low back, buttock, or leg, EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and postoperative satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were categorized into mild (NRS 0-3), moderate (NRS 4-7), or severe (NRS 8-10) LBP groups. Inverse probability weighting with propensity scores was used to adjust for demographic and clinical differences between groups. Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were conducted to compare background data and clinical characteristics. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for less than 50% improvement in LBP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 928 patients: 270 mild, 343 moderate, and 315 severe. After adjustment, preoperative NRS scores were significantly different across groups, with scores of 1.6 (SD 1.3), 5.6 (SD 1.0), and 8.8 (SD 0.9), respectively. Postoperative NRS scores also varied significantly, with worse outcomes observed in the severe group compared to the mild group, yet similar to the moderate group. A total of 46.8% of the mild group, 86.6% of the moderate group, and 72.9% of the severe group achieved a 50% decrease in NRS scores of LBP. Preoperative EQ-5D and ODI scores were significantly worse in the severe group compared to the mild or moderate groups, but postoperative scores were not significantly different between the severe and moderate groups. No significant differences in postoperative satisfaction were observed among the groups. Being female was a significant risk factor for less than 50% improvement in LBP (odds ratio = 1.56, p=.022).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Discectomy significantly improved LBP in patients with LDH, including those with moderate or severe LBP. Patients with severe LBP showed similar improvements in PROMs as those with moderate LBP. Female gender emerged as a significant risk factor for less than optimal improvement in LBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":49484,"journal":{"name":"Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2024.10.022","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background context: Low back pain (LBP) frequently occurs in patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH), however the extent to which discectomy ameliorates it and how preoperative LBP influences postoperative outcomes remains unclear.

Purpose: To evaluate the improvement in LBP and its impact on postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

Study design/setting: Multicenter retrospective observational study.

Patient sample: Patients undergoing discectomy for LDH at 8 hospitals from April 2017 to March 2021.

Outcome measures: Data were collected on patients' backgrounds, operative factors, and PROMs, including the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain in the low back, buttock, or leg, EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, and postoperative satisfaction.

Methods: Patients were categorized into mild (NRS 0-3), moderate (NRS 4-7), or severe (NRS 8-10) LBP groups. Inverse probability weighting with propensity scores was used to adjust for demographic and clinical differences between groups. Chi-square tests and one-way analysis of variance were conducted to compare background data and clinical characteristics. Additionally, multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for less than 50% improvement in LBP.

Results: This study included 928 patients: 270 mild, 343 moderate, and 315 severe. After adjustment, preoperative NRS scores were significantly different across groups, with scores of 1.6 (SD 1.3), 5.6 (SD 1.0), and 8.8 (SD 0.9), respectively. Postoperative NRS scores also varied significantly, with worse outcomes observed in the severe group compared to the mild group, yet similar to the moderate group. A total of 46.8% of the mild group, 86.6% of the moderate group, and 72.9% of the severe group achieved a 50% decrease in NRS scores of LBP. Preoperative EQ-5D and ODI scores were significantly worse in the severe group compared to the mild or moderate groups, but postoperative scores were not significantly different between the severe and moderate groups. No significant differences in postoperative satisfaction were observed among the groups. Being female was a significant risk factor for less than 50% improvement in LBP (odds ratio = 1.56, p=.022).

Conclusions: Discectomy significantly improved LBP in patients with LDH, including those with moderate or severe LBP. Patients with severe LBP showed similar improvements in PROMs as those with moderate LBP. Female gender emerged as a significant risk factor for less than optimal improvement in LBP.

腰椎间盘突出症手术术前腰痛严重程度与术后效果之间的相关性:回顾性队列研究。
背景情况:腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者经常出现腰背痛(LBP),但椎间盘切除术对腰背痛的改善程度以及术前LBP对术后结果的影响仍不清楚:多中心回顾性观察研究:2017年4月至2021年3月在8家医院接受LDH椎间盘切除术的患者.结果测量:收集患者背景、手术因素和PROMs数据,包括腰部、臀部或腿部疼痛的数字评分量表(NRS)、EQ-5D(EuroQol 5 Dimension)、Oswestry残疾指数(ODI)评分和术后满意度:将患者分为轻度(NRS 0-3)、中度(NRS 4-7)和重度(NRS 8-10)LBP 组。使用反概率加权和倾向分数来调整组间的人口统计学和临床差异。对背景数据和临床特征进行了卡方检验和单因素方差分析。此外,还进行了多变量逻辑回归,以确定肺结核改善率低于 50%的风险因素:本研究共纳入 928 名患者:结果:该研究纳入了 928 名患者:270 名轻度患者、343 名中度患者和 315 名重度患者。经调整后,各组患者术前的 NRS 评分差异显著,分别为 1.6(标清 1.3)、5.6(标清 1.0)和 8.8(标清 0.9)分。术后 NRS 评分也有显著差异,重度组的疗效比轻度组差,但与中度组相似。轻度组中有 46.8%、中度组中有 86.6%、重度组中有 72.9% 的人 LBP NRS 评分下降了 50%。与轻度组或中度组相比,重度组的术前 EQ-5D 和 ODI 评分明显较差,但术后评分在重度组和中度组之间无明显差异。各组间的术后满意度无明显差异。女性是椎间盘突出症改善率低于50%的重要风险因素(几率比=1.56,P=0.022):结论:椎间盘切除术能明显改善 LDH 患者的 LBP,包括中度或重度 LBP 患者。重度LBP患者的PROMs改善情况与中度LBP患者相似。女性性别是导致LBP改善效果不理想的一个重要风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine Journal
Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
680
审稿时长
13.1 weeks
期刊介绍: The Spine Journal, the official journal of the North American Spine Society, is an international and multidisciplinary journal that publishes original, peer-reviewed articles on research and treatment related to the spine and spine care, including basic science and clinical investigations. It is a condition of publication that manuscripts submitted to The Spine Journal have not been published, and will not be simultaneously submitted or published elsewhere. The Spine Journal also publishes major reviews of specific topics by acknowledged authorities, technical notes, teaching editorials, and other special features, Letters to the Editor-in-Chief are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信