Letizia M Jannello, Mario DE Angelis, Carolin Siech, Francesco DI Bello, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, Zhe Tian, Jordan A Goyal, Stefano Luzzago, Francesco A Mistretta, Marco Tozzi, Fred Saad, Felix K Chun, Alberto Briganti, Stefano Puliatti, Nicola Longo, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Gennaro Musi, Pierre I Karakiewicz
{"title":"Validation of lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of lymph-node invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.","authors":"Letizia M Jannello, Mario DE Angelis, Carolin Siech, Francesco DI Bello, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, Zhe Tian, Jordan A Goyal, Stefano Luzzago, Francesco A Mistretta, Marco Tozzi, Fred Saad, Felix K Chun, Alberto Briganti, Stefano Puliatti, Nicola Longo, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Gennaro Musi, Pierre I Karakiewicz","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05938-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate lymphovascular invasion (LVI) as a predictor of lymph-node invasion (LNI) in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2020), we identified SCCP patients who underwent lymphadenectomy with known LVI status. Univariable logistic regression models (LRMs) addressed LNI. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) quantified accuracy after 2000 bootstrap resamples for internal validation. Multivariable LRMs included the most informative, statistically significant predictors. Subgroup analyses were repeated in organ-confined (T1b-T2) and non-organ confined (T3-T4) stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 586 SCCP patients, 219 (37%) had LVI. LVI was associated with higher rate of LNI (66 vs. 43%; P<0.001). Positive predictive value of LVI was 66 vs. 57% for negative predictive value. In multivariable LRMs, LVI independently predicted LNI (Odds ratio [OR]: 2.41; P<0.001). Bootstrap-adjusted c-index of multivariable model was 0.570 without LVI vs. 0.639 with LVI. In subgroup analyses, LVI independently predicted LNI in organ-confined (OR: 2.23; P<0.001) and in non-organ confined stages (OR: 3.10; P<0.001). In subgroup analyses, addition of LVI increased c-index from 0.530 to 0.595 in organ-confined and from 0.599 to 0.682 in non-organ confined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study validates LVI as an independent predictor of LNI in SCCP. LVI increases the accuracy of LNI predictions in the overall cohort as well as in organ-confined and non-organ confined stages. However, stage and grade even with the added consideration of LVI are not accurate enough to provide LNI prediction in individual patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05938-X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to validate lymphovascular invasion (LVI) as a predictor of lymph-node invasion (LNI) in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP).
Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2020), we identified SCCP patients who underwent lymphadenectomy with known LVI status. Univariable logistic regression models (LRMs) addressed LNI. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) quantified accuracy after 2000 bootstrap resamples for internal validation. Multivariable LRMs included the most informative, statistically significant predictors. Subgroup analyses were repeated in organ-confined (T1b-T2) and non-organ confined (T3-T4) stages.
Results: Of 586 SCCP patients, 219 (37%) had LVI. LVI was associated with higher rate of LNI (66 vs. 43%; P<0.001). Positive predictive value of LVI was 66 vs. 57% for negative predictive value. In multivariable LRMs, LVI independently predicted LNI (Odds ratio [OR]: 2.41; P<0.001). Bootstrap-adjusted c-index of multivariable model was 0.570 without LVI vs. 0.639 with LVI. In subgroup analyses, LVI independently predicted LNI in organ-confined (OR: 2.23; P<0.001) and in non-organ confined stages (OR: 3.10; P<0.001). In subgroup analyses, addition of LVI increased c-index from 0.530 to 0.595 in organ-confined and from 0.599 to 0.682 in non-organ confined.
Conclusions: The current study validates LVI as an independent predictor of LNI in SCCP. LVI increases the accuracy of LNI predictions in the overall cohort as well as in organ-confined and non-organ confined stages. However, stage and grade even with the added consideration of LVI are not accurate enough to provide LNI prediction in individual patients.