Validation of lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of lymph-node invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Letizia M Jannello, Mario DE Angelis, Carolin Siech, Francesco DI Bello, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, Zhe Tian, Jordan A Goyal, Stefano Luzzago, Francesco A Mistretta, Marco Tozzi, Fred Saad, Felix K Chun, Alberto Briganti, Stefano Puliatti, Nicola Longo, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Gennaro Musi, Pierre I Karakiewicz
{"title":"Validation of lymphovascular invasion as a predictor of lymph-node invasion in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis.","authors":"Letizia M Jannello, Mario DE Angelis, Carolin Siech, Francesco DI Bello, Natali Rodriguez Peñaranda, Zhe Tian, Jordan A Goyal, Stefano Luzzago, Francesco A Mistretta, Marco Tozzi, Fred Saad, Felix K Chun, Alberto Briganti, Stefano Puliatti, Nicola Longo, Ottavio DE Cobelli, Gennaro Musi, Pierre I Karakiewicz","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05938-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate lymphovascular invasion (LVI) as a predictor of lymph-node invasion (LNI) in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2020), we identified SCCP patients who underwent lymphadenectomy with known LVI status. Univariable logistic regression models (LRMs) addressed LNI. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) quantified accuracy after 2000 bootstrap resamples for internal validation. Multivariable LRMs included the most informative, statistically significant predictors. Subgroup analyses were repeated in organ-confined (T1b-T2) and non-organ confined (T3-T4) stages.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 586 SCCP patients, 219 (37%) had LVI. LVI was associated with higher rate of LNI (66 vs. 43%; P<0.001). Positive predictive value of LVI was 66 vs. 57% for negative predictive value. In multivariable LRMs, LVI independently predicted LNI (Odds ratio [OR]: 2.41; P<0.001). Bootstrap-adjusted c-index of multivariable model was 0.570 without LVI vs. 0.639 with LVI. In subgroup analyses, LVI independently predicted LNI in organ-confined (OR: 2.23; P<0.001) and in non-organ confined stages (OR: 3.10; P<0.001). In subgroup analyses, addition of LVI increased c-index from 0.530 to 0.595 in organ-confined and from 0.599 to 0.682 in non-organ confined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The current study validates LVI as an independent predictor of LNI in SCCP. LVI increases the accuracy of LNI predictions in the overall cohort as well as in organ-confined and non-organ confined stages. However, stage and grade even with the added consideration of LVI are not accurate enough to provide LNI prediction in individual patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":53228,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05938-X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to validate lymphovascular invasion (LVI) as a predictor of lymph-node invasion (LNI) in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP).

Methods: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2020), we identified SCCP patients who underwent lymphadenectomy with known LVI status. Univariable logistic regression models (LRMs) addressed LNI. Harrell's concordance index (c-index) quantified accuracy after 2000 bootstrap resamples for internal validation. Multivariable LRMs included the most informative, statistically significant predictors. Subgroup analyses were repeated in organ-confined (T1b-T2) and non-organ confined (T3-T4) stages.

Results: Of 586 SCCP patients, 219 (37%) had LVI. LVI was associated with higher rate of LNI (66 vs. 43%; P<0.001). Positive predictive value of LVI was 66 vs. 57% for negative predictive value. In multivariable LRMs, LVI independently predicted LNI (Odds ratio [OR]: 2.41; P<0.001). Bootstrap-adjusted c-index of multivariable model was 0.570 without LVI vs. 0.639 with LVI. In subgroup analyses, LVI independently predicted LNI in organ-confined (OR: 2.23; P<0.001) and in non-organ confined stages (OR: 3.10; P<0.001). In subgroup analyses, addition of LVI increased c-index from 0.530 to 0.595 in organ-confined and from 0.599 to 0.682 in non-organ confined.

Conclusions: The current study validates LVI as an independent predictor of LNI in SCCP. LVI increases the accuracy of LNI predictions in the overall cohort as well as in organ-confined and non-organ confined stages. However, stage and grade even with the added consideration of LVI are not accurate enough to provide LNI prediction in individual patients.

将淋巴管侵犯作为阴茎鳞状细胞癌淋巴结侵犯的预测指标进行验证。
背景:本研究旨在验证淋巴管侵犯(LVI)可作为阴茎鳞状细胞癌(SCCP)淋巴结侵犯(LNI)的预测指标:在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库(2010-2020 年)中,我们确定了接受淋巴结切除术且已知 LVI 状态的 SCCP 患者。单变量逻辑回归模型(LRM)处理 LNI。经过 2000 次引导重采样进行内部验证后,哈雷尔一致性指数(c-index)对准确性进行了量化。多变量 LRM 包括信息量最大、统计意义最显著的预测因子。在器官局限期(T1b-T2)和非器官局限期(T3-T4)重复进行了亚组分析:在 586 名 SCCP 患者中,219 人(37%)患有 LVI。LVI与较高的LNI率相关(66%对43%;PC结论:本研究证实 LVI 是 SCCP LNI 的独立预测指标。LVI 提高了整体队列以及器官局限期和非器官局限期 LNI 预测的准确性。但是,即使考虑到 LVI,分期和分级也不足以准确预测单个患者的 LNI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Urology and Nephrology
Minerva Urology and Nephrology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
32.70%
发文量
237
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信