Predictors of Successful Tobacco Cessation After Receiving an E-Cigarette Based Smoking Cessation Intervention.

IF 2.1 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tobacco Use Insights Pub Date : 2024-10-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/1179173X241283470
Ian Pope, Allan Clark, Lucy Clark, Emma Ward, Susan Stirling, Pippa Belderson, Caitlin Notley
{"title":"Predictors of Successful Tobacco Cessation After Receiving an E-Cigarette Based Smoking Cessation Intervention.","authors":"Ian Pope, Allan Clark, Lucy Clark, Emma Ward, Susan Stirling, Pippa Belderson, Caitlin Notley","doi":"10.1177/1179173X241283470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>E-cigarettes have been shown to be effective for tobacco smoking cessation. Predicting those who are most likely to achieve smoking abstinence after receiving an e-cigarette based smoking cessation intervention could help to target interventions more efficiently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A secondary analysis of baseline characteristics of 505 people who received an emergency department based smoking cessation intervention incorporating brief advice, provision of an e-cigarette starter kit and referral to stop smoking services. Gender, ethnicity, age, employment status, deprivation, partner smoking status, cigarettes per day, motivation to quit, cigarette dependence and previous e-cigarette use were assessed as predictors of abstinence. Self-reported smoking status was collected 6 months after intervention delivery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 6 months 169/505 (33%) of those who received the intervention self-reported abstinence. The groups that were more likely to report having quit were females (37.4% of females vs 31.0% of males), older people (41.1% of over 50s vs 33.3% of under 35s), lighter smokers (36.4% of those who smoked less than 10 cigarettes per day vs 30.7% for those who smoked over 20) and more motivated quitters (35.6% for those with high motivation vs 29.2% for those with low motivation). However, in multiple logistic regression, when adjusting for the other factors, no factors significantly predicted smoking abstinence. Degree of nicotine dependence was very similar between those who quit and those who did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study found no baseline factors that could predict successful smoking cessation with e-cigarettes. Consequently, this study does not support the use of a targeted e-cigarette-based smoking cessation intervention, suggesting the adoption of a more universal approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":43361,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Use Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528681/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Use Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1179173X241283470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: E-cigarettes have been shown to be effective for tobacco smoking cessation. Predicting those who are most likely to achieve smoking abstinence after receiving an e-cigarette based smoking cessation intervention could help to target interventions more efficiently.

Methods: A secondary analysis of baseline characteristics of 505 people who received an emergency department based smoking cessation intervention incorporating brief advice, provision of an e-cigarette starter kit and referral to stop smoking services. Gender, ethnicity, age, employment status, deprivation, partner smoking status, cigarettes per day, motivation to quit, cigarette dependence and previous e-cigarette use were assessed as predictors of abstinence. Self-reported smoking status was collected 6 months after intervention delivery.

Results: At 6 months 169/505 (33%) of those who received the intervention self-reported abstinence. The groups that were more likely to report having quit were females (37.4% of females vs 31.0% of males), older people (41.1% of over 50s vs 33.3% of under 35s), lighter smokers (36.4% of those who smoked less than 10 cigarettes per day vs 30.7% for those who smoked over 20) and more motivated quitters (35.6% for those with high motivation vs 29.2% for those with low motivation). However, in multiple logistic regression, when adjusting for the other factors, no factors significantly predicted smoking abstinence. Degree of nicotine dependence was very similar between those who quit and those who did not.

Conclusion: The study found no baseline factors that could predict successful smoking cessation with e-cigarettes. Consequently, this study does not support the use of a targeted e-cigarette-based smoking cessation intervention, suggesting the adoption of a more universal approach.

接受电子烟戒烟干预后成功戒烟的预测因素。
介绍:电子烟已被证明对戒烟有效。预测接受电子烟戒烟干预后最有可能戒烟的人群有助于更有效地确定干预目标:方法:对接受急诊科戒烟干预的 505 名患者的基线特征进行二次分析,包括简短建议、提供电子烟启动包和转诊至戒烟服务机构。性别、种族、年龄、就业状况、贫困程度、伴侣吸烟状况、每天吸烟支数、戒烟动机、香烟依赖性和以前使用电子烟的情况被评估为戒烟的预测因素。干预实施6个月后,收集自我报告的吸烟状况:6个月后,169/505(33%)名接受干预的人自我报告戒烟。更有可能报告已戒烟的群体是女性(女性为 37.4%,男性为 31.0%)、老年人(50 岁以上为 41.1%,35 岁以下为 33.3%)、烟量较少的吸烟者(每天吸烟少于 10 支的吸烟者为 36.4%,吸烟超过 20 支的吸烟者为 30.7%)和戒烟动机较强的吸烟者(戒烟动机强的吸烟者为 35.6%,戒烟动机弱的吸烟者为 29.2%)。然而,在多元逻辑回归中,当调整了其他因素后,没有任何因素能显著预测戒烟率。戒烟者与未戒烟者的尼古丁依赖程度非常相似:该研究没有发现任何基线因素可以预测使用电子烟成功戒烟。因此,本研究不支持使用有针对性的电子烟戒烟干预,建议采用更普遍的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tobacco Use Insights
Tobacco Use Insights PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信