Nurses' Perception on the Hindrances of Triage System in Emergency Unit.

IF 2.2 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/8621065
Olunike Blessing Olofinbiyi, Lufuno Makhado
{"title":"Nurses' Perception on the Hindrances of Triage System in Emergency Unit.","authors":"Olunike Blessing Olofinbiyi, Lufuno Makhado","doi":"10.1155/2024/8621065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Despite the fact that several triage tools have been implemented globally, emergency care, including the triage system, is often one of the weakest parts of the health system in developing countries, as compared to developed countries. Moreover, emergency centers in African countries are very busy, often flooded by high load of trauma patients, chronic medical conditions, acute medical emergencies, and HIV-related conditions. These disease conditions precipitate the reasons for the prioritization of patients. In South Africa, studies conducted on the use of triage by nurses revealed that most patients are satisfied with the Nurse-led triage service provided in emergency departments (EDs). At the same time, some Nurses also see the South African Triage Scale (SATS) as one of the easiest Nurse-led triage tools. <b>Aim:</b> The study aimed at identifying the factors hindering the effective process of triage during care provision at a selected public hospital in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN). <b>Methods:</b> This study utilized a cross-sectional survey, employing a nonprobability convenience sampling to recruit its respondents. The recognition primed decision model formed the framework of the study. Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of KwaZulu-Natal Ethics Review Board, and ethics principles were carefully observed throughout the study. <b>Results:</b> Out of the 100 respondents, 89% (89) of the respondents perceived that various factors still impede the progress of triage, while 11% (11) of the respondents perceived that no factor impedes the progress of triage. <b>Conclusion:</b> The study indicates that several factors still hinder the effective process of triage. Based on the findings of the study, factors like overcrowding, Nurses waiting for doctors when they know what to do, lack of continuous professional development on triage system, inadequate experience, lack of confidence, and lack of adequate training on triage still impede the efficient triage system.</p>","PeriodicalId":46917,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Research and Practice","volume":"2024 ","pages":"8621065"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/8621065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the fact that several triage tools have been implemented globally, emergency care, including the triage system, is often one of the weakest parts of the health system in developing countries, as compared to developed countries. Moreover, emergency centers in African countries are very busy, often flooded by high load of trauma patients, chronic medical conditions, acute medical emergencies, and HIV-related conditions. These disease conditions precipitate the reasons for the prioritization of patients. In South Africa, studies conducted on the use of triage by nurses revealed that most patients are satisfied with the Nurse-led triage service provided in emergency departments (EDs). At the same time, some Nurses also see the South African Triage Scale (SATS) as one of the easiest Nurse-led triage tools. Aim: The study aimed at identifying the factors hindering the effective process of triage during care provision at a selected public hospital in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN). Methods: This study utilized a cross-sectional survey, employing a nonprobability convenience sampling to recruit its respondents. The recognition primed decision model formed the framework of the study. Ethical clearance was obtained from the University of KwaZulu-Natal Ethics Review Board, and ethics principles were carefully observed throughout the study. Results: Out of the 100 respondents, 89% (89) of the respondents perceived that various factors still impede the progress of triage, while 11% (11) of the respondents perceived that no factor impedes the progress of triage. Conclusion: The study indicates that several factors still hinder the effective process of triage. Based on the findings of the study, factors like overcrowding, Nurses waiting for doctors when they know what to do, lack of continuous professional development on triage system, inadequate experience, lack of confidence, and lack of adequate training on triage still impede the efficient triage system.

护士对急诊室分诊系统阻碍因素的看法。
背景:尽管全球范围内已经实施了多种分流工具,但与发达国家相比,发展中国家的医疗系统中包括分流系统在内的急救护理往往是最薄弱的部分之一。此外,非洲国家的急救中心非常繁忙,经常有大量的外伤病人、慢性病人、急诊病人和艾滋病毒相关病人涌入。这些疾病状况都是病人优先就诊的原因。在南非,对护士分诊使用情况的研究表明,大多数患者对急诊科(ED)提供的由护士主导的分诊服务感到满意。同时,一些护士还将南非分诊量表(SATS)视为最简单的护士主导分诊工具之一。目的:该研究旨在确定在夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省(KZN)一家选定的公立医院提供护理服务期间阻碍有效分诊过程的因素。研究方法本研究采用横断面调查,通过非概率便利抽样来招募受访者。识别引导决策模型构成了本研究的框架。研究获得了夸祖鲁-纳塔尔大学伦理审查委员会的伦理许可,并在整个研究过程中认真遵守了伦理原则。研究结果在 100 名受访者中,89%(89 人)的受访者认为各种因素仍在阻碍分诊工作的进展,而 11%(11 人)的受访者认为没有任何因素阻碍分诊工作的进展。结论研究表明,多种因素仍然阻碍着分流工作的有效进行。根据研究结果,人满为患、护士在知道该做什么的情况下等待医生、分诊系统缺乏持续的专业发展、经验不足、缺乏信心以及缺乏足够的分诊培训等因素仍然阻碍着有效的分诊系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信