Durvalumab Following Chemoradiotherapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Differences in Survival Based on Age and Post-Progression Systemic Therapy.

IF 4.4 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Doran Ksienski, Pauline T Truong, Jeffrey N Bone, Sarah Egli, Melissa Clarkson, Tiffany Patterson, Mary Lesperance, Suganija Lakkunarajah
{"title":"Durvalumab Following Chemoradiotherapy for Stage III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Differences in Survival Based on Age and Post-Progression Systemic Therapy.","authors":"Doran Ksienski, Pauline T Truong, Jeffrey N Bone, Sarah Egli, Melissa Clarkson, Tiffany Patterson, Mary Lesperance, Suganija Lakkunarajah","doi":"10.1007/s11523-024-01111-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by 1 year of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) durvalumab is standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival outcomes of (1) cCRT followed by durvalumab in patients older versus younger than 75 years of age and (2) post-progression treatment with ICI alone versus chemotherapy alone versus combined ICI and chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated between January 2018 and July 2023 with cCRT followed by durvalumab were identified retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from ICI start were analyzed in three cohorts aged < 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression modelling of factors associated with OS was undertaken. Logistic regression analysis identified risk factors of early durvalumab discontinuation for toxicity. Time from first salvage drug treatment to death (OS-2) was described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 472 patients were analyzed: the proportions aged < 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years were 34.3%, 42.8%, and 22.9%, respectively. Odds of early durvalumab discontinuation was 2.2-fold greater in the oldest (versus youngest) cohort. Age associated differences in median PFS (26.7 months, 20.3 months, and 14.2 months; p < 0.001) and OS (60.8 months, 44.4 months, and 27.6 months; p < 0.001) were observed. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with shorter OS were age ≥ 75 years (versus < 65), performance status 2/3 (versus 0/1), stage IIIC (versus IIIA), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (per 7.43 unit increase), Charlson comorbidity index (per 1 unit increase), tumoral PD-L1 expression < 1% (versus ≥ 50%, 1-49%, or unknown), and squamous histology (versus non-squamous). Of 264 patients with disease progression, 48.5% received subsequent drug therapy. Median OS-2 was longer with ICI alone (9.9 months) or ICI-chemotherapy (11.8 months) than platinum doublet chemotherapy (6.7 months.) For recurrences < 6 months from the last durvalumab infusion, OS-2 were similar across treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the studied cohort, OS was significantly shorter for patients ≥ 75 years of age treated with cCRT followed by durvalumab compared to those < 65 years. Post-progression systemic therapy was associated with modest efficacy, underscoring the need for new therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22195,"journal":{"name":"Targeted Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Targeted Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-024-01111-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by 1 year of the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) durvalumab is standard of care for patients with unresectable stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate survival outcomes of (1) cCRT followed by durvalumab in patients older versus younger than 75 years of age and (2) post-progression treatment with ICI alone versus chemotherapy alone versus combined ICI and chemotherapy.

Patients and methods: Patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC treated between January 2018 and July 2023 with cCRT followed by durvalumab were identified retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) from ICI start were analyzed in three cohorts aged < 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression modelling of factors associated with OS was undertaken. Logistic regression analysis identified risk factors of early durvalumab discontinuation for toxicity. Time from first salvage drug treatment to death (OS-2) was described.

Results: A total of 472 patients were analyzed: the proportions aged < 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years were 34.3%, 42.8%, and 22.9%, respectively. Odds of early durvalumab discontinuation was 2.2-fold greater in the oldest (versus youngest) cohort. Age associated differences in median PFS (26.7 months, 20.3 months, and 14.2 months; p < 0.001) and OS (60.8 months, 44.4 months, and 27.6 months; p < 0.001) were observed. On multivariable analysis, factors associated with shorter OS were age ≥ 75 years (versus < 65), performance status 2/3 (versus 0/1), stage IIIC (versus IIIA), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (per 7.43 unit increase), Charlson comorbidity index (per 1 unit increase), tumoral PD-L1 expression < 1% (versus ≥ 50%, 1-49%, or unknown), and squamous histology (versus non-squamous). Of 264 patients with disease progression, 48.5% received subsequent drug therapy. Median OS-2 was longer with ICI alone (9.9 months) or ICI-chemotherapy (11.8 months) than platinum doublet chemotherapy (6.7 months.) For recurrences < 6 months from the last durvalumab infusion, OS-2 were similar across treatment groups.

Conclusions: In the studied cohort, OS was significantly shorter for patients ≥ 75 years of age treated with cCRT followed by durvalumab compared to those < 65 years. Post-progression systemic therapy was associated with modest efficacy, underscoring the need for new therapies.

化放疗治疗 III 期非小细胞肺癌后使用 Durvalumab:基于年龄和进展后系统治疗的生存率差异
背景:对于无法切除的III期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者,标准治疗方法是先进行同步放化疗(cCRT),然后使用免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)durvalumab治疗1年:本研究的目的是评估:(1) 年龄大于75岁与小于75岁的患者在接受cCRT治疗后使用durvalumab的生存结果;(2) 仅使用ICI与仅使用化疗与联合使用ICI和化疗进行进展后治疗的生存结果:回顾性鉴定了2018年1月至2023年7月期间接受cCRT治疗后再接受durvalumab治疗的不可切除的III期NSCLC患者。在年龄小于65岁、65-74岁和≥75岁的三个队列中分析了从ICI开始的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。对与 OS 相关的因素进行了多变量 Cox 比例危险回归建模。逻辑回归分析确定了早期因毒性停用杜伐单抗的风险因素。对首次挽救性药物治疗到死亡的时间(OS-2)进行了描述:共分析了472例患者:年龄小于65岁、65-74岁和大于75岁的患者比例分别为34.3%、42.8%和22.9%。年龄最大(相对于年龄最小)的患者早期停用杜伐单抗的几率是年龄最小患者的2.2倍。观察到中位 PFS(26.7 个月、20.3 个月和 14.2 个月;p < 0.001)和 OS(60.8 个月、44.4 个月和 27.6 个月;p < 0.001)与年龄相关的差异。多变量分析显示,与较短的OS相关的因素有:年龄≥75岁(相对于<65岁)、表现状态2/3(相对于0/1)、IIIC期(相对于IIIA期)、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(每增加7.43个单位)、Charlson合并症指数(每增加1个单位)、肿瘤PD-L1表达<1%(相对于≥50%、1-49%或未知)以及鳞状组织学(相对于非鳞状组织学)。在264例疾病进展的患者中,48.5%接受了后续药物治疗。单用ICI(9.9个月)或ICI-化疗(11.8个月)的中位OS-2长于铂类双药化疗(6.7个月)。对于距最后一次输注durvalumab不足6个月的复发,各治疗组的OS-2相似:在所研究的队列中,与年龄小于65岁的患者相比,年龄≥75岁的患者在接受cCRT治疗后再接受durvalumab治疗,其OS明显较短。进展后系统治疗的疗效一般,这说明需要新的疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Targeted Oncology
Targeted Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
64
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Targeted Oncology addresses physicians and scientists committed to oncology and cancer research by providing a programme of articles on molecularly targeted pharmacotherapy in oncology. The journal includes: Original Research Articles on all aspects of molecularly targeted agents for the treatment of cancer, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and related approaches. Comprehensive narrative Review Articles and shorter Leading Articles discussing relevant clinically established as well as emerging agents and pathways. Current Opinion articles that place interesting areas in perspective. Therapy in Practice articles that provide a guide to the optimum management of a condition and highlight practical, clinically relevant considerations and recommendations. Systematic Reviews that use explicit, systematic methods as outlined by the PRISMA statement. Adis Drug Reviews of the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established targeted drugs in oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信