{"title":"MCL pie crusting for concomitant medial meniscal surgery does not appear to adversely influence primary ACL reconstruction functional outcomes.","authors":"Ayman Gabr, James Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medial collateral ligament \"pie-crusting\" (MCLPC), selective release of the superficial MCL, has been shown to improve the arthroscopic access to the posterior horn of the medial meniscus without adversely affecting the outcomes of isolated meniscal surgery. However, whether MCL PC, to address concomitant meniscal lesions during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery, adversely affects ACLR outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether patients who had undergone MCLPC at the time of ACLR had similar post outcomes to patients undergoing isolated ACLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>55 consecutive patients (33 male and 22 female), with minimum 2-year follow-up, who had undergone MCLPC with concomitant primary ACLR (PC group) were retrospectively matched on the basis of age, sex and follow-up with 55 patients who underwent isolated primary ACLR. Post-operative outcome measures (PROMs) included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner activity score, the EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire and EuroQol visual analogue scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups' median postoperative EQ 5D-VAS, EQ 5D-index and Tegner scores were similar. The difference between pre-operative and post-operative KOOS scores was similar for the two group for all subscales except the ADL subscale which was higher in the MCLPC group (24, IQR= 6-32) than in the isolated ACLR group (5, IQR= 0-9.74). The median post op IKDC score was 84 in the MCLPC group and compared with 90 in the isolated ACLR group. However, the difference between pre-operative and post-operative IKDC scores was higher in patients in the MCLPC group (40, IQR= 25-49) than in the isolated ACLR group (32, IQR=19.6-46.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCLPC, performed at the time of ACLR does not appear to adversely affect the functional post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Medial collateral ligament "pie-crusting" (MCLPC), selective release of the superficial MCL, has been shown to improve the arthroscopic access to the posterior horn of the medial meniscus without adversely affecting the outcomes of isolated meniscal surgery. However, whether MCL PC, to address concomitant meniscal lesions during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery, adversely affects ACLR outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether patients who had undergone MCLPC at the time of ACLR had similar post outcomes to patients undergoing isolated ACLR.
Methods: 55 consecutive patients (33 male and 22 female), with minimum 2-year follow-up, who had undergone MCLPC with concomitant primary ACLR (PC group) were retrospectively matched on the basis of age, sex and follow-up with 55 patients who underwent isolated primary ACLR. Post-operative outcome measures (PROMs) included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner activity score, the EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire and EuroQol visual analogue scale.
Results: The two groups' median postoperative EQ 5D-VAS, EQ 5D-index and Tegner scores were similar. The difference between pre-operative and post-operative KOOS scores was similar for the two group for all subscales except the ADL subscale which was higher in the MCLPC group (24, IQR= 6-32) than in the isolated ACLR group (5, IQR= 0-9.74). The median post op IKDC score was 84 in the MCLPC group and compared with 90 in the isolated ACLR group. However, the difference between pre-operative and post-operative IKDC scores was higher in patients in the MCLPC group (40, IQR= 25-49) than in the isolated ACLR group (32, IQR=19.6-46.8).
Conclusions: MCLPC, performed at the time of ACLR does not appear to adversely affect the functional post-operative outcomes.