MCL pie crusting for concomitant medial meniscal surgery does not appear to adversely influence primary ACL reconstruction functional outcomes.

IF 2.7 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ayman Gabr, James Robinson
{"title":"MCL pie crusting for concomitant medial meniscal surgery does not appear to adversely influence primary ACL reconstruction functional outcomes.","authors":"Ayman Gabr, James Robinson","doi":"10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medial collateral ligament \"pie-crusting\" (MCLPC), selective release of the superficial MCL, has been shown to improve the arthroscopic access to the posterior horn of the medial meniscus without adversely affecting the outcomes of isolated meniscal surgery. However, whether MCL PC, to address concomitant meniscal lesions during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery, adversely affects ACLR outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether patients who had undergone MCLPC at the time of ACLR had similar post outcomes to patients undergoing isolated ACLR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>55 consecutive patients (33 male and 22 female), with minimum 2-year follow-up, who had undergone MCLPC with concomitant primary ACLR (PC group) were retrospectively matched on the basis of age, sex and follow-up with 55 patients who underwent isolated primary ACLR. Post-operative outcome measures (PROMs) included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner activity score, the EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire and EuroQol visual analogue scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two groups' median postoperative EQ 5D-VAS, EQ 5D-index and Tegner scores were similar. The difference between pre-operative and post-operative KOOS scores was similar for the two group for all subscales except the ADL subscale which was higher in the MCLPC group (24, IQR= 6-32) than in the isolated ACLR group (5, IQR= 0-9.74). The median post op IKDC score was 84 in the MCLPC group and compared with 90 in the isolated ACLR group. However, the difference between pre-operative and post-operative IKDC scores was higher in patients in the MCLPC group (40, IQR= 25-49) than in the isolated ACLR group (32, IQR=19.6-46.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MCLPC, performed at the time of ACLR does not appear to adversely affect the functional post-operative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV.</p>","PeriodicalId":36847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of ISAKOS Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2024.100359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Medial collateral ligament "pie-crusting" (MCLPC), selective release of the superficial MCL, has been shown to improve the arthroscopic access to the posterior horn of the medial meniscus without adversely affecting the outcomes of isolated meniscal surgery. However, whether MCL PC, to address concomitant meniscal lesions during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) surgery, adversely affects ACLR outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether patients who had undergone MCLPC at the time of ACLR had similar post outcomes to patients undergoing isolated ACLR.

Methods: 55 consecutive patients (33 male and 22 female), with minimum 2-year follow-up, who had undergone MCLPC with concomitant primary ACLR (PC group) were retrospectively matched on the basis of age, sex and follow-up with 55 patients who underwent isolated primary ACLR. Post-operative outcome measures (PROMs) included the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Tegner activity score, the EuroQol five-dimension health questionnaire and EuroQol visual analogue scale.

Results: The two groups' median postoperative EQ 5D-VAS, EQ 5D-index and Tegner scores were similar. The difference between pre-operative and post-operative KOOS scores was similar for the two group for all subscales except the ADL subscale which was higher in the MCLPC group (24, IQR= 6-32) than in the isolated ACLR group (5, IQR= 0-9.74). The median post op IKDC score was 84 in the MCLPC group and compared with 90 in the isolated ACLR group. However, the difference between pre-operative and post-operative IKDC scores was higher in patients in the MCLPC group (40, IQR= 25-49) than in the isolated ACLR group (32, IQR=19.6-46.8).

Conclusions: MCLPC, performed at the time of ACLR does not appear to adversely affect the functional post-operative outcomes.

Level of evidence: IV.

同时进行内侧半月板手术的 MCL 饼结痂似乎不会对初级前交叉韧带重建的功能结果产生不利影响。
目的:内侧副韧带 "饼状壳"(MCLPC),即选择性松解内侧副韧带,已被证明可改善关节镜下内侧半月板后角的入路,而不会对孤立的半月板手术效果产生不利影响。然而,在前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)手术中,MCL PC 用于处理并发的半月板病变是否会对 ACLR 的疗效产生不利影响,目前尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估在前交叉韧带重建手术时接受 MCLPC 的患者是否与接受孤立前交叉韧带重建手术的患者具有相似的术后效果。方法:根据年龄、性别和随访情况,将 55 名接受 MCLPC 并同时接受原发性前交叉韧带重建手术的连续患者(33 名男性和 22 名女性)(PC 组)与 55 名接受孤立原发性前交叉韧带重建手术的患者进行回顾性配对。术后结果测量指标(PROMs)包括膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分、国际膝关节文献委员会评分、Tegner活动评分、EuroQol五维健康问卷和EuroQol视觉模拟量表:结果:两组患者术后的 EQ 5D-VAS 中位数、EQ 5D 指数和 Tegner 评分相似。两组患者术前和术后的 KOOS 评分在所有分量表中的差异相似,但 ADL 分量表在 MCLPC 组(24,IQR= 6-32)高于孤立 ACLR 组(5,IQR= 0-9.74)。MCLPC 组术后 IKDC 评分中位数为 84 分,而孤立 ACLR 组为 90 分。然而,MCLPC组患者术前和术后IKDC评分的差异(40,IQR= 25-49)高于孤立前交叉韧带重建组(32,IQR=19.6-46.8):结论:在前交叉韧带置换术时进行MCLPC似乎不会对术后功能结果产生不利影响:证据级别:IV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
61
审稿时长
108 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信