Lung Transplantation After Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in High-Risk Recipients: A Propensity Matched Analysis of a National Database.

IF 4.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ernest G Chan, Rachel L Deitz, Jack K Donohue, John P Ryan, Yota Suzuki, Masashi Furukawa, Kentaro Noda, Pablo G Sanchez
{"title":"Lung Transplantation After Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion in High-Risk Recipients: A Propensity Matched Analysis of a National Database.","authors":"Ernest G Chan, Rachel L Deitz, Jack K Donohue, John P Ryan, Yota Suzuki, Masashi Furukawa, Kentaro Noda, Pablo G Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We report outcomes associated with EVLP lungs in high-risk lung transplant recipients utilizing a national database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS Database (1/1/2018-3/31/2024). High-risk status was defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 35 mmHg, lung retransplantation, or bridge to transplant. In addition to univariable analysis, propensity score matched analysis was performed on predictors of donor and recipient characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Risk of dying on the waitlist was significantly higher for high-risk candidates (HR: 1.69 [1.51 - 1.89], p < 0.001). Following matching, 203 EVLP cases were matched to 609 standard procurement recipients. The EVLP group was associated with higher rates of postoperative acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (27% vs 16%, p < 0.001), higher mortality on index admission (13% vs. 8%, p = 0.04), and longer length of stay (29 vs 25 days, p = 0.006). EVLP modality was associated with survival time (p < 0.001) with portable EVLP having significantly shorter survival (2.7 years) relative to standard cases (4.7 years, p < 0.02). A subgroup analysis found that this survival effect was limited to bridge and retransplant recipients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EVLP lungs were associated with higher rates of postoperative AKI and portable EVLP was associated with shorter survival in high-risk lung transplant recipients. However, given the high waitlist mortality in this candidate population, EVLP lungs should still be considered an alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":49975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2024.10.041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We report outcomes associated with EVLP lungs in high-risk lung transplant recipients utilizing a national database.

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the UNOS Database (1/1/2018-3/31/2024). High-risk status was defined as mean pulmonary arterial pressure > 35 mmHg, lung retransplantation, or bridge to transplant. In addition to univariable analysis, propensity score matched analysis was performed on predictors of donor and recipient characteristics.

Results: Risk of dying on the waitlist was significantly higher for high-risk candidates (HR: 1.69 [1.51 - 1.89], p < 0.001). Following matching, 203 EVLP cases were matched to 609 standard procurement recipients. The EVLP group was associated with higher rates of postoperative acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy (27% vs 16%, p < 0.001), higher mortality on index admission (13% vs. 8%, p = 0.04), and longer length of stay (29 vs 25 days, p = 0.006). EVLP modality was associated with survival time (p < 0.001) with portable EVLP having significantly shorter survival (2.7 years) relative to standard cases (4.7 years, p < 0.02). A subgroup analysis found that this survival effect was limited to bridge and retransplant recipients.

Conclusions: EVLP lungs were associated with higher rates of postoperative AKI and portable EVLP was associated with shorter survival in high-risk lung transplant recipients. However, given the high waitlist mortality in this candidate population, EVLP lungs should still be considered an alternative.

高风险受者体内肺灌注后的肺移植:全国数据库倾向匹配分析》。
目的:我们利用国家数据库报告了高风险肺移植受者EVLP肺的相关结果:我们对 UNOS 数据库(1/1/2018-3/31/2024)进行了回顾性分析。高风险状态定义为平均肺动脉压> 35 mmHg、肺再移植或移植桥。除了单变量分析外,还对供体和受体特征的预测因素进行了倾向得分匹配分析:结果:高风险候选者在等待名单上死亡的风险明显更高(HR:1.69 [1.51 - 1.89],P < 0.001)。经过配对,203 个 EVLP 病例与 609 个标准接受者进行了配对。EVLP组需要肾脏替代治疗的术后急性肾损伤发生率较高(27% vs. 16%,p < 0.001),入院时死亡率较高(13% vs. 8%,p = 0.04),住院时间较长(29天 vs. 25天,p = 0.006)。EVLP模式与存活时间相关(p < 0.001),便携式EVLP的存活时间(2.7年)明显短于标准病例(4.7年,p < 0.02)。亚组分析发现,这种存活率影响仅限于桥接和再移植受者:结论:EVLP肺与较高的术后AKI发生率有关,便携式EVLP与高风险肺移植受者较短的生存期有关。然而,考虑到这一候选人群的高等待死亡率,EVLP肺仍应被视为一种替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1079
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery presents original, peer-reviewed articles on diseases of the heart, great vessels, lungs and thorax with emphasis on surgical interventions. An official publication of The American Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Western Thoracic Surgical Association, the Journal focuses on techniques and developments in acquired cardiac surgery, congenital cardiac repair, thoracic procedures, heart and lung transplantation, mechanical circulatory support and other procedures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信