Quality assessment in bone densitometry: a case of incorrect hip analysis.

IF 0.5 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
BJR Case Reports Pub Date : 2024-10-22 eCollection Date: 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1093/bjrcr/uaae038
Hongmin Xu, Medhat Sam Gabriel, Judy Rose James
{"title":"Quality assessment in bone densitometry: a case of incorrect hip analysis.","authors":"Hongmin Xu, Medhat Sam Gabriel, Judy Rose James","doi":"10.1093/bjrcr/uaae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a sophisticated imaging technique utilized in the field of medical diagnostics to measure bone mineral density. The significance of DXA lies in its ability to accurately assess bone health, which is crucial in the evaluation of osteoporosis, a condition characterized by weakened bones and heightened susceptibility to fractures. Despite its widespread adoption and clinical utility, DXA is not without limitations. Factors such as body size, tissue hydration, the presence of metal implants, improper equipment installation and maintenance, as well as inadequate education and training in bone densitometry may influence DXA measurements, necessitating careful interpretation by trained professionals. We present a case to show the errors that occurred during DXA analysis leading to dramatic T-score changes, highlighting the importance of technologists' adherence to manufacturers' recommendations, to ensure the accurate processing of DXA scans and diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":45216,"journal":{"name":"BJR Case Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11530240/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJR Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjrcr/uaae038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a sophisticated imaging technique utilized in the field of medical diagnostics to measure bone mineral density. The significance of DXA lies in its ability to accurately assess bone health, which is crucial in the evaluation of osteoporosis, a condition characterized by weakened bones and heightened susceptibility to fractures. Despite its widespread adoption and clinical utility, DXA is not without limitations. Factors such as body size, tissue hydration, the presence of metal implants, improper equipment installation and maintenance, as well as inadequate education and training in bone densitometry may influence DXA measurements, necessitating careful interpretation by trained professionals. We present a case to show the errors that occurred during DXA analysis leading to dramatic T-score changes, highlighting the importance of technologists' adherence to manufacturers' recommendations, to ensure the accurate processing of DXA scans and diagnosis.

骨密度测量的质量评估:一个错误的髋关节分析案例。
双能 X 射线吸收仪(DXA)是医疗诊断领域用于测量骨矿物质密度的一种精密成像技术。DXA 的意义在于它能够准确评估骨骼健康状况,这对评估骨质疏松症至关重要,骨质疏松症的特点是骨骼变弱,更容易发生骨折。尽管 DXA 被广泛采用并具有临床实用性,但它也并非没有局限性。体型、组织水化、金属植入物的存在、设备安装和维护不当以及骨密度测量方面的教育和培训不足等因素都可能影响 DXA 测量结果,因此需要训练有素的专业人员进行仔细判读。我们通过一个病例来说明在 DXA 分析过程中出现的错误导致了 T 评分的急剧变化,从而强调了技术人员遵守制造商建议的重要性,以确保准确处理 DXA 扫描和诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJR Case Reports
BJR Case Reports RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信