The haemophilia joint health score for the assessment of joint health in patients with haemophilia.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Haemophilia Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1111/hae.15116
Cihan Ay, Maria Elisa Mancuso, Davide Matino, Karen Strike, Gianluigi Pasta
{"title":"The haemophilia joint health score for the assessment of joint health in patients with haemophilia.","authors":"Cihan Ay, Maria Elisa Mancuso, Davide Matino, Karen Strike, Gianluigi Pasta","doi":"10.1111/hae.15116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The haemophilia joint health score (HJHS) is a tool used to assess joint changes in patients with haemophilia. There is lack of consensus on the interpretation of HJHS scores and their clinical relevance.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate available literature reporting HJHS changes over time and assess a possible cut-off value for clinically relevant outcomes and the ideal follow-up for a meaningful score change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search of studies published between 2011 and 2023 where the HJHS version 2.1 had been adopted to detect changes in joint health in patients with haemophilia. We focused on studies that assessed clinical relevance of HJHS changes, evaluated the use of cut-off values and reported a follow-up over time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search identified 213 publications of which 53 (25%) were deemed relevant for this review. Of these, 33 (62%) publications reported the total HJHS score and 20 (38%) reported a single joint HJHS score, while the way of reporting HJHS scores/change was highly variable. Ten publications (19%) assessed clinical relevance, but their methods of calculation differed (defining a cut-off score, measuring standardised response mean or minimal detectable change). The follow-up duration varied from 2 weeks to 8 years in these 10 studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High variability in assessing HJHS change over time is the primary consequence of its low sensitivity, and the lack of consensus on interpretation and clinical relevance of the score. Therefore, more sensitive tools should be used alongside HJHS to better define the joint health status of patients with haemophilia.</p>","PeriodicalId":12819,"journal":{"name":"Haemophilia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemophilia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.15116","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The haemophilia joint health score (HJHS) is a tool used to assess joint changes in patients with haemophilia. There is lack of consensus on the interpretation of HJHS scores and their clinical relevance.

Aim: To evaluate available literature reporting HJHS changes over time and assess a possible cut-off value for clinically relevant outcomes and the ideal follow-up for a meaningful score change.

Methods: We conducted a literature search of studies published between 2011 and 2023 where the HJHS version 2.1 had been adopted to detect changes in joint health in patients with haemophilia. We focused on studies that assessed clinical relevance of HJHS changes, evaluated the use of cut-off values and reported a follow-up over time.

Results: Our search identified 213 publications of which 53 (25%) were deemed relevant for this review. Of these, 33 (62%) publications reported the total HJHS score and 20 (38%) reported a single joint HJHS score, while the way of reporting HJHS scores/change was highly variable. Ten publications (19%) assessed clinical relevance, but their methods of calculation differed (defining a cut-off score, measuring standardised response mean or minimal detectable change). The follow-up duration varied from 2 weeks to 8 years in these 10 studies.

Conclusions: High variability in assessing HJHS change over time is the primary consequence of its low sensitivity, and the lack of consensus on interpretation and clinical relevance of the score. Therefore, more sensitive tools should be used alongside HJHS to better define the joint health status of patients with haemophilia.

用于评估血友病患者关节健康状况的血友病关节健康评分。
简介血友病关节健康评分(HJHS)是一种用于评估血友病患者关节变化的工具。目的:评估报告血友病关节健康评分随时间变化的现有文献,并评估临床相关结果的可能临界值以及有意义的评分变化的理想随访时间:我们对 2011 年至 2023 年间发表的采用 HJHS 2.1 版检测血友病患者关节健康变化的研究进行了文献检索。我们重点关注那些评估 HJHS 变化的临床相关性、评估临界值的使用情况并报告随访情况的研究:我们的搜索发现了 213 篇出版物,其中 53 篇(25%)被认为与本综述相关。其中,33 篇(62%)出版物报告了 HJHS 总分,20 篇(38%)报告了单一的 HJHS 联合评分,而报告 HJHS 评分/变化的方式差异很大。10篇出版物(19%)对临床相关性进行了评估,但其计算方法各不相同(定义截断分数、测量标准化反应平均值或最小检测变化)。这10项研究的随访时间从2周到8年不等:结论:评估 HJHS 随时间推移而发生的变化存在很大差异,其主要原因是灵敏度较低,而且对该评分的解释和临床相关性缺乏共识。因此,在使用 HJHS 的同时,还应使用灵敏度更高的工具,以更好地确定血友病患者的关节健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Haemophilia
Haemophilia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
28.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haemophilia is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information regarding the comprehensive care of haemophilia. The Journal contains review articles, original scientific papers and case reports related to haemophilia care, with frequent supplements. Subjects covered include: clotting factor deficiencies, both inherited and acquired: haemophilia A, B, von Willebrand''s disease, deficiencies of factor V, VII, X and XI replacement therapy for clotting factor deficiencies component therapy in the developing world transfusion transmitted disease haemophilia care and paediatrics, orthopaedics, gynaecology and obstetrics nursing laboratory diagnosis carrier detection psycho-social concerns economic issues audit inherited platelet disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信