Is Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction "Silva Technique" Equal to All-Inside Techniques? A Prospective Single-Center Study: An Alternative ACL All-Inside Reconstruction Technique Using a Tibial Tunnel and Bone Graft.

IF 1.2 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Advances in Orthopedics Pub Date : 2024-10-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/2371242
Panagiotis Karampinas, John Vlamis, Athanasios Galanis, Michail Vavourakis, Evangelos Sakellariou, Iordanis Varsamos, Ioannis Spyrou, Spiros Pneumaticos
{"title":"Is Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction \"Silva Technique\" Equal to All-Inside Techniques? A Prospective Single-Center Study: An Alternative ACL All-Inside Reconstruction Technique Using a Tibial Tunnel and Bone Graft.","authors":"Panagiotis Karampinas, John Vlamis, Athanasios Galanis, Michail Vavourakis, Evangelos Sakellariou, Iordanis Varsamos, Ioannis Spyrou, Spiros Pneumaticos","doi":"10.1155/2024/2371242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The development of less invasive all-inside techniques regarding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery has been associated with various advantages, including fewer complications and reduced postoperative pain. Silva et al. described a quadruple semitendinosus graft construct and suspensory button fixation for ACL reconstruction as an alternative technique. At the end of this technique, the tibial tunnel is filled with a bone autograft plug. This paper aims to examine the incorporation of the autograft and thus evaluate whether the \"Silva technique\" provides the same benefits as all-inside techniques. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective study assessed 31 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery using the \"Silva technique.\" The cases involved in the study were skeletally mature patients with no previous history of ACL surgery or multiligamentous instability. All patients followed the same rehabilitation program and were examined at three standardized follow-up visits: 4 months, 8 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Tegner-Lysholm knee score (TLKS), visual analog score (VAS) for pain, and the IKDC subjective knee score were completed at every visit. A knee MRI scan was performed at every scheduled visit to assess bone graft incorporation and remodeling. <b>Results:</b> TLKS scores revealed a considerable improvement compared to preoperative figures, from 57.2 points preoperatively to an average of 99.4 at the 12-month follow-up (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). VAS scores were substantially ameliorated after the operation and until the second follow-up visit, from 5 before surgery to zero 8 months after the operation, with no noteworthy alterations afterward (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). IKDC subjective knee score outcomes were found to have increased at the last follow-up, from 59.3 prior to surgery to 99.8 12 months postoperatively (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Regarding the MRI features of the bone autograft, the tibial tunnel was entirely filled by bone formation at the last MRI scan, suggesting complete integration of the autograft in all patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> Bone autograft employed to seal the tibial tunnel was completely incorporated in all cases 1 year postoperatively. The \"Silva technique\" appears to feature all the avails of all-inside techniques, whilst it seems to be simpler and easier than them after the surgeon is familiarized with its particular aspects. It is a robust option in orthopedic surgeons' arsenal. However, further large-scale pertinent research is requisite to confirm the findings of this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7358,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Orthopedics","volume":"2024 ","pages":"2371242"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11531358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/2371242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The development of less invasive all-inside techniques regarding anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery has been associated with various advantages, including fewer complications and reduced postoperative pain. Silva et al. described a quadruple semitendinosus graft construct and suspensory button fixation for ACL reconstruction as an alternative technique. At the end of this technique, the tibial tunnel is filled with a bone autograft plug. This paper aims to examine the incorporation of the autograft and thus evaluate whether the "Silva technique" provides the same benefits as all-inside techniques. Methods: A prospective study assessed 31 patients undergoing ACL reconstruction surgery using the "Silva technique." The cases involved in the study were skeletally mature patients with no previous history of ACL surgery or multiligamentous instability. All patients followed the same rehabilitation program and were examined at three standardized follow-up visits: 4 months, 8 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Tegner-Lysholm knee score (TLKS), visual analog score (VAS) for pain, and the IKDC subjective knee score were completed at every visit. A knee MRI scan was performed at every scheduled visit to assess bone graft incorporation and remodeling. Results: TLKS scores revealed a considerable improvement compared to preoperative figures, from 57.2 points preoperatively to an average of 99.4 at the 12-month follow-up (p < 0.0001). VAS scores were substantially ameliorated after the operation and until the second follow-up visit, from 5 before surgery to zero 8 months after the operation, with no noteworthy alterations afterward (p < 0.0001). IKDC subjective knee score outcomes were found to have increased at the last follow-up, from 59.3 prior to surgery to 99.8 12 months postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Regarding the MRI features of the bone autograft, the tibial tunnel was entirely filled by bone formation at the last MRI scan, suggesting complete integration of the autograft in all patients. Conclusions: Bone autograft employed to seal the tibial tunnel was completely incorporated in all cases 1 year postoperatively. The "Silva technique" appears to feature all the avails of all-inside techniques, whilst it seems to be simpler and easier than them after the surgeon is familiarized with its particular aspects. It is a robust option in orthopedic surgeons' arsenal. However, further large-scale pertinent research is requisite to confirm the findings of this study.

前交叉韧带重建 "Silva 技术 "是否等同于全内侧技术?一项前瞻性单中心研究:使用胫骨隧道和骨移植的另一种前交叉韧带全内重建技术。
背景:前交叉韧带(ACL)重建手术采用创伤较小的全内侧技术,具有减少并发症和减轻术后疼痛等多种优势。Silva 等人描述了一种用于前交叉韧带重建的四重半腱肌移植物构建和悬吊扣固定替代技术。在该技术的最后,胫骨隧道被自体骨移植塞填满。本文旨在研究自体移植物的植入情况,从而评估 "席尔瓦技术 "是否与全内侧技术具有相同的优势。研究方法一项前瞻性研究评估了31名使用 "席尔瓦技术 "进行前交叉韧带重建手术的患者。参与研究的病例均为骨骼发育成熟的患者,既往无前交叉韧带手术史或多韧带不稳定史。所有患者都接受了相同的康复计划,并在三次标准化随访中接受了检查:术后 4 个月、8 个月和 1 年。每次随访都要完成 Tegner-Lysholm 膝关节评分(TLKS)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 IKDC 膝关节主观评分。每次预约就诊时都进行膝关节核磁共振扫描,以评估植骨融合和重塑情况。结果TLKS 评分与术前相比有了显著改善,从术前的 57.2 分提高到 12 个月随访时的平均 99.4 分(P P P P 结论):在所有病例中,术后 1 年用于封闭胫骨隧道的骨自体移植物都完全融入了胫骨隧道。Silva技术 "似乎具有全内技术的所有优点,但在外科医生熟悉其特殊方面后,它似乎比全内技术更简单、更容易。在骨科医生的武器库中,这是一个强有力的选择。不过,要证实这项研究的结果,还需要进一步开展大规模的相关研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Orthopedics is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for orthopaedics working on improving the quality of orthopedic health care. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to arthroplasty, hand surgery, limb reconstruction, pediatric orthopaedics, sports medicine, trauma, spinal deformities, and orthopaedic oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信