Impact of histological remission for predicting clinical relapse in Crohn's disease: a post-hoc analysis of the prospective STORI cohort.

Catherine Reenaers, Diana Enea, Marie Nachury, David Laharie, Yoram Bouhnik, Mathurin Fumery, Jean-Marc Gornet, Aurélien Amiot, Romain Altwegg, Martine de Vos, Philippe Marteau, Arnaud Bourreille, Stéphane Nancey, Stéphanie Viennot, Edouard Louis, Magali Svrcek
{"title":"Impact of histological remission for predicting clinical relapse in Crohn's disease: a post-hoc analysis of the prospective STORI cohort.","authors":"Catherine Reenaers, Diana Enea, Marie Nachury, David Laharie, Yoram Bouhnik, Mathurin Fumery, Jean-Marc Gornet, Aurélien Amiot, Romain Altwegg, Martine de Vos, Philippe Marteau, Arnaud Bourreille, Stéphane Nancey, Stéphanie Viennot, Edouard Louis, Magali Svrcek","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Achieving deep remission, encompassing clinical, endoscopic, and biological remission, is the goal in managing Crohn's disease (CD). The role of histological remission remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the impact of histological inflammation on clinical relapse risk in CD and explore the relationship between histology, endoscopic scores, and biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients from the prospective STORI cohort underwent ileocolonoscopy with CDEIS calculation and 2 biopsies from the most inflamed or previously inflamed areas. Histological scores (Robarts, Geboes, modified Geboes, Nancy, and IBD-DCA) were determined by two independent pathologists in a central reading process. Histological remission was defined by specific score thresholds. Clinical relapse, defined by CDAI >250 or a CDAI increase of 70 points over two weeks, was monitored for at least one year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 115 patients included in STORI, 160 biopsies (44 ileal and 116 colonic) from 76 patients were analyzed. Histological remission rates were 46% (Nancy), 55% (Robarts), 61% (Geboes), and 41% (IBD-DCA). During follow-up, 35 patients (46%) experienced a clinical relapse: 37% with histological remission and 56% without, based on the Nancy score. Among the mucosal healing (MH) subgroup (45 patients), 34% with histological remission and 44% without relapsed (p=0.18). Histological scores did not predict clinical relapse. Only faecal calprotectin (FC) was a significant predictor in multivariate analysis (p=0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite correlations with endoscopy and biomarkers, histological scores did not predict clinical relapse in CD patients in remission. Thus, these scores are not recommended for clinical practice to assess relapse risk in CD.</p>","PeriodicalId":94074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's & colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Achieving deep remission, encompassing clinical, endoscopic, and biological remission, is the goal in managing Crohn's disease (CD). The role of histological remission remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the impact of histological inflammation on clinical relapse risk in CD and explore the relationship between histology, endoscopic scores, and biomarkers.

Methods: Patients from the prospective STORI cohort underwent ileocolonoscopy with CDEIS calculation and 2 biopsies from the most inflamed or previously inflamed areas. Histological scores (Robarts, Geboes, modified Geboes, Nancy, and IBD-DCA) were determined by two independent pathologists in a central reading process. Histological remission was defined by specific score thresholds. Clinical relapse, defined by CDAI >250 or a CDAI increase of 70 points over two weeks, was monitored for at least one year.

Results: Out of 115 patients included in STORI, 160 biopsies (44 ileal and 116 colonic) from 76 patients were analyzed. Histological remission rates were 46% (Nancy), 55% (Robarts), 61% (Geboes), and 41% (IBD-DCA). During follow-up, 35 patients (46%) experienced a clinical relapse: 37% with histological remission and 56% without, based on the Nancy score. Among the mucosal healing (MH) subgroup (45 patients), 34% with histological remission and 44% without relapsed (p=0.18). Histological scores did not predict clinical relapse. Only faecal calprotectin (FC) was a significant predictor in multivariate analysis (p=0.029).

Conclusion: Despite correlations with endoscopy and biomarkers, histological scores did not predict clinical relapse in CD patients in remission. Thus, these scores are not recommended for clinical practice to assess relapse risk in CD.

组织学缓解对预测克罗恩病临床复发的影响:对前瞻性 STORI 队列的事后分析。
背景和目的:实现深度缓解(包括临床、内镜和生物学缓解)是治疗克罗恩病(CD)的目标。组织学缓解的作用仍不明确。本研究旨在研究组织学炎症对克罗恩病临床复发风险的影响,并探讨组织学、内镜评分和生物标志物之间的关系:前瞻性 STORI 队列中的患者接受了回肠结肠镜检查,并进行了 CDEIS 计算,还从炎症最严重或曾有过炎症的部位进行了 2 次活检。组织学评分(Robarts、Geboes、改良Geboes、Nancy和IBD-DCA)由两名独立病理学家在中央阅读过程中确定。组织学缓解由特定的评分阈值定义。临床复发的定义是 CDAI >250 或 CDAI 在两周内增加 70 分,监测时间至少为一年:在 STORI 纳入的 115 名患者中,对 76 名患者的 160 例活检(44 例回肠活检和 116 例结肠活检)进行了分析。组织学缓解率分别为 46%(南希)、55%(罗巴茨)、61%(吉博斯)和 41%(IBD-DCA)。在随访期间,35 名患者(46%)出现了临床复发:根据南希评分,37%的患者有组织学缓解,56%的患者无组织学缓解。在粘膜愈合(MH)亚组(45 名患者)中,组织学缓解的患者占 34%,未缓解的患者占 44%(P=0.18)。组织学评分不能预测临床复发。在多变量分析中,只有粪钙蛋白(FC)是一个重要的预测因子(P=0.029):结论:尽管组织学评分与内镜检查和生物标志物相关,但并不能预测缓解期 CD 患者的临床复发。因此,临床实践中不建议用这些评分来评估CD患者的复发风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信