Emotion processes in voice-hearers: Understanding differences in emotional reactivity, emotion regulation and alexithymia

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Kelly Cusworth, Georgie Paulik, Neil Thomas, David Preece, Guillermo Campitelli, Danielle C. Mathersul
{"title":"Emotion processes in voice-hearers: Understanding differences in emotional reactivity, emotion regulation and alexithymia","authors":"Kelly Cusworth,&nbsp;Georgie Paulik,&nbsp;Neil Thomas,&nbsp;David Preece,&nbsp;Guillermo Campitelli,&nbsp;Danielle C. Mathersul","doi":"10.1111/papt.12554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Disrupted emotion processes are commonly linked to the onset and maintenance of auditory verbal hallucinations. However, a comprehensive approach using an extended emotion model has not previously been applied to voice-hearers to distinguish impairments in emotion processes from non-clinical populations. The present study hypothesised voice-hearers, as compared to controls, would have (1) higher reactivity to negative emotions and lower reactivity to positive emotions, (2) more difficulties regulating negative and positive emotions, (3) more maladaptive strategy use, and (4) higher alexithymia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>T-tests tested these hypotheses, comparing self-report measures of emotional reactivity, emotion regulation and alexithymia in voice-hearers (<i>n</i> = 50) to controls (<i>n</i> = 53).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were no group differences in emotional reactivity to positive or negative emotions. Compared to controls, voice-hearers showed difficulties in both positive and negative emotion regulation, were more likely to use expressive suppression, and were more likely to be alexithymic.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>These findings may help researchers and clinicians identify difficulties in voice-hearers' emotion processing, providing better direction for case formulation and treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54539,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","volume":"97 4","pages":"706-721"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Psychotherapy-Theory Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/papt.12554","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Disrupted emotion processes are commonly linked to the onset and maintenance of auditory verbal hallucinations. However, a comprehensive approach using an extended emotion model has not previously been applied to voice-hearers to distinguish impairments in emotion processes from non-clinical populations. The present study hypothesised voice-hearers, as compared to controls, would have (1) higher reactivity to negative emotions and lower reactivity to positive emotions, (2) more difficulties regulating negative and positive emotions, (3) more maladaptive strategy use, and (4) higher alexithymia.

Method

T-tests tested these hypotheses, comparing self-report measures of emotional reactivity, emotion regulation and alexithymia in voice-hearers (n = 50) to controls (n = 53).

Results

There were no group differences in emotional reactivity to positive or negative emotions. Compared to controls, voice-hearers showed difficulties in both positive and negative emotion regulation, were more likely to use expressive suppression, and were more likely to be alexithymic.

Conclusions

These findings may help researchers and clinicians identify difficulties in voice-hearers' emotion processing, providing better direction for case formulation and treatment.

语音倾听者的情绪过程:了解情绪反应、情绪调节和情感障碍的差异。
目的:情感过程紊乱通常与听觉幻听的发生和维持有关。然而,此前还没有人对幻听者使用过扩展情绪模型的综合方法,以将情绪过程的障碍与非临床人群区分开来。本研究假设,与对照组相比,幻听者(1)对消极情绪的反应性更高,对积极情绪的反应性更低;(2)更难调节消极和积极情绪;(3)更多地使用不适应策略;(4)更高的自闭症:通过 T 检验对上述假设进行了检验,比较了语音倾听者(50 人)与对照组(53 人)在情绪反应性、情绪调节和情感淡漠方面的自我报告测量:结果:听嗓者对积极或消极情绪的反应能力没有群体差异。与对照组相比,语音倾听者在积极和消极情绪调节方面都表现出困难,更有可能使用表达性抑制,也更有可能是情感自闭症患者:这些发现可能有助于研究人员和临床医生识别语音倾听者在情绪处理方面的困难,从而为病例制定和治疗提供更好的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory Research and Practice (formerly The British Journal of Medical Psychology) is an international scientific journal with a focus on the psychological and social processes that underlie the development and improvement of psychological problems and mental wellbeing, including: theoretical and research development in the understanding of cognitive and emotional factors in psychological problems; behaviour and relationships; vulnerability to, adjustment to, assessment of, and recovery (assisted or otherwise) from psychological distresses; psychological therapies with a focus on understanding the processes which affect outcomes where mental health is concerned.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信